Pinning an explicit versioned dependency manifest (dependencies.md plus PROJECT_RULES.md): exact package versions, CVE and license checks, compatibility matrices, and per-component cost analysis against Ring Standards. Gate 6 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after ring:designing-data-model, before ring:writing-plans. Use when the schema is validated and you are about to lock products and versions. Skip for Small Track or when versions are already locked.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill pinning-dependency-versions --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pinning Dependency Versions?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lerianstudio-pinning-dependency-versions)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ring:pinning-dependency-versions
description: "Pinning an explicit versioned dependency manifest (dependencies.md plus PROJECT_RULES.md): exact package versions, CVE and license checks, compatibility matrices, and per-component cost analysis against Ring Standards. Gate 6 of ring:planning-large-features; runs after ring:designing-data-model, before ring:writing-plans. Use when the schema is validated and you are about to lock products and versions. Skip for Small Track or when versions are already locked."
---
# Dependency Map — Explicit Technology Choices
## When to use
- Schema (schema.sql / schema.prisma) passed Gate 5 validation
- About to select specific technologies
- Large Track workflow (2+ day features)
## Skip when
- Small Track workflow → skip to ring:writing-plans
- Technologies already locked → skip to ring:writing-plans
- Schema not validated → complete Gate 5 first
## Sequence
**Runs before:** ring:writing-plans
**Runs after:** ring:designing-data-model
Every technology choice must be explicit, versioned, validated against Ring Standards, and justified. The Dependency Map answers WHAT specific products, versions, packages, and infrastructure will be used.
## Step 0: Standards Loading (HARD GATE)
### Step 0.1: Read Technology Decisions from TRD
Read `docs/pre-dev/{feature}/trd.md` — extract: `deployment.model`, `tech_stack.primary`, `project_technologies[]`.
If TRD metadata missing → STOP: "Go back to TRD (Gate 3) and complete Step 0.4."
### Step 0.2: Load Ring Standards via WebFetch
| Standard | URL |
|----------|-----|
| golang/index.md | `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/golang/index.md` |
| typescript.md | `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/typescript.md` |
| frontend.md | `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/frontend.md` |
| devops.md | `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/devops.md` |
| sre.md | `https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/sre.md` |
### Step 0.3: Generate PROJECT_RULES.md (OUTPUT)
Using TRD `project_technologies[]`, create `docs/PROJECT_RULES.md` with: deployment model, tech stack, per-category decisions (PRD requirement, technology, version, rationale, cloud service, on-premise alternative), version matrix, security/compliance notes.
## Mandatory Workflow
| Phase | Activities |
|-------|------------|
| **1. Evaluation** | Ring Standards loaded; map TRD components to tech candidates; validate against Ring Standards; map the schema file (schema.sql / schema.prisma) to storage; map openapi.yaml contracts to protocols; check team expertise; estimate costs |
| **2. Selection** | Per technology: check Ring Standards (mandatory/prohibited), specify exact version, list alternatives with trade-offs, verify compatibility, check security (CVEs), validate licenses, calculate costs |
| **3. Gate 6 Validation** | All dependencies explicit; no conflicts; no critical CVEs; licenses compliant; costs documented; all components mapped |
## Version Rules
1. **Explicit**: `@v1.27.0` not `@latest` or `^1.0.0`
2. **Justified ranges**: If using `>=`, document why
3. **Lock file referenced**: `go.mod`, `package-lock.json`, etc.
4. **Upgrade constraints**: Document why locked/capped
5. **Compatibility**: Document known conflicts
## Include in Dependency Map
- Exact package names with versions (`go.uber.org/zap@v1.27.0`)
- Tech stack with constraints (`Go 1.24+, PostgreSQL 16`)
- Infrastructure specs (`Valkey 8, MinIO`)
- External SDKs, dev tools, security deps, monitoring tools
- Compatibility matrices
- License summary
- Cost analysis
## Never Include
- Implementation code or how to use dependencies
- Task breakdowns or setup instructions
- Architectural patterns (→ TRD)
- Business requirements (→ PRD)
## Output Format
**File:** `docs/PROJECT_RULES.md`
**File:** `docs/pre-dev/{feature}/dependencies.md`
```markdown
# Dependency Map: {Feature Name}
## Technology Decisions
| Category | PRD Requirement | Choice | Version | Rationale | Alternatives Considered |
|----------|----------------|--------|---------|-----------|------------------------|
| Relational DB | Persistent user data | PostgreSQL | 16.2 | Ring standard; team expertise; ACID | MySQL (less preferred), SQLite (no concurrent writes) |
| Cache | Session storage | Valkey | 8.0 | Ring standard; Redis-compatible | Redis (licensing change) |
| Message Queue | Async processing | RabbitMQ | 3.13 | Ring standard; existing infra | Kafka (overkill for volume) |
## Version Matrix
| Package | Version | Lock File | Upgrade Constraint |
|---------|---------|-----------|-------------------|
| go.uber.org/zap | v1.27.0 | go.sum | Stable API; no breaking changes in minor |
## Security & Licenses
| Package | License | CVE Status | Risk |
|---------|---------|-----------|------|
| github.com/jackc/pgx/v5 | MIT | None | Low |
## Cost Analysis
| Component | Shared/Dedicated | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|-----------|-----------------|-------------|-------|
| PostgreSQL (RDS) | Dedicated | R$ 1,490 | 2 vCPU, 8GB RAM |
```
## Gate 6 Validation Checklist
| Category | Requirements |
|----------|--------------|
| **Completeness** | All TRD components have specific technology choices; all dependencies explicit |
| **Versioning** | Exact versions specified; no `@latest`; lock files referenced |
| **Standards Compliance** | Choices validated against Ring Standards; prohibited packages avoided |
| **Security** | No critical CVEs; licenses compliant; security deps included |
| **Costs** | Cost per component documented; shared vs dedicated decisions made |
**Gate Result:** ✅ PASS → Plan (ring:writing-plans) | ⚠️ CONDITIONAL (version gaps or cost estimates missing) | ❌ FAIL (unresolved conflicts or CVEs)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!