Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Jibs Methods

ASecurity

Use when designing the empirical study for a Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) manuscript — matching a cross-country and/or multilevel design to the question, planning for measurement equivalence, common-method variance, and endogeneity before data collection. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (jibs-data-analysis) or build the mechanism (jibs-theory-development).

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgotestinggitperformance

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jibs-methods --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Jibs Methods?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Jibs Methods
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-jibs-methods/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-jibs-methods)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: jibs-methods
description: Use when designing the empirical study for a Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) manuscript — matching a cross-country and/or multilevel design to the question, planning for measurement equivalence, common-method variance, and endogeneity before data collection. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation (jibs-data-analysis) or build the mechanism (jibs-theory-development).
---

# Cross-Country & Multilevel Research Design (jibs-methods)

## When to trigger

- You are choosing a design for a cross-border or multi-country question
- Your data are nested (individuals in firms in countries) and you need the right structure
- You anticipate reviewers probing measurement equivalence, CMV, or endogeneity
- A reviewer says "the design cannot support a cross-country inference"

## JIBS is method-pluralistic; rigor is the gatekeeper

JIBS is **paradigmatically and methodologically pluralistic** by policy — quantitative, qualitative, mixed, and pure-theory work are all in scope. There is **no single mandated method**. But its practical center of gravity is **theory-driven, hypothesis-testing empirical work on cross-country or multilevel data**, held to demanding standards. Pick the design that fits the phenomenon, then engineer in the three rigor demands JIBS reviewers apply most insistently.

## Match the design to the claim

| Phenomenon / claim                                   | Design                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Country/culture shapes a firm or individual outcome  | Multilevel (firm/individual nested in country), with country-level predictors |
| Internationalization as a path-dependent process     | Longitudinal/dynamic panel of firms over time (FDI, entry, commitment) |
| Cross-cultural attitudes/behavior                    | Multi-country survey with translated, back-translated instruments |
| Entry-mode / location / governance choice            | Discrete-choice archival design on cross-border deals (SDC, fDi Markets) |
| Deep contextual MNE puzzle                            | Comparative / multi-country case study (qualitative)          |

## Build in JIBS's three rigor demands at the design stage

1. **Cross-national measurement equivalence.** Because constructs are studied across countries and cultures, plan multi-group measurement from the outset: identical (translated/back-translated) instruments, and a plan to test configural, metric, and scalar invariance. Equivalence is a *first-order* concern at JIBS, not an afterthought.
2. **Common-method variance (CMV).** JIBS actively gatekeeps CMV: survey/same-respondent designs that appear to suffer from CMV are routinely asked to run validity checks and resubmit, per a dedicated "From the Editors" CMV editorial. Design *procedural* remedies now — temporal/source separation, different respondents for predictor and outcome, archival anchors, a marker variable.
3. **Endogeneity / "dynamic endogeneity."** For internationalization-as-process designs, JIBS names dynamic endogeneity as a recurring demand: past internationalization, performance, and unobserved firm heterogeneity co-evolve. Plan identification now — instruments, dynamic-panel GMM, lag structure, or a natural experiment — rather than bolting it on later.

## Consult the methods-editorial canon

The AIB Research Methods SIG curates ~28 JIBS "From the Editors" methods editorials (2008–2022) on endogeneity, multilevel models, interaction effects, QCA, replication/reproducibility, CMV, and p-values. Reviewers treat these as de facto standards — align your design with the relevant editorial and cite it.

## Output format

```
【Design】multilevel / dynamic-panel / multi-country survey / archival choice / case ...
【Levels & nesting】 ... ; SE-clustering/aggregation plan
【Measurement equivalence plan】translation + configural/metric/scalar test ...
【CMV plan】procedural separations designed ...
【Endogeneity/dynamic-endogeneity plan】identification strategy ...
【FTE editorial alignment】which editorial(s) the design answers to ...
【Next step】jibs-data-analysis
```

## Anti-patterns

- Pooling countries with no plan to test measurement invariance.
- A single-source, single-wave, same-respondent cross-country survey with no CMV remedy.
- Internationalization-process design with no endogeneity strategy.
- Choosing a method by habit rather than fit to the phenomenon.

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →