Security methodology

How Skills Directory scans Claude and agent skills

Skills can shape agent behavior, suggest commands, and include supporting files. Our methodology is designed to surface risk before a user copies or installs a skill.

Prompt injection and instruction hijacking
Credential theft or secret exfiltration
Suspicious shell commands and code execution
Network access and external data transfer
File-system writes, deletion, or persistence
Hidden helper files or obfuscated instructions
Supply-chain and install-time risk signals
Over-broad permissions or unclear approval gates

How grades work

Each skill starts from a high score. Findings reduce the score based on severity. The final score maps to a letter grade so users can quickly decide what deserves review.

GradeScoreMeaning
A90-100Low risk signals detected; still review before install
B75-89Some risk signals; inspect details before using
C60-74Meaningful concerns; use only with strong source trust
D40-59High concern; avoid unless you understand every issue
F0-39Severe risk signals; do not install casually

What scans can catch

Static scans are good at catching suspicious strings, risky command patterns, secret handling, hidden files, and instructions that ask agents to bypass user intent.

What scans cannot prove

Automated scans cannot guarantee intent, correctness, or future repository changes. Always review source and install only what you trust.

Trust-preserving monetization rule

Sponsors may buy clearly labeled placements, but they cannot buy a security grade, hide findings, or override organic safety signals. The directory is useful only if users can trust that grades mean what they say.

Claude Skill Security Methodology — How Skills Directory Grades Agent Skills | Skills Directory