Use when crafting a proposal to the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editors — a short article proposal or a symposium pitch — since JEP is largely invited and editor-organized. Builds the pitch and its contents; it does not write the full article or run the final submission preflight.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jep-proposal-and-symposium --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Jep Proposal And Symposium?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jep-proposal-and-symposium)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: jep-proposal-and-symposium
description: Use when crafting a proposal to the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editors — a short article proposal or a symposium pitch — since JEP is largely invited and editor-organized. Builds the pitch and its contents; it does not write the full article or run the final submission preflight.
---
# Proposal & Symposium Pitch (jep-proposal-and-symposium)
## When to trigger
- You have a JEP-fit topic (`jep-topic-selection`) and need to approach the editors
- You are tempted to write a full unsolicited manuscript (don't — pitch first)
- You want to propose a *symposium* (a themed cluster of articles)
- An editor invited "a short proposal" and you need to know what goes in it
## Why a proposal, not a manuscript
JEP articles are **primarily solicited by the editorial team**, and even unsolicited ideas should enter as a **2–5 page proposal**, not a finished paper (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). Historically only about **10–15%** of published articles originate as unsolicited proposals, so the proposal is the real competition — it must convince the editors that a *broad, accessible, balanced* article exists here and that *you* can write it. Send proposals and papers as Word or PDF email attachments to **jep@aeapubs.org** (re-confirm the address on the official page).
## What a single-article proposal contains
A JEP proposal is a persuasive 2–5 page document, not an abstract. Cover, in plain language:
1. **The question and why it matters now** — one paragraph a non-specialist editor grasps immediately (the `jep-topic-selection` "why now").
2. **The synthesis you will deliver** — what body of work you will distill and the *through-line* (not a chapter list). What will a reader *understand* after reading that they didn't before?
3. **Three to five takeaways** — the memorable points the article will land. This is the spine; if you can't list them, the article isn't ready.
4. **Balance plan** — the competing views/debates you will treat fairly, and the open questions you will flag (signals you are writing synthesis, not advocacy).
5. **Accessibility plan** — how you will keep it readable by 90% of AEA members (intuition over notation; examples; selective evidence).
6. **Your standing to write it** — why you can synthesize this fairly (often your own work plus command of the broader literature).
7. **Rough shape** — approximate length and 2–4 exhibits you envision (not a full outline).
## Symposium pitch (the JEP-distinctive move)
A symposium is **3–5 complementary articles** on one theme, often by different authors, that together give a rounded view. To propose one:
- **Frame** the unifying question and why a multi-angle treatment beats a single article.
- **Slate** the angles (and, if you can, candidate authors) so the set is *balanced* — including dissenting or contrasting perspectives, not a like-minded panel.
- **Differentiate** each piece so they complement rather than overlap.
- **Acknowledge** the editors own the final lineup, framing, and invitations; you are offering a structure they can shape.
## Checklist
- [ ] Proposal is 2–5 pages, plain language, persuasive (not an abstract, not a manuscript)
- [ ] Question + "why now" stated in the first paragraph
- [ ] The synthesis through-line is explicit (not "I will review the literature")
- [ ] 3–5 concrete takeaways listed
- [ ] Balance + accessibility plans stated
- [ ] Symposium pitch (if any) names complementary, balanced angles and concedes editor control
- [ ] Addressed/emailed per the current official instructions (jep@aeapubs.org)
## Anti-patterns
- Submitting a **full manuscript** instead of a proposal (against JEP's stated preference)
- A proposal that is really an abstract — no through-line, no takeaways, no balance plan
- "I will survey everything" — JEP wants a curated argument, not exhaustive coverage (that's JEL)
- A symposium of like-minded authors that reads as a coordinated campaign, not a balanced conversation
- Over-promising length/scope the article cannot accessibly deliver
## Output format
```
【Pitch type】single article / symposium
【Question + why now】[...]
【Synthesis through-line】[...]
【Takeaways (3–5)】1) … 2) … 3) …
【Balance plan】competing views to treat + open questions to flag
【Accessibility plan】[...]
【Symposium slate (if any)】angle1 / angle2 / angle3 (+ balance note)
【Send to】jep@aeapubs.org (re-confirm) as Word/PDF
【Next step】jep-narrative-arc (build the essay if invited)
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!