All authors

Claude Skills by LerianStudio
github.com/LerianStudio77 skills0 installs67 views
- Mapping Service ResourcesMapping a Go service's Service -> Module -> Resource hierarchy for dispatch-layer registration: detects modules and per-module PostgreSQL/MongoDB/RabbitMQ resources, database names, and shared databases, generates MongoDB index migration pairs (.up.json/.down.json), detects existing Postgres migrations, emits an HTML report, and offers opt-in S3 upload. Use before ring:adding-multi-tenancy on a new service. Skip for non-Go projects.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Migrating To Lib ObservabilityMigrating a Lerian Go app off lib-commons observability imports (deprecated shims or removed APIs) to lib-observability via a fixed mapping table, then bumps go.mod and validates the build; ring:backend-go applies the edits. Covers log/zap/runtime/assert, opentelemetry/tracing, HTTP middleware, context helpers, and direct systemplane import moves. Use when lib-commons observability imports remain or the build breaks on removed APIs.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Migrating To Lib SystemplaneMigrating Lerian Go services from .env/YAML operational knobs (log levels, feature flags, rate limits, timeouts) to the lib-systemplane hot-reloadable runtime config client, wiring the migration-only make systemplane-ddl pipeline (runtime DDL forbidden in v1.6.0+). Orchestrates an 11-gate cycle dispatching ring:backend-go. Use when adding hot-reloadable config or migrating off v4 systemplane. Skip for non-Go or static-only config.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Planning Backend RefactorPlanning a backend refactor: audits an existing Go or TypeScript backend against Ring/Lerian standards and produces a prioritized task list (findings.md + tasks.md) ready for ring:running-dev-cycle. Plans only — no edits. Use when an existing backend service needs to meet standards or an audit is requested. Skip for greenfield projects, single-file fixes, or frontend (use ring:planning-frontend-refactor).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Planning Codebase SimplificationPlanning a whole-codebase simplification: audits a Go/TS codebase for needless abstraction and emits a KILL/REVIEW/KEEP plan plus a ring:running-dev-cycle task array. Plans only — no edits. Detects single-impl interfaces, pass-through shims, translation-free adapters, and dead-code cascade chains under an inverted burden of proof. Use for pre-public or post-pivot cleanup. Skip for current diff review (use ring:reviewing-code).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Planning Frontend RefactorPlanning a frontend refactor: audits an existing React/Next.js frontend against Ring standards (architecture, design system, accessibility, testing) and produces a prioritized task list (findings.md + tasks.md) for ring:running-dev-cycle-frontend. Plans only — no edits. Use when an existing frontend needs to meet standards or an audit is requested. Skip for greenfield, single-file fixes, or backend (use ring:planning-backend-refactor).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Reviewing Operational RiskReviewing a Go/TS service's operational risk by mapping integration failure points (external HTTP calls, queue consumers, outbound webhooks), simulating stuck intermediate states for each entity in a flow, and classifying each scenario into tiers — then emitting operational runbooks (Tier 2) or gap specs (Tier 3). Two entry modes: explore an existing codebase, or read a dev-cycle plan.md and epic artifacts. Use before production hardening, incident retros, or at dev-cycle end. Skip for protot...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Running Dev Cycle FrontendRunning the frontend (React/Next.js/TS) dev cycle from a plan.md (ring:writing-plans format; legacy tasks.md only for in-flight cycles) or backend handoff: drives frontend agents through Gate 0 TDD plus accessibility/visual/E2E/perf checks, Gate 7 parallel review, and Gate 8 user validation, with rolling-wave phase boundaries. Use when starting or resuming a gated frontend dev cycle. Skip for backend (use ring:running-dev-cycle) or docs-only work.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Running Dev CycleRunning the backend dev cycle: implements every task in a rolling-wave plan.md (ring:writing-plans format) for a Go/TS service, driving specialist agents through Gate 0 implementation/TDD, Gate 8 parallel review, and Gate 9 validation per epic, elaborating later phases at each phase boundary. Use when starting or resuming a gated backend dev cycle with a plan.md (legacy tasks.md only for cycles already in flight; new cycles need the canonical plan format). Skip for frontend (use ring:running-...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Validating Acceptance CriteriaValidating a completed task against its acceptance criteria, mapping each AC to evidence, and gating completion on explicit user sign-off (self-approval prohibited). Gate 5 of ring:running-dev-cycle / ring:running-dev-cycle-frontend, run at task cadence after ring:reviewing-code. Use when implementation and tests are done and you need approval to close the task. Skip outside a dev-cycle, or for doc-only or non-code tasks.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Verifying CodeVerifying a Go project: runs every quality check (lint, vet, imports, format, docs, unit, integration, E2E) and returns a single MERGE_READY or NEEDS_FIX verdict. Report-only: never fixes anything. Use for a quick pre-merge or pre-PR check outside a full dev-cycle. Skip when not a Go project, when you want a single command, or when already inside ring:running-dev-cycle (use its gates).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Writing Dev ReportsWriting a structured markdown dev report for a completed development epic: reads accumulated epic metrics (TDD, coverage, delivery, lint, file-size, license), computes a quality score with tiers, and records root-cause and next-cycle improvements. Use after an epic completes in ring:running-dev-cycle or when asked for a development feedback report. Skip for documentation-only epics or outside a dev cycle.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Designing Api ContractsDesigning the API contract as a real OpenAPI 3.1 specification (openapi.yaml with full paths, operations, schemas, components, Lerian error envelope, and auth schemes) from the validated TRD. Gate 4 of ring:planning-large-features, Large Track only; runs after ring:writing-trds, before ring:designing-data-model. Use when a system exposes APIs that components or clients consume. Skip for Small Track, a system with no API surface, or an unvalidated TRD.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Designing Data ModelDesigning the physical data model as a real stack-native schema (schema.sql with CREATE TABLE DDL, indexes, and constraints for Postgres/Go; schema.prisma for Prisma/TS; Postgres schema.sql as fallback) from the Gate 4 OpenAPI spec and TRD. Gate 5 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after ring:designing-api-contracts, before ring:pinning-dependency-versions. Use when the system stores persistent data. Skip for Small Track, no persistent data, or an unvalidated API contract.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Mapping Feature RelationshipsMapping how features relate and phasing the work: categorizing PRD features, grouping them into domains, charting cross-feature journeys, dependencies, and integration points, and defining the binding Phases that plan.md mirrors one-to-one at Gate 7. Gate 2 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after ring:writing-prds, before ring:writing-trds. Use for Large Track features with multiple interacting parts. Skip for Small Track or a single simple feature.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Mapping Streaming EventsMapping the eventable points in a Lerian Go service where lib-streaming should emit past-tense, durable, tenant-scoped business events, producing a PM-validated event catalog and instrumentation-map.json for ring:instrumenting-streaming-events. Three-pass discovery (Survey, Slice, Mark) with a scope fence and delivery postures. Use to inventory eventable points. Skip on non-Go, infra-only, or consumer-only services.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Pinning Dependency VersionsPinning an explicit versioned dependency manifest (dependencies.md plus PROJECT_RULES.md): exact package versions, CVE and license checks, compatibility matrices, and per-component cost analysis against Ring Standards. Gate 6 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after ring:designing-data-model, before ring:writing-plans. Use when the schema is validated and you are about to lock products and versions. Skip for Small Track or when versions are already locked.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Planning Large FeaturesPlanning the 8-gate Large Track pre-dev workflow (research, PRD, feature map, TRD, API contract, data model, dependency map, plan) with per-gate human approval. Use for features 2+ days that add dependencies, data models, multi-service integration, or new architecture. Skip for small features (use ring:planning-small-features). Plans only — no edits.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Planning Small FeaturesPlanning the lightweight 4-gate Small Track pre-dev workflow (research, PRD, TRD, plan) with human approval and state tracking at each gate. Use for features under 2 days that reuse existing patterns and add no new dependencies, data models, or services. Skip for larger or complex features — use ring:planning-large-features instead. Plans only — no edits.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Reconciling Predev DocsReconciling pre-dev artifacts (research.md, prd.md, feature-map.md, trd.md, openapi.yaml, schema file, dependencies.md, plan.md) against each other to surface contradictions and gaps that break implementation, then applying approved corrections before ring:running-dev-cycle. Use after ring:planning-small-features or ring:planning-large-features. Skip for end-user docs (use ring:reviewing-docs), code review (use ring:reviewing-code), or before the docs exist.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Researching FeaturesResearching the product/feature in depth before any planning document is written: the product itself, technical approach, third-party integrations, prior art, and existing codebase grounding (file:line refs) via parallel repo/web/docs agents using firecrawl and exa. Gate 0 of ring:using-pm-team (both tracks); runs before ring:writing-prds. Use before pre-dev planning a new feature or modification. Skip for trivial changes or when a recent research.md already exists.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Validating Ux CompletenessValidating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer pass and before the TRD when the feature has UI; the pre-dev orchestrators recommend it when the feature has UI. Use to check UI design completeness. Skip for backend-only, API-only...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Writing PrdsWriting a Product Requirements Document that explains to the squad WHAT is being built and WHY: problem, explicit scope in/out, functional requirements, and testable acceptance criteria. Gate 1 of ring:using-pm-team; runs after ring:researching-features and stays technology-free (no architecture, frameworks, or schemas). Use when starting a new feature or asked to plan or produce requirements. Skip when a validated PRD exists, for pure technical changes, or bug fixes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Writing TrdsWriting a Technical Requirements Document that designs the technical architecture of the system or feature: components and boundaries, data flow, integration points, failure modes, and the mandatory program structure (DDD/hexagonal source tree) — in technology-agnostic patterns (code structure excepted), plus auth/pagination and BFF contracts for fullstack. Gate 3 of ring:planning-large-features (after ring:mapping-feature-relationships, before ring:designing-api-contracts) and Gate 2 of ring...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Applying Voice And ToneApplying the technical-writing voice and tone style guide: second person, present tense, active voice, short sentences, sentence-case headings, product/entity capitalization, contractions, and sparing emphasis. Use when checking voice/tone compliance, writing new docs, or reviewing docs for style. Skip when checking structure only (use ring:structuring-documentation) or technical accuracy only (use the docs-reviewer agent).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Reviewing DocsReviewing end-user and product documentation quality across voice/tone, structure, completeness, clarity, and technical accuracy; flags issues with prioritized findings and a pass/needs-revision verdict. Use when reviewing draft docs, running a pre-publication check, auditing existing docs, or enforcing style-guide compliance. Skip when writing new docs, or checking voice only (use ring:applying-voice-and-tone).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215
- Structuring DocumentationStructuring documentation: content hierarchy, overview/conceptual/task page structures, section dividers, navigation, tables-vs-lists, code placement, cross-linking, and page-length targets. Use when planning doc structure, organizing a content hierarchy, splitting content across pages, or designing navigation. Skip when writing the actual content, or checking voice (use ring:applying-voice-and-tone).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 215