Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when building or revising the literature review for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), especially when the manuscript must connect domestic systems-engineering research, international theory and methods, recent articles in the journal, and a precise method-versus-application increment instead of presenting an author list.

Use when revising a manuscript and preparing a point-by-point response for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), especially for reviewer concerns about system boundaries, assumptions, propositions and proofs, algorithms, numerical experiments, simulation, empirical evidence, reproducibility, and requests that cannot be accepted without narrowing claims.

Use when stress-testing and packaging the reproducibility evidence for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), including parameter sensitivity, initial conditions, alternative models and metrics, extreme scenarios, Monte Carlo repetition, random seeds, software versions, data and code statements, and explicit failure boundaries.

Use when running the final submission preflight for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), including the official submission domain, account registration, initial screening, manuscript files, template, originality, verified fees, copyright, revised-file upload, contact verification, and fraud prevention without inventing anonymity or review-cycle rules.

Use when constructing or auditing the formal model for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), especially when system boundaries, levels, state and decision variables, parameters, constraints, objectives, information structure, heterogeneous actors, assumptions, notation, identifiability, or solvability must be made mutually consistent.

Use when designing or auditing propositions, theorems, corollaries, comparative statics, equilibria, stability results, proofs, counterexamples, boundary conditions, and applicability claims for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), so that formal results explain a system mechanism rather than treating the presence of formulas as a theoretical contribution.

Use when selecting or sharpening a research topic for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), especially when an idea mentions a system but has not yet fixed its boundary, interacting actors or components, states, feedback, constraints, method increment, testable question, and system-level outcome.

Use when choosing and designing evidence for a manuscript submitted to 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), with separate standards for numerical experiments, simulation, real data, case studies, out-of-sample prediction, optimization comparisons, and empirical research on financial or socioeconomic systems.

Use when a manuscript is being planned, drafted, revised, or prepared for submission to 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), especially when the author needs to identify the paper’s systems-engineering strand, diagnose the current lifecycle stage, and choose the next jse-tju skill without confusing this journal with Systems Engineering Theory and Practice or a purely mathematical management-science venue.

Use when drafting or formatting the title, bilingual abstracts and keywords, equations, symbols, figures, tables, references, funding and author information, appendix, proofs, and overall structure for 《系统工程学报》 (Journal of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University), while separating current official requirements from writing advice.

Use when the spatial identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript — boundary discontinuity, shift-share/Bartik, historical or geographic IV, place-based DiD, or mobility experiment. Stress-tests the spatial design against sorting, spillovers, and spatial-autocorrelation confounds before exhibits are finalized.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript relative to the urban-economics frontier is fuzzy or undersold. Stakes the marginal contribution against the right spatial literatures and the sibling journals; it does not design the identification or draft the prose.

Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) needs a response-letter strategy and a revision plan. Turns referee reports into a point-by-point response and routes the analytical work back through the pack; it does not run the new analysis itself.

Use when anticipating the objections a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) referee will raise before submission, so the manuscript pre-empts them. Maps the recurring JUE spatial pushbacks to where each is answered in the paper; it does not run the analysis or draft the response letter (jue-rebuttal).

Use when assembling the data and code deposit for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript under its mandatory replication policy — especially geocoded, restricted, or proprietary spatial data. Builds the JUE-compliant replication folder and confidentiality path; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript's headline spatial estimate must be shown to survive specification, spatial-scale, sorting, spillover, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the spatially-aware robustness suite a JUE referee expects; it does not establish the identification (jue-identification) or format the maps (jue-tables-figures).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript via Elsevier Editorial Manager — submission fee, single-anonymized review, format, the JUE: Insights short-paper track, and the cover-letter confidential-data exemption. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when the exhibits of a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript must make the spatial pattern visible — maps, event-study plots, RD/boundary figures, and clean regression tables. Designs the spatial exhibits a JUE referee expects; it does not run the analysis (jue-robustness) or write the prose (jue-writing-style).

Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript needs a spatial model to interpret its mechanism — a spatial-equilibrium frame, a sorting model, or a quantitative spatial model (QSM) for counterfactuals. Builds the theory that disciplines the empirics; it does not establish the identification (jue-identification) or run robustness (jue-robustness).

Use when deciding whether a question is a genuinely spatial, urban-economics contribution that fits the Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) rather than a sibling venue. Locks the spatial question and outlet fit before positioning; it does not write the literature review or design the identification.

Use when deciding which jue-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic through rebuttal for a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when the prose of a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) manuscript buries the spatial mechanism, or the intro/abstract do not land for an urban-economics audience. Sharpens the writing to JUE house voice; it does not run analysis or build exhibits. Late-stage — invoke after identification and the mechanism settle.

Use when stating the contribution of a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — discharging JAMS's dual mandate of a theoretical AND a managerial contribution and defending against "incremental." Frames the contribution; it does not run the analysis (jams-data-analysis) or polish the prose (jams-writing-style).

Use when running and reporting the analysis for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — selecting the estimator that matches the design (SEM/PLS, HLM, regression/econometrics, experiments, meta-analysis), reporting effect sizes and uncertainty, and translating estimates into managerial magnitudes. Executes and reports; jams-methods designs the study and jams-contribution-framing states the payoff.

Use when staking a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript's contribution against the marketing literature — locating it in the right stream, defending against "incremental / new-context," and citing the substantive canon the editor and reviewers expect. Positions the contribution; it does not state it in one sentence (jams-contribution-framing) or build the theory (jams-theory-development).

Use when matching the research design to the claim for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — construct validity and measurement, survey/SEM design, secondary-data identification, experiments, or meta-analysis. Designs the study and stress-tests validity; jams-data-analysis executes and reports the estimates.

Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jams-review-process).

Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — Springer Editorial Manager portal, double-anonymized blinding, APA style, the blinded title page, data/code availability, and declarations. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (jams-rebuttal).

Use when building exhibits for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — the conceptual model figure, measurement and structural tables, interaction/simple-slopes plots, and managerial summary exhibits in APA style. Makes each exhibit self-contained and decision-relevant; it does not write the surrounding prose (jams-writing-style).

Use when building the conceptual framework and mechanism for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — deriving hypotheses from marketing theory, specifying mediators and boundary conditions, and carrying the logic through to a managerial implication. Builds the argument; it does not select the question (jams-topic-selection) or run the analysis (jams-data-analysis).

Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — confirming it is a broad, managerially consequential marketing-science question and routing it away from sibling marketing journals. Frames the question; it does not build the theory (jams-theory-development) or run the analysis.

Use when deciding which jams-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from question to rebuttal for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when shaping the prose, abstract, and introduction of a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript so the dual theory-and-managerial contribution lands in the journal's voice. Polishes exposition; it does not state the contribution (jams-contribution-framing) or run the submission preflight (jams-submission).

Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — stating what the paper adds to IS knowledge, matching the contribution claim to the chosen category, and making it legible to a pluralistic, theory-forward reviewer pool. Frames and tests the contribution; it does not build the theory (jais-theory-development) or run the analysis (jais-data-analysis).

Use when running and reporting the empirical core of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — SEM measurement and structural models for behavioral IS, identification and robustness for economics-of-IS, artifact evaluation for design science, or trustworthiness for qualitative work — and assembling the data/matrix materials JAIS requires. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (jais-methods) or frame the contribution (jais-contribution-f...

Use when positioning a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript against the IS conversation — engaging the right cross-disciplinary literatures, citing the IS canon and JAIS's own discourse, and staking the gap the theory will fill. Builds the front-end argument; it does not build the theory itself (jais-theory-development) or run the review's method (jais-methods, for Literature Review submissions).

Use when choosing and defending the research design for a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — a behavioral survey/experiment, an economics-of-IS identification strategy, a design-science build-and-evaluate cycle, a qualitative/interpretive study, or a review method. Matches method to the IS claim under JAIS's methodological pluralism; it designs the study and hands estimation/evaluation to jais-data-analysis.

Use when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter, answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency, updating the required data materials, and keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity. Drafts the response after the manuscript is actually revised; interpret the decision first wi...

Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) editorial process — the developmental, Senior-Editor-led, double-blind review; how the seven-category routing works; what a JAIS decision letter means; and when to engage the journal's developmental culture. Sets expectations and reads decisions; it does not draft the response (jais-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (jais-submission).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — ManuscriptCentral portal, double-blind anonymization, the correct manuscript category and its length budget, the required SEM correlation/covariance matrix, the cover-letter elements (Senior Editor nomination, two suggested reviewers), and APA-6 formatting. Verifies readiness to submit; it does not polish prose (jais-writing-style) or interpret decisions (jais-review...

Use when building the exhibits of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — tables, figures, the required SEM correlation/covariance matrix, and theory diagrams — so the body remains a self-contained, APA-styled document. Makes exhibits answer the question; it does not write surrounding prose (jais-writing-style) or run the analysis (jais-data-analysis).

Use when building the theoretical engine of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — original theory for the Theory category, a behavioral mechanism, an economic mechanism, a design theory, or a pre-theoretical framing for a novel digital phenomenon. Adapts the form of "theory" to the category and tradition; it does not run the analysis (jais-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (jais-contribution-framing).

Use when deciding whether a question fits the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) and which of its seven manuscript categories to target. Locks the IS phenomenon, the unit of analysis, and the category before theory work begins; it does not build the theory (jais-theory-development) or invent citations.

Use when deciding which jais-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and it first helps you name which of JAIS's seven manuscript categories your paper belongs in.

Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) manuscript — the abstract, introduction, theory narrative, and APA-6 mechanics — so a pluralistic, theory-forward reviewer pool can follow the argument. A late-stage polish; it does not build the contribution (jais-contribution-framing) or check submission mechanics (jais-submission).

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript — credible causal identification in an empirical design, parameter identification in a structural/quantitative model, or the source of identification in a theory paper. Stress-tests the strategy to JEEA's general-interest bar before exhibits are finalized.

Use when the contribution of a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript relative to the frontier is fuzzy, oversold, or undersold. Stakes the marginal contribution for a general-interest readership; it does not fix identification, the model, or prose.

Use when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Plans and drafts the response; it does not produce new estimates or rewrite the paper.

Use when anticipating referee and co-editor objections for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript, or calibrating desk-reject risk and timeline expectations. Plans the defense and expectations; it does not draft the response letter (use jeea-rebuttal after a decision).