Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Educational Psychology via Editorial Manager — masked-review anonymization, the 12,000-word format and 250-word abstract, APA 7th-edition style, JARS reporting, and the Transparency and Openness subsection with data/materials/code identifiers. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building tables and figures for a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript. JEP uses APA 7th-edition style and expects exhibits that report multilevel/SEM model results, effect sizes with uncertainty, and growth trajectories clearly, and that are anonymized for masked review. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

Use when stating the learning/motivation theory and hypotheses for a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript. JEP expects a clear psychological mechanism, directional hypotheses tied to that theory, and an honest separation of confirmatory (ideally preregistered) from exploratory analyses. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

Use when deciding whether an educational-psychology project fits the Journal of Educational Psychology and which manuscript type to target. JEP wants original, primary psychological research on learning and instruction that matters for real educational settings; it does not typically publish single-instrument reliability/validity studies. Frames the question; it does not collect data.

Use when starting or navigating any Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript and you are unsure which sub-skill applies. Use when choosing among manuscript types (primary empirical study, multi-study package, exceptionally important meta-analysis) or returning with a decision letter. Routes by lifecycle stage and flags the journal's masked review, 12,000-word format, APA 7th style, and Transparency and Openness requirements. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

Use when drafting or polishing a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript to fit its format — generally under 12,000 words (excluding references/tables/figures/appendices), a 250-word abstract, APA 7th-edition style, double-spaced, and fully masked for blind review. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — an environmental-policy causal design, a climate/weather IV, or a revealed- or stated-preference valuation. Stress-tests the data-to-welfare mapping before exhibits are finalized; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript relative to the environmental-economics frontier and its sibling journals is fuzzy or undersold. Stakes the claim against the field; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) decision letter or referee report needs a response strategy — triaging R&R demands, planning new spatial/valuation robustness, and writing the response letter the editor and field referees expect. Plans the revision; it loops back to the analysis skills for the actual work.

Use when pre-empting the objections a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) referee will raise — the environmental-economist's reflexes on sorting, spatial SEs, leakage, hypothetical bias, and scope — before submission or in an R&R. Anticipates and defuses pushback; it does not replace the rebuttal letter (jeem-rebuttal).

Use when assembling the data and code deposit for a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — meeting JEEM's data-availability/replication expectation, documenting monitoring/satellite/admin/restricted environmental data, and writing a README that reproduces every exhibit. Builds the package; it does not run the analysis or invent data.

Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript's headline estimate — a damage, WTP, pass-through, or treatment effect — must be shown to survive specification, spatial, sample, and inference choices. Builds the targeted robustness suite environmental-economics referees expect; it does not establish primary identification (jeem-identification) or format exhibits (jeem-tables-figures).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — the scope/style desk-screen, submission fee, abstract/length limits, data-availability statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — regression tables, event-study plots, maps, WTP/demand-curve figures — do not yet show the environmental signal cleanly. Designs publication-grade exhibits in JEEM/Elsevier house style; it does not run the analysis (jeem-robustness) or write the prose (jeem-writing-style).

Use when a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript needs a resource/pollution-control or dynamic-resource model that earns its place — generating a testable comparative static or a policy-relevant welfare expression, not decorating an empirical result. Sharpens the model; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when scoping or scope-testing a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript — confirming the environmental/resource mechanism is load-bearing and the question clears the field-journal bar before any analysis is finalized. Decides fit and routes; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when deciding which jeem-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scoping through rebuttal for a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when the introduction, abstract, or prose of a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript misses the field voice — when the environmental mechanism → welfare → policy chain is buried or the contribution does not land in the first page. Polishes the framing late; it does not establish identification or results.

Use when the market-data design and microstructure measurement are the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — TAQ/order-book cleaning, liquidity and price-impact construction, sample filters. Hardens measurement; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — causal effects on market quality, or what pins down a microstructure model. Stress-tests the design against JFM's microstructure-insider bar before exhibits are finalized.

Use when assembling the Internet Appendix, data codebook, and replication materials for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — what stays in the main text vs. the appendix, and the TAQ/proprietary-data access path. Organizes supporting material; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when positioning a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript against the microstructure frontier and its broad-finance siblings — staking a contribution the markets-literature insiders will recognize. Positions; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when drafting the response to an R&R or referee report for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — turning microstructure objections into a point-by-point response and a revised draft. Plans and drafts the rebuttal; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when anticipating the microstructure referee's objections for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — a pre-submission pre-mortem and, post-decision, a triage of the report. Anticipates and triages; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when results may be sensitive to liquidity-measure choice, sample filters, microstructure noise, or inference for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript. Builds the design-based robustness ledger; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — file set, blinding, declarations, data statement, and house formatting. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when microstructure exhibits — spreads, depth, price-impact, order-flow, and event-study plots — are the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript. Sharpens the exhibits; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when deciding whether a question belongs at the Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) — i.e., whether it is genuinely about market microstructure / how markets trade rather than broad asset pricing or corporate finance. Scopes and reroutes; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when deciding which jfm-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript from topic selection through rebuttal. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized microstructure-focused skills.

Use when the prose, intro, and abstract are the bottleneck for a Journal of Financial Markets (JFM) manuscript — making the trading mechanism land for microstructure insiders. Late-stage polish; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript — quasi-experimental health-policy variation, selection into insurance/treatment, eligibility RD, or structural identification of demand/provider parameters. Stress-tests the data-to-estimand mapping to the JHE bar before exhibits are finalized; it does not write prose or build the package.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript relative to the health-economics frontier is fuzzy or undersold. Stakes the marginal contribution against the right health-econ literatures; it does not run the analysis or invent citations.

Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jhe-identification / jhe-robustness) or the submission preflight.

Use when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission. Anticipates and disarms likely pushback; it does not draft the response letter after a decision (jhe-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight.

Use when assembling the data, code, and access documentation for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript — where much health data is restricted (claims, administrative, EHR) and the journal's policy encourages rather than mandates deposit. Packages reproducibility and a credible restricted-data access path; it does not run the analysis.

Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) result must be shown stable to specification, sample, inference, and mechanism threats before submission or in response to referees. Organizes robustness by identifying threat; it does not establish the design (jhe-identification) or build exhibits.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — single-anonymized review, keywords, declarations, data-availability statement, and the no-length-limit/short-paper allowance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building or revising the exhibits of a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript so the health-policy result is legible at a glance and the institutional/identification logic is visible. Formats exhibits; it does not establish the result (jhe-identification / jhe-robustness) or write prose.

Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript needs a model — insurance demand/selection, provider behavior under a payment rule, or a health-production/human-capital frame — to interpret estimates or run a counterfactual. Disciplines the conceptual frame; it does not establish identification (jhe-identification) or write prose.

Use when deciding whether a question is a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) paper at all — is it a genuine health-economics contribution, not a public-finance or labor paper with health as a thin application. Frames the question and audience; it does not run the analysis or invent citations.

Use when deciding which jhe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when the prose of a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript buries the question or the policy stakes — abstract, introduction, and the institutional setup. Shapes the writing so a health economist sees the contribution fast; it does not establish results or build exhibits.

Use when articulating what a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript contributes — converting results into theory advances for international marketing and decisions for border-crossing managers, and defending against the "context extension" verdict. It frames the payoff; jim-writing-style polishes the prose.

Use when estimating and reporting results for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — measurement-invariance testing (MGCFA/alignment), multilevel models with country-level predictors, multi-group SEM, and multi-country panels. It executes and reports; jim-methods designed the study.

Use when locating a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript inside the international marketing literature — mapping the conversation, building the positioning table, and pre-empting the "incremental extension" verdict. It positions the claim; jim-contribution-framing writes the payoff.

Use when designing a multi-country or cross-cultural study for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — country selection, sampling and translation equivalence, measurement-invariance planning, cross-cultural experiments, and export/entry-mode secondary data. It designs; jim-data-analysis estimates and reports.

Use when responding to a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) decision letter — triaging reviewer demands, deciding whether to collect new-country data, and writing the point-by-point response. It manages the revision round; the upstream skills execute the actual fixes.

Use when a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript is under review or about to be — understanding the editorial pipeline, decision categories, desk-reject triggers, and how to wait productively. It explains the process; jim-rebuttal handles the response once a letter arrives.

Use when running the final preflight for a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) submission — the ScholarOne portal, the two-file anonymized package, formatting caps, and declarations. It clears the runway; post-decision strategy belongs to jim-rebuttal.

Use when building or pruning the exhibits of a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript — the invariance table, per-country descriptives, cross-level model figures, and fitting everything inside the 50-page all-inclusive cap. It shapes exhibits; jim-data-analysis produced the numbers.