Claude Skills by BZDmathclub

Generate or review mathematical-modeling competition AI tool usage statements and the anonymous AI工具使用详情.pdf. Use when users provide real AI usage records, or when checking a paper, statement, details PDF, code, and AI records for completeness, anonymity, and consistency.

Generate a coherent, whole-paper mathematical modeling solution framework from a complete contest problem. Use after the user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks for modeling ideas, an overall solution plan, question-by-question analysis, candidate-model comparison, model-selection reasons, innovations, validation, or cross-question linkage. For every question, explain the task and mathematical essence, compare multiple feasible models in tables, recommend a route with explici...

Generate a compliant Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-restatement chapter from a complete problem statement, or review a user's restatement against the original problem. Covers research background, problem review, and research overview; does not perform the separate problem-analysis chapter.

Translate a complete mathematical modeling contest problem sentence by sentence into precise modeling language, preserve every substantive condition and definition, expose hidden constraints, draw a mandatory Mermaid cross-question flowchart, audit omissions, and deliver one easy-to-open Markdown report. Use whenever a user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks to interpret, translate, unpack, read closely, identify requirements, or avoid missing details before modeling.

Query 2021-2025 CUMCM school awards and 2026 forecasts, or assess a student's preparation distance from provincial and national awards using school history and prior modeling experience.

Review mathematical modeling competition papers from a complete contest problem and a team's paper. Independently construct a fresh problem-specific 100-point rubric, audit eligibility and formatting, score with a 90%-of-weight ceiling, and produce an HTML report. For CUMCM, also use division, region, school and advisor history to estimate separate provincial and national competition scores without changing the paper-quality score. Use for CUMCM and similar paper evaluation requests.

Review a user-provided Chinese mathematical-modeling abstract without requiring the problem statement or full paper, identify concrete writing defects, and prioritize revisions. Use when the user asks to check, diagnose, or improve a modeling-paper abstract; do not claim coverage or factual consistency that cannot be verified without the problem or paper.

Review a mathematical-modeling paper's model-assumption section against the complete problem statement. Diagnose whether each assumption is necessary, evidence-based, compatible with the task, appropriately simplified, and usable by the later model. Use for assumption review, not automatic full-paper review or unsupported assumption generation.

Query the bundled BZD mathematical-modeling dictionary for a user-selected model, explain its assumptions, inputs, outputs, limitations and validation, then judge whether it fits the current competition problem and data. Use when a user asks whether a proposed model is appropriate, requests model feasibility review, or wants dictionary-based alternatives for a modeling task.

Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.

Review a Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-analysis section against the original problem, checking task classification, data reasoning, cross-problem linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. Use for diagnosis, not automatic full rewriting.

Check a mathematical-modeling paper's in-text citations, bibliography, appendix length and content, code, supporting files, reproducibility, consistency, and anonymity. Use when the user provides a paper or related materials and wants one consolidated P0-P3 audit; do not generate or invent missing sources or programs.

Review the symbol-notation section of a mathematical-modeling paper against the full paper. Check table coverage, symbol meanings, units, overloading, case and subscript consistency, first-use definitions, formula usage, and visible table formatting. Use for symbol-table diagnosis, not general paper review.

对数学建模竞赛论文进行两层AI痕迹审计——第一层9维检测(语言层面60%：连接词/排比/拔高词/被动句/段落规律/文本复杂度；事实层面40%：引文验证/数值一致性/术语一致性)，第二层模型合理性深度审查。严格判分+一票否决+问题标红。输出分层HTML报告。

Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; ...

Review mathematical modeling competition papers from a complete contest problem and a team's paper. Independently construct a problem-specific 100-point rubric, optionally import a prior bzd-paper-format-checker result, score every modeling/solution/result block by itemized 1-3 point deductions under a 90%-of-weight ceiling, map the -10-to-10 format score deterministically to a 0-to-1 quality coefficient, estimate contest percentile, and provide concise Chinese judge feedback. Use for CUMCM, ...