Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Language (LSA) via the Cambridge University Press ScholarOne portal — double-anonymous anonymization, the section and word-limit rules (General Research Article ≤18,000 words; Review Article ≤5,000), the abstract, Leipzig glossing, IPA, the Language Style Sheet, figure alt text, and open-access status. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill lang-submission --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lang Submission?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-lang-submission)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: lang-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Language (LSA) via the Cambridge University Press ScholarOne portal — double-anonymous anonymization, the section and word-limit rules (General Research Article ≤18,000 words; Review Article ≤5,000), the abstract, Leipzig glossing, IPA, the Language Style Sheet, figure alt text, and open-access status. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---
# Submission Preflight (lang-submission)
The last check before you press submit on **Cambridge University Press ScholarOne** — the portal for
*Language* since **January 2026**, when the journal moved to CUP and became **fully open access from
Volume 102**. *Language* is **double-anonymous**, so the most common avoidable failures are an
under-anonymized manuscript and self-citations that unmask the author. Also verify the **section and
word limits**, the **Language Style Sheet** citations, and the **Leipzig glossing / IPA** before upload.
Verify all volatile items on the live CUP/LSA author pages immediately before submission.
## When to trigger
- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which section, files, or metadata ScholarOne expects
- Confirming anonymization, word count, abstract, glossing, style, and alt text are all handled
## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)
- **Publisher / portal:** **Cambridge University Press**; submit via **ScholarOne** (since Jan 2026).
An **Overleaf template** is available; ScholarOne accepts LaTeX and Word workflows — confirm current
accepted formats.
- **Access:** **fully open access from Volume 102 (2026)**; check the current APC / waiver and any
read-and-publish agreement on the CUP page.
- **Review model:** **double-anonymous** — remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, and
identifying self-references; every effort must prevent authors and reviewers from identifying each
other.
- **Editors:** Shelome Gooden and Michael Putnam (verify the current masthead before naming an editor
in any submission-facing document; editorship rotates).
- **Sections & limits:**
- **General Research Article** — up to **18,000 words** *inclusive of notes, charts, tables, and
appendices but excluding references*; submissions **over 12,000 words** are assessed for
appropriateness and may face more stringent review.
- **Research Report** — a smaller, targeted contribution (shorter; confirm the current cap).
- **Review Article** — up to **5,000 words** (excluding references).
- **Discussion Notes**, **Reviews/Book Notices**, and the four **online-only sections** (Perspectives,
Phonological Analysis, Language and Public Policy, Teaching Linguistics).
- **Abstract:** required; short (target ~150 words — confirm the current limit on the author page).
- **House style:** the **Language Style Sheet** / **Unified Style Sheet for Linguistics** (author-date);
not APA or Chicago.
- **Examples:** numbered; **Leipzig interlinear glossing**; **IPA** in a Unicode font.
- **Figures:** provide **alt text / descriptive captions**; vector where possible.
- **Data:** include a data-availability statement; share analysis data/code where ethical (see
`lang-data-and-transparency`).
## Preflight checklist
### Section & length
- [ ] Correct section selected (General Research Article / Research Report / Review Article / other)
- [ ] Within the section's word limit; General Research Article word count computed on the inclusive rule
- [ ] Over 12,000 words only if the length is genuinely earned
### Anonymity (double-anonymous)
- [ ] No author names, affiliations, or acknowledgments in the manuscript
- [ ] Self-citations worded to avoid unmasking ("Author 2020", neutral phrasing)
- [ ] Identifying **file metadata stripped**; a separate title page if the portal requires it
### Content & format
- [ ] Abstract present, within the current word target, states question + data + finding
- [ ] Language Style Sheet citations and reference list (NOT APA/Chicago)
- [ ] Numbered examples, aligned Leipzig glosses, abbreviations listed, correct IPA
- [ ] Figure alt text / descriptive captions
- [ ] Data-availability statement accurate (no over-stated mandate)
- [ ] Not under review elsewhere (concurrent submission violates publishing ethics)
## Avoidable-failure triage (what bounces a submission, and the fix)
| Failure at submission | Fix before upload |
|-----------------------|-------------------|
| Author identity leaks (names, acknowledgments, metadata, unmasking self-cites) | anonymize text + strip metadata + neutralize self-references |
| Over the word limit / unearned length past 12,000 | cut to the section cap; earn every page |
| APA/Chicago references | convert to the Language/Unified Style Sheet |
| Misaligned glosses / faked IPA | fix Leipzig alignment; use a Unicode IPA font |
| Descriptive data dump, no theoretical stakes | frame the general claim (route to `lang-theory-building`) |
## Calibration (Language-specific posture, hedged)
Reflects *Language*'s house and culture, not universal rules; confirm on the live pages. The most
common avoidable failure is an under-anonymized file under double-anonymous review; the second is a word
count that misreads the **inclusive** General Research Article rule (notes and tables count; references
do not). Illustrative: a 12,800-word General Research Article catches three triage issues at preflight —
an acknowledgments footnote naming a grant and a collaborator, references still in APA from a prior
subfield-journal attempt, and two figures with no alt text — and after fixes the file is anonymous,
Style-Sheet-conformant, and within a defensible length.
## Anti-patterns
- Leaving author identifiers in the text, acknowledgments, or file metadata (breaks double-anonymous)
- Miscomputing the inclusive word limit or pushing past 12,000 without earning it
- APA/Chicago references instead of the Language/Unified Style Sheet
- Submitting a descriptive data dump with no theoretical claim (a desk return)
- Submitting while the paper is under review at another journal
## Output format
```
【Section】General Research Article / Research Report / Review Article / other
【Length】within cap on the inclusive rule; earned past 12,000? [Y/N]
【Anonymized】text + self-cites + metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Abstract】present, within limit, states question/data/finding? [Y/N]
【House style】Language/Unified Style Sheet (NOT APA/Chicago)? [Y/N]
【Glossing/IPA/alt text】examples, transcription, figures conform? [Y/N]
【Data statement】accurate, not over-stated? [Y/N]
【Next】lang-review-process → lang-rebuttal on R&R
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) — printable preflight checklist
- [`templates/manuscript_template.md`](templates/manuscript_template.md) — Language-conformant manuscript skeleton
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — CUP/LSA submission, style, and open-access sources
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!