Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when assembling the data, code, and experimental-materials deposit for a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript — z-Tree/oTree code, instructions, raw and analysis data, and an Elsevier Research Data / Mendeley Data statement. Builds a reproducible package; it does not run the analysis.

Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) result may be fragile to demand effects, multiple comparisons, specification, or tuning. Organizes robustness by the behavioral threat each check addresses — for experiments, observational designs, and simulations; it does not redesign the identification or write the prose.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) via Elsevier Editorial Manager — abstract/keyword/JEL limits, author-date references, single-anonymized formatting, declarations, and the experimental-materials attachments. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript's exhibits must make a behavioral comparison legible — treatment bar charts, by-round dynamics, distribution plots, regression tables. Builds exhibits that show the mechanism; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript needs a behavioral or bounded-rationality model to organize, predict, or interpret its evidence. Right-sizes theory in a pluralist journal — from a sharp testable prediction to a standalone behavioral model or agent-based simulation; it does not design the identification or build the package.

Use when deciding whether a behavioral, experimental, or organizational question fits the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) rather than a sibling outlet, and how to frame it. Sharpens scope and the behavioral hook; it does not invent evidence, editors, or citations.

Use when deciding which jebo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) submission. Routes by paper archetype — experiment, observational/behavioral empirics, behavioral theory, or agent-based simulation — but does not replace the specialized skills.

Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) manuscript's prose buries the behavioral mechanism, or the abstract and introduction do not land for a pluralist behavioral audience. Shapes the mechanism-forward narrative and Elsevier-format front matter; it does not change the analysis.

Use when the inference argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript — spatial causal designs, quantitative-spatial model identification, or case-based geographic inference. Stress-tests the strategy to JEG's two-community bar before exhibits are finalized.

Use when staking a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript's contribution against both the geographical-economics and human-geography frontiers, and against sibling journals. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent citations.

Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Structures the rebuttal; it does not invent results or concede the core claim.

Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript, where the panel typically pairs an economist with a geographer. Maps likely cross-disciplinary objections to fixes; it does not invent results.

Use when assembling data, code, and spatial-data documentation for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript. Builds a credible, shareable package under JEG's encouragement-based post-acceptance policy; it does not invent data.

Use when results for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript may be sensitive to spatial scale, the weight matrix, spatial autocorrelation, sample, or specification. Organizes robustness by spatial threat; it does not invent results.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript via OUP / ScholarOne — word and abstract limits, double-anonymous scrub, ORCID, keywords/JEL, and house style. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when exhibits — especially maps — for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript are dense, decorative, or do not answer the spatial question. Makes maps and tables argue; it does not invent results.

Use when the model or conceptual frame is the bottleneck for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript — NEG / quantitative-spatial models OR conceptual frameworks from human geography. Makes the mechanism legible to both communities; it does not invent results.

Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript so it genuinely bridges geographical economics and human geography. Tests two-community fit and scope; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Use when deciding which jegeo-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when the prose, intro, or abstract of a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript must reach economists and geographers at once. Tunes voice, structure, and the 100-word abstract; it does not invent results.

Use when assigning JEL classification codes to a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey and relating the survey to the JEL code taxonomy that the journal itself maintains. Explains and applies the codes correctly; it does not write prose (jel-writing-style) or run the submission preflight (jel-submission).

Use when calibrating completeness vs. selectivity and ensuring fairness across schools, authors, and controversies in a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — including not over-promoting the author's own work. Audits coverage and even-handedness; it does not design the framework (jel-organizing-framework) or write prose (jel-writing-style).

Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

Use when systematically gathering, reading, and synthesizing a large body of economic research for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — coverage discipline and avoiding citation gaps. Builds the evidence corpus and synthesis notes; it does not impose the analytical spine (jel-organizing-framework) or write prose.

Use when imposing an analytical structure or taxonomy on a literature for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — the "spine" that turns a reading list into an argument about the field. Designs the framework; it does not gather the literature (jel-literature-synthesis) or judge balance (jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance).

Use when pitching a survey to the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) editor before writing it — the ~10-page proposal route, the pre-proposal email, and understanding the commissioning process. Builds the proposal; it does not write the survey or run the AEA portal preflight (jel-submission).

Use when responding to editor and referee feedback on a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — coverage gaps, balance complaints, framework/structure asks, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or redesign the spine from scratch (jel-organizing-framework).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) proposal or full survey via the AEA ScholarOne portal — proposal vs. full-paper route, disclosure statements, JEL codes, AEA data/code policy, and style-guide compliance. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building exhibits for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — summary "who-found-what" tables, conceptual/framework figures, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies. Designs survey exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (a JEL survey reports no new estimates of its own).

Use when judging whether a literature is a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)-scale survey topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of synthesis — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the survey's animating question; it does not gather or synthesize the literature (that is jel-literature-synthesis).

Use when deciding which jel-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a survey/review article from topic selection through revision for a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when revising a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey for the JEL voice — authoritative, accessible to non-specialist economists, long-form, signposted, with a strong opening and abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (jel-organizing-framework) or assign codes (jel-classification-system).

Use when translating technical results, models, and methods into plain language for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article — minimizing jargon and notation without dumbing down. Handles language and translation of ideas; defer evidence/number presentation to jep-evidence-without-equations and exhibits to jep-exhibits-for-general-readers.

Use when a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article must treat competing views and policy debates fairly — synthesis, not advocacy — and acknowledge uncertainty honestly. Audits balance and tone; defer evidence presentation to jep-evidence-without-equations and structure to jep-narrative-arc.

Use when working with the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editorial team — the managing-editor-led model and the symposium structure — on scope, length, framing, and the invited/commissioned process. Handles editor interaction strategy; defer the final submission preflight to jep-submission and post-decision edits to jep-revision.

Use when presenting empirical or theoretical evidence credibly in a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article with minimal math — intuition, examples, well-chosen numbers, and honest caveats. Handles how evidence is conveyed in prose; defer figures/tables to jep-exhibits-for-general-readers and fairness across studies to jep-balance-and-objectivity.

Use when designing figures and tables for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article aimed at a broad audience — clarity over density, self-explanatory exhibits. Handles exhibit design; defer prose evidence to jep-evidence-without-equations and overall structure to jep-narrative-arc.

Use when structuring a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article as a story/argument for a general economist reader rather than a literature survey. Builds the essay's spine (hook → tension → synthesis → takeaways); it does not handle sentence-level voice or evidence presentation.

Use when crafting a proposal to the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editors — a short article proposal or a symposium pitch — since JEP is largely invited and editor-organized. Builds the pitch and its contents; it does not write the full article or run the final submission preflight.

Use when responding to Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editor feedback — accessibility, balance, length, and framing — on an invited or accepted article. Plans the revision and the reply to the editorial team; it does not draft the original article or run the submission preflight.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) proposal or manuscript — email-based submission, the accessibility bar, AEA front matter and disclosure, JEL codes, and open-access status. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when deciding whether a topic is right for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) — broadly interesting, timely, and synthesizable for non-specialists — rather than a narrow research contribution. Judges venue fit; it does not draft the article or the proposal.

Use when deciding which jep-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing work on an accessible synthesis article from topic idea through editor revision for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when revising sentence-level voice and the abstract/opening for a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article — engaging, clear, authoritative-but-readable, minimal notation. Polishes prose and front matter; defer structure to jep-narrative-arc and evidence framing to jep-evidence-without-equations.

Use when analyzing and reporting results for a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript. JEP expects analyses that respect nesting (multilevel/SEM/growth models), report educationally meaningful effect sizes with confidence intervals, test mechanisms (mediation/moderation), and follow JARS with full disclosure. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

Use when positioning a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript against the educational-psychology literature. JEP gives more room than a short-report journal (up to ~12,000 words), but the contribution must still be stated as a precise advance over the closest prior learning/instruction work, not a survey. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

Use when meeting the Journal of Educational Psychology's open-science requirements — the Transparency and Openness subsection stating data/materials/analysis-code availability with persistent identifiers, JARS-compliant reporting, preregistration disclosure (encouraged, not mandatory), and Open Science Badges. Prepares compliance for masked review; it does not waive requirements.

Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. JEP R&Rs often demand added methodological rigor (multilevel modeling, cluster-level power, mechanism tests), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency, and the response must address every point while keeping the paper within format and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

Use when you need to understand how the Journal of Educational Psychology evaluates a manuscript — masked peer review, editorial weighting of educational relevance, theory, design rigor (nesting/power), and transparency, desk-reject patterns, and the role of preregistration and JARS. Use when stress-testing a paper before submission or interpreting a decision letter. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Use when designing studies for a Journal of Educational Psychology manuscript so they meet the journal's standards for educational settings — nesting (students in classes/schools), cluster-level power, measurement of learning constructs, ecological validity, and preregistration where appropriate. Strengthens the design and pre-analysis plan; it does not write code.