Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when drafting the response to a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, point-by-point replies, and the revision-tracking that JFE's demanding rounds require. Drafts the response after revisions are made; it does not invent new results you have not run.

Use when anticipating and pre-empting the objections a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) referee will raise — endogeneity, fragility, multiple testing, alternative explanations. Builds a defense plan before or during review; it does not draft the post-R&R response letter (jfe-rebuttal).

Use when a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) result needs the exhaustive robustness battery the journal is known for — alternative measures, subsamples, specifications, and falsification. Builds the stress-test plan; it does not choose the core estimator (jfe-empirical-design) or the identification design (jfe-identification).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript — formatting, anonymity, references, exhibits, code/data deposit, the editorial system, and the submission fee. Checks submission readiness; it does not revise the science.

Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript need to meet house standards — readable tables, self-contained notes, and figures that carry the argument. Handles exhibit craft; it does not decide which robustness tests to run (jfe-robustness).

Use when scoping or framing a topic for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript and you need to test fit and contribution before investing in data work. Pressure-tests the question and contribution; it does not write the literature review or design the empirics.

Use when deciding which jfe-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when the prose of a Journal of Financial Economics (JFE) manuscript needs to reach the journal's register — precise, evidence-forward, and free of hedging or overclaiming. Polishes language and structure; it does not change the empirics or the contribution.

Use to frame the contribution of a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper around what it teaches about intermediation — the institution, the friction, the mechanism, and the economic consequence — so it clears the desk screen and reads as banking, not generic finance. It frames; it does not write the paper.

Use to plan and stress-test the analysis behind a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper — bank/loan-level panel work and robustness for empirics, or numerical examples and calibrated illustrations for theory. It guides the analysis plan; it does not replace running the code.

Use to audit the core analytical engine of a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper — for empirics, the causal design for a banking/credit question; for theory, the assumptions, equilibrium discipline, and proof exposition. It pressure-tests the design; it does not run the analysis.

Use when working on a Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscript to stake the contribution against the banking and financial-intermediation frontier — name the closest intermediation papers and the precise mechanism gap you fill. It positions; it does not write a standalone survey.

Use to plan an R&R response letter for the Journal of Financial Intermediation — single-blind review where referees know you, often a small number of expert reports, and an editor whose decision is final. It structures the response; it does not fabricate results.

Use to prepare the data-sharing materials a Journal of Financial Intermediation submission expects under Elsevier norms — a published Data Statement, deposited and linked datasets, and [dataset]-tagged references — without inventing a mandatory code archive the journal does not require. It prepares the package; it does not deposit for you.

Use to understand and plan around the Journal of Financial Intermediation editorial process — the active desk-rejection policy, single-anonymized (single-blind) review with a minimum of one expert referee, the editor's final and unappealable decision, and the option to choose the Managing Editor. It sets expectations; it does not draft content.

Use for the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Financial Intermediation via Editorial Manager — the US$500 non-refundable fee, single-PDF-for-review, up to 6 JEL codes and 6 keywords, optional SSRN preprint, and the mandatory generative-AI disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use to design the exhibits for a Journal of Financial Intermediation paper — banking-literate tables and figures with explicit sample construction, institution definitions, event timing, and self-contained notes. It designs exhibits; it does not run the estimation.

Use when working on Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscripts to test whether the paper is centrally about banking and financial intermediation — and whether to lead with theory or empirics — before investing in the draft.

Use as the router for a Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscript — given where you are in the banking/intermediation paper lifecycle, it names the next jfi-* skill to invoke. It coordinates; it does not draft content.

Use to revise a Journal of Financial Intermediation manuscript for the journal's house conventions — numbered sections, author–date Elsevier referencing, a concise stand-alone abstract, and prose that explains the intermediation mechanism before the specifications. It edits for style; it does not invent content.

Use to judge whether a manuscript fits 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) and to settle the line — macro-finance vs micro corporate-finance — re-routing to industrial-economics or accounting journals when the paper is not really a finance-mechanism paper.

Use when the heterogeneity analysis of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript is too coarse or atheoretical — to cut along finance-relevant dimensions (ownership, bank type, market segment, financing constraint, region) that the mechanism predicts, not arbitrary splits.

Use when the identification strategy is the bottleneck for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — policy shocks (MPA / 资管新规 / LPR / 注册制), high-frequency monetary-policy surprises, DID, IV, RDD — stress-testing the design before drafting tables.

Use to write or stress-test the institutional-background section of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — stating China's financial-system detail accurately (regulatory rules, market segmentation, ownership), since wrong regulatory caliber or market structure is a common desk-reject trigger.

Use when the literature review for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript is a citation pile rather than a dialogue — to enter the finance lineage (international + Chinese), position the contribution against canonical channel papers, and avoid missing the field's must-cite works.

Use when the mechanism section of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript stops at "promotes / inhibits" — to pin the effect to a concrete financial channel (credit / risk-taking / balance-sheet / information) with channel-specific evidence rather than a generic mediation regression.

Use to write the policy-implication section of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — addressing the monetary authority, financial regulators, or financial institutions with implications that follow from the evidence and are more operational than 经济研究, without sliding into a policy-report tone.

Use to draft the response letter for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) revise-and-resubmit — organizing point-by-point replies to reviewers, prioritizing identification and financial-mechanism concerns, and recording exactly where the manuscript changed. Run only after the manuscript itself has been revised.

Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) — checking word count (~20k chars), ~200-char abstract, 3–5 keywords, three JEL codes, note conventions (①②③ with continuous numbering), the online submission system (jryj.org.cn), double-blind anonymity, and document hygiene. Verify every rule against the journal's current 来稿须知.

Use to finalize the main tables and figures of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript to journal house style — trimming over-wide regression tables, standardizing significance/standard-error notes, and ensuring continuous numbering of tables, figures, equations, and footnotes.

Use to sharpen the research question and contribution for a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — turning a finance data finding into a question with a clear financial-mechanism contribution and concrete relevance to China's financial system.

Use when deciding which jfr-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from fit positioning through rebuttal for 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills, and cross-refs sibling journal packs.

Frame the contribution of a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) paper — write the strict one-paragraph abstract of no more than 100 words and an introduction that states what is new in finance terms. Use to make the quantitative contribution land within JFQA's tight abstract cap and high selectivity.

Run and document the empirical analysis for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) paper — finance data construction (CRSP/Compustat/TAQ/IBES), winsorizing, fixed effects, clustered and Newey-West standard errors, robustness, and heterogeneity — so results survive double-anonymous JFQA review and reproduce from the archived code. For theory papers, lighten this and document numerical examples instead.

Build a credible identification / research design for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) empirical finance paper — portfolio sorts and Fama-MacBeth, panel fixed effects, staggered DID on regulatory shocks, IV / natural experiments, RDD at thresholds, and event studies — with the inference finance referees demand. For theoretical submissions, pivot to assumptions, results, and proof exposition.

Position a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript against the finance frontier — corporate finance, investments, asset pricing, market microstructure, and financial institutions. Use to stake a precise contribution against the relevant literature without a standalone survey, so the paper reads as new to a quantitative-finance audience.

Strategy and structure for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) revise-and-resubmit response — point-by-point replies to double-anonymous referees and the handling Managing Editor, new robustness/identification evidence, and code-archive readiness. Use when you have a JFQA R&R and need a disciplined, persuasive response letter.

Build the code and data archive required by the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) Code Sharing Policy — source code reproducing all findings, raw or pseudo datasets, and a read-me with an execution roadmap, deposited in the JFQA Dataverse at the Harvard University Dataverse. Use to prepare the mandatory archive for accepted post-2024 submissions and to request any exception at initial submission.

Explain how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) via Editorial Manager — text-searchable single PDF, 8.5x11 / 1-inch / 12-pt Times New Roman double-spaced formatting, double-anonymous anonymization, the 100-word abstract cap, the $350 fee, prior-rejection disclosure to avoid the one-year ban, and code-sharing exception timing. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Build the tables and figures for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) paper — summary statistics, main regressions, robustness, and finance-standard exhibits with self-contained notes that state sample, clustering, winsorizing, and economic magnitudes. Use to make exhibits readable under double-anonymous review and consistent with JFQA formatting.

Judge whether a research question fits the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) — empirical and quantitative financial economics (corporate finance, investments, capital and security markets, financial institutions, finance-relevant quantitative methods). Use before investing in a JFQA submission to test scope fit and the quantitative-evidence bar.

Router for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript — decides which jfqa-* skill to use next across topic selection, literature positioning, identification, data analysis, contribution framing, tables/figures, writing style, the code-sharing archive, review process, submission preflight, and R&R rebuttal. Start here when unsure what to do next.

Apply the house writing style for a Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) manuscript — precise quantitative finance prose, the strict ≤100-word one-paragraph abstract, and the prescriptive 8.5x11 / 1-inch / 12-pt Times New Roman double-spaced layout submitted as a text-searchable PDF. Use to polish a draft to JFQA conventions before submission.

Use when sharpening the Journal of Human Resources contribution claim around applied microeconomics, credible evidence, public-policy relevance, and reconciliation with prior estimates.

Use when building or auditing Journal of Human Resources empirical data, sample construction, causal estimates, robustness, comparative estimation, online appendix material, and reproducible analysis.

Use when stress-testing causal identification for a Journal of Human Resources empirical-micro manuscript, including RCT, DID, RDD, IV, event studies, decompositions, policy shocks, and reconciliation with prior estimates.

Use when positioning a Journal of Human Resources manuscript against applied microeconomics, labor, education, health, development, discrimination, retirement, and policy literatures, with explicit reconciliation to prior estimates.

Use after a Journal of Human Resources (JHR) revise-and-resubmit to plan the response letter — answering referees and the handling editor, satisfying the reconciliation and sensitivity demands, and confirming no fee applies to invited revisions. Strategy and structure; it does not write your results.

Use when preparing Journal of Human Resources data and replication materials: archive plan footnote, public repository deposit, CC0 license, Data Availability Statement, read-me file, waiver requests, RCT pre-analysis-plan statements, and code package.