Use when deciding which jleo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jleo Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jleo-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jleo-workflow
description: Use when deciding which jleo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
---
# JLEO Workflow Router (jleo-workflow)
## Overview
This is the router. It tells you **which jleo-* skill to use at the current stage** of a manuscript aimed at *The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization* (JLEO) — the **Oxford University Press** journal founded in **1985 by Oliver E. Williamson and Jerry L. Mashaw** at Yale, and the flagship outlet of the law-economics-**organization** tradition: transaction-cost economics, the theory of the firm, contracts and governance, and **positive political economy** (courts, legislatures, bureaucracies, federalism as institutions in the North–Weingast–Williamson line). It publishes both **formal-theoretical** and **empirical** work, triannually; Andrea Prat is Editor-in-Chief (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as JLEO. Operational tells that you are at JLEO and not a sibling: the paper's payoff is an **institutional or organizational** claim, not a price-theory or pure-doctrine one; the question is "how does this governance structure / institution / political mechanism work and why does it take the form it does," and the contribution speaks to the **new-institutional / PPE** community. Submission is via the **Editorial Express** portal (editorialexpress.com/jleo); OUP is the publisher; the journal is COPE-compliant. Re-verify volatile specifics (editor, fees, exact limits, blinding) on the official OUP pages.
## When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?" on a JLEO-bound manuscript
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed against the law-economics-organization bar
- Work is ping-ponging between framing, theory/model, identification, exhibits, and the response letter
- A JLEO decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
- The team is unsure whether the paper belongs at JLEO versus JLE, JLS, ALER, QJPS, or Organization Science
## Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|-----------------|------------|
| Scope/fit uncertain; might be price-theory L&E or pure org-theory | `jleo-topic-selection` |
| Contribution vs. the institutional/PPE frontier is fuzzy or undersold | `jleo-literature-positioning` |
| Causal credibility (reform, court/committee assignment, institutional variation) is shaky | `jleo-identification` |
| The institutional/organizational model or mechanism is loose or decorative | `jleo-theory-model` |
| Results may be specification-, sample-, or inference-sensitive | `jleo-robustness` |
| Exhibits are dense or do not answer the institutional question | `jleo-tables-figures` |
| Prose buries the institutional logic; intro/abstract do not land | `jleo-writing-style` |
| Data, code, or institutional-source documentation needs packaging | `jleo-replication-package` |
| Likely referee objections should be anticipated before submitting | `jleo-referee-strategy` |
| Ready to submit via Editorial Express; need a preflight | `jleo-submission` |
| A decision letter or referee report needs a response plan | `jleo-rebuttal` |
## Default order
1. `jleo-topic-selection` — lock a law-economics-**organization** question, not a sibling's
2. `jleo-literature-positioning` — stake the contribution vs. the institutional/PPE frontier
3. `jleo-identification` — institutional/organizational causal design where the paper is empirical
4. `jleo-theory-model` — the transaction-cost / agency / political-agency model that gives the claim teeth
5. `jleo-robustness` — threat-organized checks, not a mechanical appendix
6. `jleo-tables-figures` — exhibits that show the institutional comparison cleanly
7. `jleo-writing-style` — make the institutional logic land (intro + abstract last)
8. `jleo-replication-package` — institutional/organizational/political data paths and code
9. `jleo-referee-strategy` — anticipate the institutional-economist referee
10. `jleo-submission` — Editorial Express preflight
11. `jleo-rebuttal` — after the decision letter
> `jleo-writing-style` is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and identification settle. Theory and empirics co-evolve at JLEO — `jleo-theory-model` and `jleo-identification` often loop.
## Routing by paper archetype
JLEO accepts several shapes, and the binding constraint differs by shape. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|-----------|-------------------------|----------|
| positive political economy model (legislature/court/bureaucracy) | comparative statics + an empirical or institutional test | `jleo-theory-model` → `jleo-identification` |
| transaction-cost / make-or-buy / governance-choice empirics | selection into governance form; endogenous boundaries | `jleo-identification` |
| contracts & theory of the firm (formal) | a sharp, novel mechanism vs. the canon | `jleo-theory-model` |
| institutions & reform (causal) | reform/assignment as a credible design, not OLS+controls | `jleo-identification` |
| organizational governance / personnel inside firms | mechanism + measurement of the organizational object | `jleo-topic-selection` → `jleo-theory-model` |
## Sibling boundaries (why JLEO and not its neighbors)
- **vs. Journal of Law and Economics (JLE, Chicago):** JLE is price-theory law-and-economics — antitrust, regulation, crime, empirical effects of legal rules on markets. JLEO adds **organization**: governance structures, the firm, and the political institutions that make and enforce rules. If the payoff is a market effect of a rule, lean JLE; if it is *why the institution/organization takes this form*, lean JLEO.
- **vs. Journal of Legal Studies (JLS):** JLS is broader law-and-economics with more doctrinal/legal-theory range; JLEO is tighter on institutions, organization, and PPE.
- **vs. Quarterly Journal of Political Science (QJPS) / American Political Science Review:** those are political-science homes for PPE; JLEO welcomes PPE but frames it as institutional **economics** with formal or empirical economics standards.
- **vs. American Law and Economics Review (ALER):** ALER is the AALEA's broad L&E outlet; JLEO is more organization- and governance-centric.
- **vs. Organization Science:** Org Science is management/org-theory (behavioral, sociological); JLEO is economics of organization (transaction costs, agency, formal incentives).
## Anti-patterns
- Treating JLEO as interchangeable with JLE (price-theory) or Organization Science (org-theory)
- Submitting a pure reduced-form market study with no institutional/organizational object as the payoff
- Polishing prose before the model and identification are stable
- Letting an appendix carry the institutional claim the main text must establish
- Quoting volatile process facts (editor, fee, blinding) as permanent instead of marking 待核实
## Output format
```text
【Target】The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO)
【Archetype】PPE model / TCE governance empirics / contracts-theory / institutions-causal / org-governance
【Current bottleneck】fit / contribution / identification / model / robustness / exhibits / style / submission / revision
【Next skill】<one jleo-* skill>
【Reason】why this is the binding constraint for an institutional/organizational claim
【Source check】official facts verified or marked 待核实
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!