All authors
Claude Skills by paperclipai
github.com/paperclipai581 skills70 installs2,834 views
- Market SizingEstimate market size using TAM, SAM, and SOM with top-down and bottom-up approachesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Marketing IdeasGenerate 5 creative, cost-effective marketing ideas with channels, messaging, and engagement rationaleVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Metrics DashboardDefine and design a product metrics dashboard with key metrics, data sources, visualization types, and alert thresholdsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Monetization StrategyBrainstorm 3-5 monetization strategies with audience fit, risks, and validation experimentsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- North Star MetricDefine a North Star Metric and 3-5 supporting input metrics that form a metrics constellation. Classify the business game (Attention, Transaction, Productivity) and validate against 7 criteria for ...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Opportunity Solution TreeBuild an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery HabitsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Outcome RoadmapTransform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impactsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Pestle AnalysisPerform a PESTLE analysis covering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factorsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Porters Five ForcesPerform Porter's Five Forces analysis — competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrantsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Positioning IdeasBrainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors. Identifies top competitors and generates positioning statements with rationaleVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Pre MortemRun a pre-mortem risk analysis on a PRD or launch plan. Categorizes risks as Tigers (real problems), Paper Tigers (overblown concerns), and Elephants (unspoken worries), then classifies as launch-b...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Pricing StrategyAnalyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticityVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Prioritization FrameworksReference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and moreVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Prioritize AssumptionsPrioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for eachVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Prioritize FeaturesPrioritize a backlog of feature ideas based on impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment with top 5 recommendationsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Privacy PolicyDraft a detailed privacy policy covering data types, jurisdiction, GDPR and compliance considerations, and clauses needing legal reviewVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Product NameBrainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audienceVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Product StrategyCreate a comprehensive product strategy using the 9-section Product Strategy Canvas — vision, segments, costs, value propositions, trade-offs, metrics, growth, capabilities, and defensibilityVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Product VisionBrainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams and aligns stakeholdersVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Release NotesGenerate user-facing release notes from tickets, PRDs, or changelogs. Creates clear, engaging summaries organized by category (new features, improvements, fixes)Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Review ResumeComprehensive PM resume review and tailoring against 10 best practices including XYZ+S formula, keyword optimization, job-specific tailoring, and structureVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Sentiment AnalysisAnalyze user feedback data to identify segments with sentiment scores, JTBD, and product satisfaction insightsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Sql QueriesGenerate SQL queries from natural language descriptionsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Stakeholder MapBuild a stakeholder map using a power/interest grid, identify communication strategies per quadrant, and generate a communication planVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Startup CanvasGenerate a Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) and Business Model (costs + revenue) for a new product. An alternative to BMC and Lean Canvas that separates strategy from business...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Summarize InterviewSummarize a customer interview transcript into a structured template with JTBD, satisfaction signals, and action itemsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Summarize MeetingSummarize a meeting transcript into structured notes with date, participants, topic, key decisions, summary points, and action itemsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Swot AnalysisPerform a detailed SWOT analysis — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendationsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Test ScenariosCreate comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- User PersonasCreate refined user personas from research data — 3 personas with JTBD, pains, gains, and unexpected insightsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- User SegmentationSegment users from feedback data based on behavior, JTBD, and needs. Identifies at least 3 distinct user segmentsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- User StoriesCreate user stories following the 3 C's (Card, Conversation, Confirmation) and INVEST criteria with descriptions, design links, and acceptance criteriaVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Value Prop StatementsGenerate value proposition statements for marketing, sales, and onboarding from existing value propositionsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Value PropositionDesign a detailed value proposition using a 6-part JTBD template — Who, Why, What before, How, What after, AlternativesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- WwasCreate product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic contextVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Code Review ActionGitHub Actions workflow for automated pragmatic code review on pull requests, posting triage-leveled findings as PR commentsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Design Review ActionGitHub Actions integration for automated design review on pull requests that modify frontend filesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Pragmatic Code ReviewPerform a 7-tier hierarchical code quality review covering Architecture, Functionality, Security, Maintainability, Testing, Performance, and Dependencies with triage levels (Critical/Blocker, Improvement, Nit)Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Security Review ActionGitHub Actions workflow for automated security review on pull requests with confidence-gated PR commentsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Security ReviewPerform a focused 3-phase security review with vulnerability identification, false-positive filtering, and confidence scoring (>80% exploitability threshold) covering Input Validation, Auth, Crypto, Injection, and Data ExposureVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Readme UpdaterUpdate the root README.md with entries for new or changed agent companies. Use when a new company has been added to the repo, when company details have changed (agents added/removed, skills added/removed), or when the user asks to refresh/sync the README. Triggers on: "update the readme", "add this company to the readme", "sync readme", "refresh readme", or after creating a new company with company-creator.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- BrainstormingExplores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. Use before any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Dispatching Parallel AgentsUse when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependenciesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Executing PlansUse when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpointsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Finishing A Development BranchUse when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work — guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanupVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Receiving Code ReviewUse when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable — requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementationVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Requesting Code ReviewUse when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirementsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Subagent Driven DevelopmentUse when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current sessionVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Systematic DebuggingUse when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixesVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860
- Test Driven DevelopmentUse when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation codeVotes: 0GitHub stars: 860