Claude Skills by ashfordeOU

Use when a class 1 board carries an FPGA or CPLD. Determine the development, reuse and maintenance route a programmable logic device design takes in class 1 equipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.6.4: group the configuration technology as antifuse one-time, flash-reprogrammable or volatile, compare a reuse candidate against its baseline on device, logic and implementation axes, score the design-assurance record against what the declared origin demands, test the achieved functional coverage ag...

Use when a class 1 lot is booked into incoming quality control. Determine the receiving control plan a class 1 EEE lot owes on arrival under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.5.1: stop an untraceable, empty or paperwork-rejected lot at the door, derive the control activities the package style, source history, radiation duty and age call for, order them so every non-destructive activity closes before a destructive one consumes parts, size each sample from the delivered quantity, and return the outstandin...

Use when a Class 1 design has to show a part survives its radiation environment for the full mission. Verify that a Class 1 part's radiation tolerance covers the environment it will actually see across the whole declared mission lifetime under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.2.2.4: accumulate ionising dose and displacement damage phase by phase behind the design shielding, raise each by its radiation design margin, cut a rate-sensitive technology's capability when it was characterised at a high dose r...

Verify that a radiation-sensitive Class 1 EEE part meets its declared mission radiation environment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.3.8. Use when deciding whether heritage evidence already carries the required margin or the flight lot owes its own irradiation, crediting the lowest failure-free dose of the sample by how many parts were actually irradiated, comparing the demonstrated radiation design margin with the required one, and judging single event threshold linear energy transfer against th...

Evaluate the screening regime applied to Class 1 parts before they enter flight standard hardware. Use when a screened lot has to be dispositioned: require every delivered device to be screened for a flight build, check the performed screens against the set the part family carries, reject an unapproved screening facility, convert the burn-in actually run to its equivalent at the reference condition by an Arrhenius acceleration and report a shortfall, count devices whose monitored drift exceed...

Use when a project has to show the ground a Class 1 part choice stands on before the purchase order goes out. Assess whether a candidate Class 1 EEE part is ready to be taken to a procurement decision under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.2.1: declare every selection prerequisite as closed, open or not applicable, refuse a waiver on a blocking one, weight the prerequisites that still apply, compute a readiness index over them, list the blocking items left open, and name the single prerequisite worth c...

Use when a Class 1 build has to show its selection rules bind its subcontractors too. Audit the baseline Class 1 selection rules and how far they reach down the supply chain under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.2.2.1: declare each rule as applied, waived against a named approval, or not applied at every tier from in-house outward, refuse a chain with a gap in it, compute coverage tier by tier, take the weakest tier as the chain's reach, separate a rule missing in-house from one lost downstream, and n...

Use when a magnetic part is wound in house rather than procured to a component specification. Assess an in-house wound magnetic part built for class 1 equipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.6.8: refuse a part with no wire, core or qualified winding procedure behind it, test the winding current density, core flux utilisation, interwinding dielectric withstanding voltage and hot spot margin against recognised practice, derive the screening sequence the construction, potting state and flight lot...

Determine whether expired Class 1 EEE stock can have its storage validity restored under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 4.3.10. Use when testing stored parts against the expiry their last acceptance granted, measuring how much moisture-sensitivity floor life has been consumed to decide whether a bake precedes relifing, sizing the relifing sample, judging external visual, solderability and leak results against their accept numbers, and re-granting a shortened storage period from the relifing date. Refus...

Assess an alert, errata sheet or manufacturer advisory against the class 2 EEE parts a programme has already selected, under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.5.3: match each declared-list entry on part number, manufacturer and date-code window together, derive the action the severity and the procurement stage jointly earn rather than the stage alone, score every match so a queue is worked in the order the hardware needs, decide whether the part approval itself reopens, fan the advisory out to the other...

Determine which flow of the dedicated ASIC development standard a class 2 application specific integrated circuit enters under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.2, and what that referral costs: compare the candidate build against the referenced one axis by axis, group the movements into silicon, design and assembly, build the activity plan the device category carries, split it into work the heritage still covers and work the movements reopen, and check the reuse evidence and the currency of the qualif...

Determine whether a final acceptance session held at the manufacturer releases a Class 2 EEE lot under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.6: settle first which shape the session took, on-site, remote, delegated or a package review standing in for a session, hold each shape to its own notice period and its own admissibility condition, test any delegate for independence from the line that built the parts, and cap the release at the pieces actually presented. Use when a session at the supplier has to beco...

Prepare and grade the compliance matrix a reliability Class 2 component control plan is assessed through under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.1.2.2: refuse a row with no identifier, clause reference or status, reject a clause outside the applicable set and a second row against one already answered, read a deviation with no justification or no approved disposition as open, treat an unjustified non-applicability as an unanswered clause, and return the weighted clause row coverage beside the compliance ...

Compute whether every Class 2 part in an equipment design works inside its stress reduction margin at the temperature it actually runs at, under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.2.5: cut each maker rating back by the retention its category leaves above the knee, apply the category margin to what survives, build every applied stress from its nominal value, tolerance spread, end-of-life drift and transient uplift, grade each one, then name the tightest part and the ambient rise the equipment still abso...

Maintain an unbroken identity trail for class 2 EEE parts from goods receipt through storage and kitting into finished assemblies, under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.5.4: read the depth each receipt record actually supports, from part number through date code and lot to a serialised one, compare it with the depth the application criticality demands, reconcile received quantity against issued, scrapped and remaining, reject an assembly that consumed a lot never issued to it, flag a bin that mixed tw...

Verify that a removable contact may be fitted into a class 2 connector under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.6: fold the offered maker name onto the key the approved source list is matched on, resolve a recorded alias, name the lot code, date code, conformance certificate and detail specification the delivery is missing, demand pair evidence when contact and shell come from different sources, test the conductor cross-section against the crimp range of the size and the applied current against the cla...

Evaluate a constructional analysis carried out on Class 2 evaluation samples under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.3.3: size the destructive sample set from the part family and the declared procurement lots, confirm the sectioned samples actually reach every declared lot and date code, keep an unexecuted mandatory step apart from the conformance index instead of folding it in, weigh each anomaly by the internal barrier it sits on and how far it spreads through the set, and treat construction differi...

Verify that an editable declared components list has been issued for every reliability Class 2 equipment item under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.1.4: refuse an issue with no equipment reference, label, file form or lines, read a flattened print, a scan or a locked file as an uneditable issue whatever it contains, grade each line on the fields a procurement decision needs, separate a list behind the build from one ahead of it, age every board decision that never reached the list, and weight the cove...

Evaluate the teardown a delivered Class 2 EEE lot owes under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.9: partition the shipment into date-code groups, size the sample each group owes against the spare units left after the build demand, credit a group whose previous teardown still sits inside its validity window down to a confirmation sample, categorize construction observations against a project register, judge die-attach voiding as a fraction of die area and every bond pull as a margin on the diameter minim...

Evaluate how parts fitted to an engineering qualification model are handled under the Class 2 rules of clause 5.1.6 of ECSS-Q-ST-60C: settle interchangeability first, measure how many quality-ladder rungs each fitted part sits below the flight-intended one, refuse a depth past the Class 2 allowance and one left unjustified, accumulate thermal cycles, rework operations and powered hours against their declared limits, keep the governing stress, then rule on the carry-over Class 2 permits, which...

Determine whether a part proposed for Class 2 use still owes an evaluation under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.3.1, when no prior qualification stands behind it: read the assurance class each prior record was earned at and carry it down but never up, hold every record to the same manufacturing line, the same part variant, no notified process change, its validity window and a mission profile at least as demanding, take the strongest admissible record rather than the sum of the weak ones, withhold a...

Derive the inspection and test programme a Class 2 part evaluation actually owes under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.3.4: start from the core every evaluated part owes whatever it is, add each item a declared condition asks for — mission length, mission dose, a particle environment on an active technology, a sealed or moisture-absorbing package, a termination finish with a known failure mode, an operating span nobody characterised, a mechanical environment nobody covered higher up — keep the trigg...

Determine which electronic parts inside ground support equipment sit within the Class 2 control boundary under clause 5.1.5 of ECSS-Q-ST-60C: walk each part's downstream chain to the flight connector, refuse a looping bench, break the chain only at a qualified isolation stage, grade what survives as direct or indirect, credit a verified protective element by exactly one obligation rung and never below the identity floor, then match obligations raised against evidence held and return the closu...

Assess the handling and storage chain a Class 2 EEE lot passed through under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.4: band the part by the discharge voltage it withstands, read the protection level and measures that band owes, grade every custody leg from receipt through bonded store, kitting and line issue against the protection its location actually held, accumulate the open-air minutes spent outside dry storage against the lot's budget, report store temperature and humidity as margins to their nearest li...

Assess the additional provisions a class 2 EEE part owes when it is applied at high voltage or in a high power microwave chain under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.7: stop a part whose working voltage sits above its own rating, take the voltage utilisation against the class 2 limit, resolve the gas breakdown voltage across the electrode gap at the ambient pressure and the margin it leaves, derive the clearance and creepage the surface condition calls for, and group the frequency-gap product against...

Validate that a class 2 hybrid microcircuit is being bought against the specifications ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.3 lists for it: read the generic family and the weakest admissible tier from the construction, check the order line cites that family at an issue that has not been superseded and at or above that tier, test the supplier against the qualification register and the month its window closes, grade every die, passive, substrate and interconnect against the tier its kind demands, and take ...

Assess whether a Class 2 EEE delivery enters the bonded store on arrival at the procuring entity under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.7: reconcile the pieces counted against the note and take transit damage out of the accepted quantity first, size the draw and its acceptance numbers from the lot that remains, group the defects found by severity so a cosmetic mark and a cracked body are not one tally, and read a breached static-protective bag as evidence about every piece it held. Use when a goods-i...

Assess whether a class 2 parts programme recorded its inspection and control outcomes reconcilably under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.7: name every performed activity carrying no record, refuse a recording authority outside the accepted list, reject a record whose inspected count fails to reconcile with its accepted, rejected and deferred counts, require a nonconformance reference behind every rejected quantity, take coverage as the share of activities holding a defect-free record against a floor u...

Plan which Class 2 EEE lots of a delivery still owe a lot acceptance submission under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.5: split the delivery into one submission unit per part number, date code and manufacturer lot, settle each acceptance test group of a unit separately, credit evidence that names the lot for the endpoint and environmental groups while letting same-family evidence discharge the endurance group alone, and size every outstanding draw per group with exact rational arithmetic. Use when a ...

Verify that the specimens offered for class 2 radiation verification testing stand for the flight hardware under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.5.5, where the set is composed in line with the radiation standard: read the traceability axes the declared basis rests on, measure every specimen against the flight lot on exactly those axes, size the irradiated, control and spare roles in integer arithmetic from the test method and the number of bias conditions, and hold the scope the result will be written...

Verify the manufacturer data package delivered with a Class 2 EEE shipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.11: derive the record set the part category and the lot's screening, radiation, deviation and rework history owe, grade every delivered certificate for an authorised signature, a lot code agreeing with the box, an issue day at or before dispatch and a quantity covering what arrived, weight the graded records into a completeness fraction, and name the mandatory gaps that hold a shipment wh...

Evaluate a microwave monolithic integrated circuit offered for class 2 equipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.5: take the semiconductor technology, the source route and the delivery form, measure the guard band at each edge of the sweep the part was characterized over, resolve the junction temperature across the die and interface thermal path against the class 2 derating limit, take the drive utilisation and the output backoff below compression, group the electrostatic withstand, then assem...

Manage the nonconformance and failure control system a programme runs over its class 2 EEE parts under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.5.2: escalate a part sitting in a safety-critical or single-point-failure function, grade each report minor, major or critical from effect, reach and safety consequence, derive the dispositions the grade allows and the signatures each earns, decide when a failure analysis is owed, impound siblings by shared date code for a lot-related mode and across every date code fo...

Evaluate a candidate Class 2 part's case style and material content against the ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.2.2 limits: decide whether the package is hermetic, and for a non-hermetic one grade its moisture sensitivity level against the build ceiling and its demonstrated damp life against the humid hours the mission asks for with margin; grade every surface finish against the lead mass fraction that keeps a tin coating off the whisker route; grade each declared metal against the trace it is allow...

Assess whether every part proposed for Class 2 flight use carries the justification, documents and gate clearance of ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.4: hold each submission to the justification record and to the separate approval document set, read the gate that governs the part from how it is procured and treat an approval granted after it as late however complete it is, refuse an approval outside its validity window, release nothing on a conditional approval until every condition carries a closure...

Evaluate whether the approval route an electronic part actually took is the route that part needed at reliability Class 2 under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.1.3: refuse a submission with no part reference, category, outcome or dates, route each category to its lowest permitted decision level, refuse a level below it, test the seated quorum and the chair behind the level taken, require the evaluation evidence, customer agreement and minute the level rests on, and flag every part committed before its...

Determine which organizational unit is accountable for electronic part control activities on a reliability Class 2 programme under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.1.2.1: refuse a unit with no name or recorded appointment, take each mandated control activity in turn, read an activity named to two units as contested rather than covered twice, weight the covered activities by criticality, name every unassigned, contested and unappointed one, require an escalation route where the unit reports inside the d...

Audit the witnessed pre-cap source inspection covering the Class 2 production lots of an order. Use when a lot is about to be sealed or its inspection record is reviewed: decide from the package whether a witness point exists at all, place that point ahead of the seal in the manufacturing flow, report a cavity-affecting operation running between the two, accept a delegated inspection agency only on a customer delegation reference, admit an unwitnessed lot only against an accepted in-line moni...

Assess which Class 2 source costs the project the least added work under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.2.3: scope the qualification and screening steps a candidate's package style can physically be run through, subtract the evidence the source already holds, price what is left in effort units, campaign weeks and sample devices consumed, rank every candidate by the burden it leaves, then set the chosen part against the cheapest one and grade any step away against the reasons the project accepts. Us...

Evaluate whether the Class 2 EEE parts actually purchased meet the technical baseline agreed for the project. Use when an order is placed or its procurement file is reviewed: match every ordered part type to a baseline entry in both directions, compare the offered procurement grade against the grade the baseline demands, confirm the part temperature range contains the mission range with the margin required at each end, admit a broker route only against traceability and counterfeit-avoidance e...

Validate the controlled written purchasing specification that each Class 2 EEE part type is bought against. Use when an order is raised or its document control is reviewed: index the library so one controlled document owns one part type, score the mandatory content the specification owes, reject a line raised against a draft, superseded or withdrawn issue or against one released after the order date, compare the revision the order cites with the revision actually released on a family-aware or...

Plan the development, reuse and in-service maintenance of a programmable logic device flown in class 2 equipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.4: take the archive the declared design baseline has to hold and name what is missing, decide whether the toolchain behind that archive can still be stood up, route the design to a full development, a delta verification or a reviewed reuse, attach the duties the configuration technology carries once the unit has shipped, and count how often each one c...

Determine the receiving control plan a class 2 EEE lot owes once it is booked in under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.5.1: stop a lot with no identity, quantity, date code or conformity certificate at the door, derive the baseline activities the package style, temperature duty, radiation duty, source and age call for, add the upscreening delta when the delivered flow sits below the flow the application demands, credit back only what current manufacturer evidence carries, order non-destructive work ah...

Determine whether a Class 2 part's radiation tolerance covers the environment it sees across the whole declared mission under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.2.2.4: accumulate ionising dose and displacement fluence phase by phase behind the design shielding, set the design margin from how the capability was evidenced, grade both accumulated mechanisms, refuse a destructive single event threshold at or below the environment with no rate credit, then report the mission months the part supports, the phas...

Verify that a radiation-sensitive Class 2 EEE part meets the environment its mission declared under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.8: credit each heritage irradiation record through the knockdown its similarity tier earns, take the best credited capability as a radiation design margin computed in exact rational arithmetic, and settle the part on heritage, on its own flight-lot irradiation, or against a destructive single event whose onset sits below the mission requirement. Use when existing radiat...

Assess the screening regime applied to Class 2 EEE parts before they enter flight standard hardware. Use when a lot is screened or its screening record is reviewed: decide from the destination whether flight screening is owed or non-flight marking is, take the screen set the package family carries, name any screen omitted, confirm each stress precedes the measurement that judges it, convert a burn-in run off its reference temperature into equivalent hours through an Arrhenius factor, and comp...

Assess whether a candidate Class 2 EEE part is ready to be taken to a procurement decision under clause 5.2.1 of ECSS-Q-ST-60C: declare every selection prerequisite as satisfied, open, tailored or not applicable, refuse tailoring on a blocking prerequisite and any tailoring without a rationale and an approval reference, weight what is still in force, credit a tailored item partially rather than fully, compute the readiness index, name the blocking items still open, and return the prerequisite...

Audit the baseline Class 2 selection rules and how far they reach down the supply chain under clause 5.2.2.1 of ECSS-Q-ST-60C: declare each rule at each tier as applied, met by an accepted equivalent supplier rule, waived against a named approval, or not applied, refuse a chain with a gap in it, downgrade any equivalence or waiver whose evidence is missing, separate a rule never in force in-house from one lost downstream, compute coverage tier by tier, take the weakest tier as the chain's rea...

Validate an in-house wound magnetic part built for class 2 equipment under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.6.8: refuse a part with no wire specification, no core specification and no qualified winding procedure behind it, resolve the peak flux density from the volt-second product and its utilisation of core saturation, take the window fill factor and the winding current density, carry the copper and core losses across the thermal path to a hot spot margin below the derated insulation rating, and deriv...

Determine whether expired Class 2 EEE stock can have its storage validity restored under ECSS-Q-ST-60C clause 5.3.10: scale the package family baseline period by the store the parts actually sat in, test the elapsed storage against the period that grants, check the relifing round ceiling before any test is sized, assemble the test set the package, lead finish and part function owe, judge every result against its accept number, and re-grant a decaying shortened period floored so a re-grant too...