Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when meeting the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) open-science requirements. JAP holds empirical work (including meta-analyses) to the TOP framework — data, materials, and code availability with persistent identifiers, a data-transparency / data-availability statement, and preregistration weighed in evaluation. Prepares compliance; it does not waive requirements.

Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. JAP R&Rs typically demand stronger theory, added rigor (alternative models, CMV checks, robustness), and fuller transparency across multiple reviewers and an action editor. The response must address every point, strengthen the contribution, and keep masking intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.

Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) evaluates a manuscript — masked (anonymized) peer review, the action-editor model, the dual gate of theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor, and common desk-reject patterns. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Use when designing studies and measurement for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript so they meet the journal's high bar on construct validity, causal inference, common-method variance, nested/multilevel data, and sample-size justification. Strengthens the design and measurement plan; it does not write code.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) via Editorial Manager — APA 7th-edition style, the APA submission/masking checklist, anonymization for masked review, the structured abstract, the data-availability/TOP statement, and persistent identifiers for data/materials/code. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript in APA 7th-edition style — correlation/descriptives tables, CFA/SEM path diagrams, multilevel (HLM) result tables, and meta-analytic forest/funnel plots. Exhibits must carry effect sizes, CIs, and reliabilities and be self-contained. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

Use when building the theoretical model and hypotheses for a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript. JAP demands a genuine I-O theoretical contribution with an explicit mechanism, directional hypotheses, and a clear confirmatory/exploratory split — theory stated before the data, not after. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Use when deciding whether an I-O / applied-psychology project fits the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) and which article type to target. JAP wants a genuine theoretical contribution to work-and-organizational science backed by rigorous measurement, not a rigorous study with no theoretical advance. Frames the question and tests fit; it does not collect data.

Use when starting or navigating any Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing among article types or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and article type (Feature Article, Research Report, theory-development article, integrative review, qualitative, meta-analysis), and flags JAP's twin gates — a real I-O theoretical contribution and measurement/design rigor. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

Use when drafting or polishing a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript to fit APA 7th-edition style, the I-O contribution-forward narrative arc, and the article-type length norms (Feature Article commensurate with contribution; tighter Research Report). Tightens prose, structure, and style; it does not invent content.

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 准备代码与数据可用性、撰写诚实的可用性声明时调用。说明本刊是否设正式制品评审(artifact evaluation)属待核实的现状，给出无论政策如何都应做到的图形学制品自律标准：代码/数据/网格/预训练模型/渲染脚本的公开与托管、双盲外审下的匿名化、演示视频与结果可复现、受限数据的替代核验途径，以及可用性声明的写法。适用于把图形/几何论文的制品打包到经得起审阅、避免声明与实际不符的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 撰写审稿意见答复(rebuttal)与修回说明时调用。覆盖点对点(point-by-point)逐条答复的组织、大修/小修的不同策略、如何用新增图形证据(渲染对比、几何误差、消融、用户研究)回应质疑、修改处在正文的定位标注、不采纳意见时的礼貌据理说明、以及修回说明信的结构。适用于收到外审意见后把每条意见闭环、准备好经得起复审与主编终审的修回材料的场景。

在《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 稿件录用后、准备定稿与校样清样时调用。覆盖录用后解除匿名(补真实致谢、基金编号、作者简介、代码/数据真实链接)、按编辑部要求定稿排版、校样(清样)校对流程、图形结果的印刷分辨率与色彩、演示视频/多媒体附件的最终提交、版权与出版许可、以及见刊前最后一轮易错项核对。适用于把已录用的图形/CAD 论文稳妥推进到见刊、避免校样阶段出错的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 设计与呈现实验证据时调用。覆盖图形学/CAD 论文特有的证据：几何精度指标(Chamfer/Hausdorff)、渲染质量(PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS)、可视化有效性与用户研究、公平基线与相同预算对比、消融、时间与显存开销、渲染图与几何误差色图呈现、以及主客观评测与统计口径。适用于把方法主张与图形/几何证据一一绑定、避免"只有指标无视觉对比"或"基线不公平"在外审被质疑的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 撰写相关工作与文献综述、确立图形/几何创新性时调用。覆盖 delta 优先的相关工作组织、如何把本文与最接近的图形学/CAD/可视化/VR 工作区分、如何按贡献类型(几何处理、渲染、CAD、可视化、VR、图像视频)分类梳理、GB/T 7714 引用与中文文献中英文对照、以及避免文献罗列与漏引本刊相关工作。适用于把相关工作写成支撑创新性论证而非文献清单、并在外审前站稳增量的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 提升论文可复现性与实验可重复时调用。覆盖图形学/CAD 特有的可复现要点：固定随机种子、记录 GPU/驱动/渲染器版本、锁定网格/点云/纹理/视频数据集、固定渲染与几何管线参数(采样数、光照、相机、分辨率)、复现包冒烟测试、几何误差与渲染质量指标的计算脚本对齐、以及大数据的稳定托管。适用于让外审与读者能重跑出论文表图、避免"结果无法复现"质疑的场景。

在需要理解《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 审稿流程、稿件状态与各轮次预期时调用。覆盖编辑初审→专家外审(双盲)→复审退修→栏目主编组织编委终审的同行评议链路、综述稿通过初审后一般由 3~4 名专家审阅的口径、初审退稿常见理由、修回轮次(大修/小修)与重新送审、在线系统的状态跟踪、以及审稿周期/录用率等待核实项。适用于投稿后判断当前处于哪一环、下一步该做什么、如何合理预期时间线的场景。

在向《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 jcad.cn 在线投稿系统注册与提交、DOC/PDF/ZIP/RAR 电子版格式、题目 20 字以内、中英文摘要与关键词、中图分类号(TP)、GB/T 7714 参考文献中英文对照、图形结果与演示视频的匿名化、学术不端查重、栏目归属与退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份计算机图形学/CAD/可视化/VR 方向的中文原创论文打磨到符合本刊同行评议门槛的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 组织附录、补充材料与多媒体附件(尤其演示视频)时调用。覆盖按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、图形学论文特有的演示视频/交互录屏/高分辨率渲染图/额外几何结果的归属、补充材料的匿名化与格式(DOC/PDF/ZIP/RAR/视频编码)、以及正文自足性(不依赖补充材料才能读懂主张)。适用于把决定性证据留正文、把扩展性材料稳妥外置、避免正文臃肿或关键证据被埋没的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 选题定位、判断稿件是否落在本刊图形学/CAD 版图、以及在兄弟中文刊之间选择落点时调用。覆盖本刊图像视频处理、可视化与可视分析、CAD/CAE/CAM、VR/AR/MR、三维图形计算与交互等栏目的边界，帮助判断选题的图形/几何增量是否充分、与综合刊《计算机学报》和软件方向《软件学报》如何分工、以及该选研究论文还是综述。适用于动笔前确认选题契合、避免因不符宗旨在初审被退的场景。

在需要《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 投稿从选题到见刊的全流程时间线与技能编排时调用。把 12 个技能串成一条弧线：选题契合(图形/CAD 版图)→中文写作体例→相关工作 delta→图形/几何实验→可复现与制品→补充材料/演示视频→投稿就绪审计→审稿流程→修回答复→录用定稿校样，并标注每阶段的关键产物、易变待核实项与决策点。适用于统筹一次 JCAD&CG 投稿、明确当前处于哪一步与下一步该调用哪个技能的场景。

在为《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》(Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, JCAD&CG) 撰写或打磨中文论文体例时调用。覆盖报道性中英文摘要(问题/方法/结果/结论四要素)、中英文关键词、中图分类号(TP 系列)、题目 20 字以内、GB/T 7714 参考文献且中文文献中英文对照、量与单位法定计量、图题表题中英文规范、以及图形学论文首页范式(问题→现状不足→贡献→图形证据→意义)。适用于把图形/几何/可视化/CAD 稿件写到符合本刊中文科技写作规范、避免因体例不合在初审被退补正的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件准备代码与数据可用性材料时调用。本刊未设独立的会议式 artifact evaluation 徽章体系，本技能讲清这一现状，并给出可迁移的最佳实践：双盲评审下的匿名代码/数据托管、诚实的可用性说明、目录结构与 README、许可与合规、录用后实名永久化，以及专题稿件可能的补充材料约定。适用于把一份 JCRD 稿件的代码、数据集与实验脚本整理到审稿人可核验、见刊后可复现的可用性水平的场景。

在收到《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 外审意见、需要撰写审稿意见答复与修回说明时调用。覆盖多轮修回（初审→外审→复审→终审）下的逐条回应结构、把每条意见映射到正文可追踪修改、双盲评审下不泄露作者身份的中性措辞、对分歧意见的礼貌反驳与折中、修改稿标红/修订说明的组织、以及专题稿件面向客座编辑的补充答复。适用于把一份带修改意见的 JCRD 稿件转化为一份让责任编辑与外审专家能快速核对的修回材料的场景。

在《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件被录用后、进入定稿与校样阶段时调用。覆盖从双盲版恢复作者与单位署名、补全基金项目号与作者简介、通信作者与联系方式、中英文题名摘要关键词与中图分类号终校、GB/T 7714 参考文献终审、图表清晰度与版式规范、校样(清样)逐轮校对与修改幅度限制、DOI 与元数据核对、以及录用后代码/数据链接永久化。适用于把一份已录用的中文稿件安全推进到科学出版社正式出版、避免校样阶段引入错误或超范围改动的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件设计与呈现实验时调用。覆盖研究问题到证据的匹配、公开数据集与真实系统的选择、可信基线与公平对比、评价指标与统计显著性、消融与敏感性分析、真实平台的性能能效度量、大模型/挖掘类研究的防污染与来源钉死、以及图表与结果呈现规范。适用于把一份计算机学科的中文稿件的实验部分做到能经受本刊双盲外审审视、证据充分且可复现的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件撰写相关工作或文献综述时调用。覆盖综述型稿件的分类框架构建、原创稿件相关工作的 delta 定位、系统性文献检索与纳入排除标准、中英文文献并重的覆盖度、双盲评审下自引的第三人称处理、以及面向本刊专题(综述与原创并重)的综述组织。适用于把一份 JCRD 稿件的文献部分从罗列改写成有分类框架与清晰定位、既覆盖国内外进展又突出本文贡献差异的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件构建可复现性与实验可重复证据时调用。覆盖环境与依赖版本固定、随机种子与非确定性控制、数据集版本与抽取日期钉死、大模型/API 输出缓存、硬件与度量口径记录、双盲下的匿名可运行材料、诚实的可用性说明，以及让外审专家在不联系作者情况下重跑主结果的组织方式。适用于把一份 JCRD 中文稿件的实验做到可被第三方在受控条件下重复、并经得起外审可复现质疑的场景。

在需要理解或建模《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 审稿流程、预估周期与决定作者应对策略时调用。覆盖编辑初审→专家外审→复审→主编终审的多轮结构、双盲评审机制（外审只见内容不见身份）、录用/退修/退稿的决定类型、多轮修回的节奏、专题稿件由客座编辑参与的流程、以及作者在各环节的杠杆点与常见状态解读。适用于收到某一审稿状态后校准预期、或在投稿前了解本刊评审如何运作以便针对性准备的场景。

在向《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 crad.ict.ac.cn 在线投稿系统、只收中文稿规则、双盲评审的匿名清扫（正文/致谢/基金号/自引/文件属性）、官方 Word/LaTeX 模板、中英文题名摘要关键词与中图分类号(TP)、GB/T 7714 参考文献、稿件类型与栏目/专题归属、学术不端自查与一稿多投规避，并在提交前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份计算机学科的中文原创或综述稿件打磨到符合本刊双盲多轮同行评审门槛的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 稿件规划附录、补充材料与多媒体附件时调用。覆盖正文与补充材料的划分原则（决定录用的证据必须在正文内）、附录中放什么（完整证明、超参表、扩展实验、算法细节）、双盲评审下补充材料的匿名要求、专题稿件可能的补充约定、多媒体/大数据附件的提交方式与命名规范，以及与代码数据可用性材料的分工。适用于把一份 JCRD 中文长文的核心证据与补充证据合理分层、既不臃肿正文又不把关键证据藏进附录的场景。

在为一份计算机学科中文稿件判断是否投《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD)、以及投常规栏目还是对口专题时调用。覆盖本刊征稿范围与稿件类型匹配、专题(special topic)组稿机制与当期专题主题对接、综述与原创的形态选择、与姊妹刊（计算机学报、软件学报、自动化学报、电子学报、计算机科学）的选路，以及专题客座编辑与截稿时间表的核对。适用于在动笔前判断选题与栏目定位、把工作放到最匹配的落点以提高录用概率的场景。

在需要为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 投稿编排从选题到出版的完整流程时调用。覆盖选题与栏目/专题定位、证据构建（实验或综述）、中文长文写作、双盲投稿、编辑初审到外审复审终审的多轮评审、审稿意见答复与修回、录用后定稿校样、以及代码数据可用性与专题时间表的协同。适用于把一篇计算机学科的中文稿件的整个投稿生命周期倒排成有序里程碑、明确各阶段该调用哪个技能的场景。

在为《计算机研究与发展》(Journal of Computer Research and Development, JCRD) 撰写或润色中文科技论文、需要符合本刊写作规范时调用。覆盖中英文题名、中文摘要五要素与英文摘要对应、关键词与 Key words、中图分类号(TP)、量单位符号国标、术语与符号统一、图表三线表与公式编号、GB/T 7714 顺序编码制参考文献中英文对照著录、以及双盲评审下的第三人称自引与匿名措辞。适用于把一份计算机学科的中文原创或综述稿件打磨到符合本刊格式与语言规范、避免形式退修的场景。

Use when sharpening the one-sentence contribution of a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript so the novelty reads as a psychological PROCESS, not an effect. Frames the contribution; it does not build the theory (jcp-theory-development) or run analyses (jcp-data-analysis).

Use when analyzing experimental data for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — ANOVA/regression on the effect, measured and experimental mediation, moderation and moderated mediation, measurement of the process, and the rigor-era reporting standards. Analyzes the studies; it does not design them (jcp-methods).

Use when staking a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript's contribution against the consumer-psychology literature and its siblings (JCR, JMR, Marketing Science, Psychological Science). Positions the mechanism as new; it does not build the theory (jcp-theory-development) or design studies (jcp-methods).

Use when designing or stress-testing the experiments for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — manipulations, controls and confounds, manipulation checks, power, the multi-study chain, and pre-registration. Designs the studies that test the process; it does not analyze them (jcp-data-analysis).

Use when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point response, and showing the mechanism is now nailed. Drafts the rebuttal; for reading the letter and feasibility see jcp-review-process.

Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer model, what "process is thin" really means, R&R norms, and the new-studies expectation. Sets expectations and revision strategy; the response letter itself is jcp-rebuttal.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — manuscript type and length, APA formatting, double-blind anonymization, the open-science / data-materials package, and the Wiley ScholarOne portal. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building the exhibits for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — condition-means tables, mediation/moderation path figures, interaction plots, and APA-formatted statistical reporting that makes the process visible. Builds the exhibits; it does not run the analysis (jcp-data-analysis).

Use when building the psychological theory and hypotheses for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — naming the mechanism (mediator), deriving theory-predicted moderators, and ruling out rival processes. Builds the mechanism that IS the contribution; it does not run the studies (jcp-methods).

Use when deciding whether a consumer phenomenon belongs at the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) versus a sibling, and which JCP manuscript type fits, before theory and studies are locked. Sets scope and outlet fit; it does not build the mechanism (jcp-theory-development).

Use when deciding which jcp-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when writing or revising the prose of a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript — the process-led intro, the abstract, the theory build, and the APA-style voice — so the mechanism, not the effect, is the story. Polishes the writing; it does not change the design or analysis.

Use when the design that isolates a behavioral mechanism is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript — lab/field experiment, observational causal design, or simulation. Stress-tests experimental and observational identification to JEBO's behavioral-credibility bar; it does not write prose or build the deposit.

Use when staking a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript's contribution against the behavioral, experimental, and organizational literatures. Builds the "what we knew / what was missing / what this adds" frame and a replication/extension stance; it does not invent citations.

Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering concessions vs. pushback, and re-running experiments where required. Plans the revision and response letter; it does not run the new analysis.

Use when anticipating the objections a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) referee will raise before submitting — demand effects, mechanism-vs-alternative, external validity, sibling-journal fit. Pre-empts the modal JEBO referee; it does not draft the rebuttal to a received report.