Planning a backend refactor: audits an existing Go or TypeScript backend against Ring/Lerian standards and produces a prioritized task list (findings.md + tasks.md) ready for ring:running-dev-cycle. Plans only — no edits. Use when an existing backend service needs to meet standards or an audit is requested. Skip for greenfield projects, single-file fixes, or frontend (use ring:planning-frontend-refactor).
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill planning-backend-refactor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Planning Backend Refactor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lerianstudio-planning-backend-refactor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ring:planning-backend-refactor
description: "Planning a backend refactor: audits an existing Go or TypeScript backend against Ring/Lerian standards and produces a prioritized task list (findings.md + tasks.md) ready for ring:running-dev-cycle. Plans only — no edits. Use when an existing backend service needs to meet standards or an audit is requested. Skip for greenfield projects, single-file fixes, or frontend (use ring:planning-frontend-refactor)."
---
# Dev Refactor Skill
## When to use
- User wants to refactor existing project to follow standards
- Legacy codebase needs modernization
- Project audit requested
## Skip when
- Greenfield project → Use ring:planning-large-features or ring:planning-small-features instead
- Single file fix → Use ring:running-dev-cycle directly
- Frontend project → Use ring:planning-frontend-refactor
Analyzes existing backend codebase against Ring/Lerian standards and generates refactoring tasks for ring:running-dev-cycle.
You orchestrate. Agents analyze. NEVER run Bash/Grep/Read to analyze code directly — dispatch agents.
## Gap Principle
Every divergence from Ring standards = a mandatory gap to implement. No exceptions.
All divergences → FINDING-XXX → REFACTOR-XXX task → ring:running-dev-cycle input.
## Architecture Pattern Applicability
| Service Type | Apply Hexagonal/Lerian Pattern? |
|---|---|
| CRUD API | ✅ YES |
| Complex business logic | ✅ YES |
| Event-driven systems | ✅ YES |
| CLI tools / scripts | ❌ NO |
| Workers / background jobs | ❌ NO |
| Simple lambdas | ❌ NO |
## Execution Steps
### Step 1: Validate Prerequisites
- Check `docs/PROJECT_RULES.md` exists → STOP if missing
- Detect stack: `go.mod` → Go; `package.json` + Express/Fastify/NestJS (no React) → TypeScript
- If `package.json` + React/Next.js → STOP: use `ring:planning-frontend-refactor`
### Step 2: Generate Codebase Report
Dispatch `ring:codebase-explorer`:
```
Generate comprehensive codebase report: project structure, architecture pattern,
tech stack, code patterns (config, database, handlers, errors, telemetry, testing),
key files inventory with file:line references, code snippets.
Output: docs/ring:planning-backend-refactor/{timestamp}/codebase-report.md
```
### Step 3: Dispatch Specialist Agents (parallel)
Verify `codebase-report.md` exists before dispatching.
**For Go projects — dispatch backend analysis:**
```yaml
Task 1: ring:backend-go (MODE: ANALYSIS only)
- Load golang.md via WebFetch
- Check all sections per shared-patterns/standards-coverage-table.md
- Flag framework/library mismatches vs standards
- File size enforcement: >1000 lines = ISSUE-XXX (HIGH), >1500 = CRITICAL
- Multi-tenant analysis per shared-patterns/multi-tenant-analysis.md
- Check tests, coverage, docker-compose/local runtime, and observability as backend-owned responsibilities
- Output: Standards Coverage Table + ISSUE-XXX per finding
```
**For TypeScript projects:**
Use `ring:backend-ts` with the same analysis contract.
### Step 4: Map Findings → Tasks
After all agents complete:
1. Save individual agent reports to `docs/ring:planning-backend-refactor/{timestamp}/`
2. Map each ISSUE-XXX → FINDING-XXX (normalize severity, add file:line, current vs expected)
3. Generate `docs/ring:planning-backend-refactor/{timestamp}/findings.md`
4. Map each FINDING-XXX → one REFACTOR-XXX task (1:1 mapping)
5. Generate `docs/ring:planning-backend-refactor/{timestamp}/tasks.md` (ring:running-dev-cycle compatible)
**Findings template:**
```markdown
# {project-name} Refactor Findings
## FINDING-001: {Pattern Name} in {file_path}
- **Severity:** CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
- **File:** {path}:{line}
- **Current:** {code or description}
- **Expected:** {Ring standard}
- **Standard Reference:** {standards doc section}
```
**Tasks template:**
```markdown
# {project-name} Refactor Tasks
## REFACTOR-001: {Pattern Name} in {file_path}
- **Finding:** FINDING-001
- **Estimated Complexity:** trivial | moderate | complex
- **Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] {specific, testable criteria}
```
### Step 5: Visual Change Report + User Approval
Generate visual HTML summary of KILL/CHANGE/ADD operations → dispatch `ring:visualizing`.
Present to user for approval. Wait for explicit APPROVED.
### Step 6: Save + Handoff
Save all artifacts to `docs/ring:planning-backend-refactor/{timestamp}/`.
Handoff to `ring:running-dev-cycle`: feed tasks.md as input.
## Agent Analysis Report Template
```markdown
# {Agent Name} Analysis Report
## EXPLORATION SUMMARY
High-level architecture assessment
## KEY FINDINGS
ISSUE-XXX list with file:line, current, expected
## ARCHITECTURE INSIGHTS
Patterns detected, notable deviations
## RELEVANT FILES
Files most impacted by findings
## RECOMMENDATIONS
Priority order for refactoring
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!