Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

Use when writing the short proposal that gates an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the ≤5-page, four-heading proposal submitted under the twice-yearly deadlines before any full review is invited. Builds the proposal; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).

Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).

Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or redesign the framework from scratch (amann-organizing-framework).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).

Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing).

Use when deciding which amann-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when revising an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review for the house voice — authoritative, integrative, agenda-setting "reviews with an attitude," with a strong problem-first opening and a contribution-stating abstract. Polishes prose and structure; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or run the submission preflight (amann-submission).

Use when articulating what an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript contributes — converting findings into a claim that changes how the field understands accounting's social, organizational, behavioral or institutional operation. Frames the payoff; it does not produce new analysis (aos-data-analysis).

Use when analyzing the material of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — coding and interpreting qualitative field data, estimating experimental and survey models, or running theory-laden archival analyses, with an audit trail appropriate to each tradition. Analyzes and reports; it does not design the study (aos-methods).

Use when situating an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript in the literature — entering one of the journal's own long-running conversations, engaging the interdisciplinary sources (organization theory, sociology, psychology) those conversations draw on, and marking precisely what the paper adds. Positions the argument; it does not build the theory itself (aos-theory-development).

Use when designing the study for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — qualitative field studies (access, case logic, interviews, observation), behavioral experiments, surveys, historical/archival inquiry, or theory-laden archival designs, each with the ethics and site-anonymity groundwork done early. Designs the inquiry; it does not run the coding or estimation (aos-data-analysis).

Use when an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) revise-and-resubmit arrives — planning revisions that may include recoding field data, new experimental conditions, or deepened theorizing, and drafting the point-by-point response to an interdisciplinary reviewer panel. Drafts the response; it does not run new analysis (aos-data-analysis) or the final preflight (aos-submission).

Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — Editorial Manager files (anonymized manuscript, separate title page, declarations), Elsevier policies (competing interests, AI, ethics), and open-access decisions. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (aos-rebuttal).

Use when building the exhibits of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — data-inventory and evidence tables for qualitative work, cell-means and process-test tables for experiments, and figures that carry theoretical weight — in Elsevier-compatible format. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (aos-data-analysis).

Use when building the theoretical engine of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — choosing a social/organizational theory tradition (institutional theory, governmentality, Bourdieu, actor-network theory, practice theory, psychological process theory) and making it generate the analysis rather than decorate it. Builds the lens; it does not collect data (aos-methods) or frame the contribution (aos-contribution-framing).

Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).

Use when deciding which aos-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

Use when polishing the prose of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — sustained argumentative writing that carries theory and evidence together, a self-contained abstract, disciplined length despite the absence of a hard cap, and full anonymization for double-anonymized review. Polishes prose; it does not run the submission preflight (aos-submission).

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 稿件准备代码与数据可用性材料、判断本刊是否设有独立制品评审(artifact evaluation)徽章制度时调用。讲清本刊现状(以同行评议为主、无独立徽章制度的现况为待核实)、如何主动提供匿名可复现的代码/数据以增强说服力、控制仿真与实物实验制品的组织，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中用可用制品提升可信度。

当你在收到《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的外审意见、需要撰写退修说明与逐条答复信时调用。给出逐条对应审稿意见的答复结构、修改对照(改前→改后)、大修/小修的不同策略、对分歧意见的礼貌据理回应、保持双盲的匿名口径、以及按编辑部期限组织修改稿，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的多轮退修与重新送审中最大化被录用的机会。

当你在稿件被《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 录用后、需要完成定稿、清样校对、补齐署名与基金、按本刊体例排版并处理稿酬与出版排期时调用。覆盖录用后从匿名稿恢复作者信息、套用本刊定稿模板、中英文摘要与参考文献终校、校样(清样)逐处核对、样刊与稿酬安排，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 见刊前把清样打磨到零差错并理解稿酬与出版流程。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 设计与呈现实验、仿真或实物验证时调用。覆盖研究问题(RQ)驱动的实验设计、公平基线与对照、控制类的稳定性/收敛性/鲁棒性分析、模式识别类的指标与统计显著性、消融实验、仿真与实物平台的报告要素，帮助为控制理论、机器人、智能系统方向的中文稿搭建经得起 Acta Automatica Sinica 双盲外审的实证与理论证据链。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 撰写相关工作、文献综述或确立创新性(delta)时调用。给出以差异为先的文献组织法、控制/自动化/模式识别方向代表作的覆盖策略、与最接近工作的对比表、避免"重复前人/无新意"初审退稿的自检，以及综述栏目所需的分类框架与批判性评价方法，帮助在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的中英文双语与综述长文传统下清晰界定本文相对已有研究的增量。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 提升实验可复现性、组织复现包、防范数据污染时调用。覆盖环境与依赖固定、随机种子与多次运行、数据划分与防泄露、控制仿真的求解器/步长/系统参数记录、超参数与调参协议披露、以及配合双盲的匿名化复现材料，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿在 Acta Automatica Sinica 外审中经得起"结果能否复现"的追问。

当你在需要理解《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的双盲三审制审稿流程、各环节时间进度与作者可施加的杠杆时调用。建模编辑初审→双盲外审→退修/复审(多轮)→主编终审的完整链路，说明作者承诺前置、双盲对作者的约束、退修期限与重新送审、状态查询，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的评审各节点做出正确动作、管理预期并避免流程性失误。

当你在向《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 aas.net.cn 的 ScholarOne 投审稿系统(aas-cn)、双盲匿名化(删除页眉页脚/标题下方/尾注/文件名中的作者单位基金号)、全部作者签名加盖第一作者单位公章的《作者承诺》前置提交、只收原创非翻译稿与不接收 AI 署名、学术不端查重、栏目(综述/论文/短文)归属与退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文稿打磨到符合本刊双盲三审制门槛的场景。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 确定选题、判断稿件是否契合本刊控制与自动化学科定位、以及在综述/论文/短文三类栏目间定位时调用。帮助辨析本刊与兄弟中文刊(计算机学报/软件学报/电子学报/计算机研究与发展/计算机科学)的学科分工，评估创新性与贡献可数性，避免"主题超范围""无新意""重复前人"等初审退稿理由，并把选题打磨到匹配 Acta Automatica Sinica 的控制/模式识别/机器人/智能系统侧重与中英文双语综述长文传统。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 规划一次完整投稿的时间线、把 12 个技能编排成从选题到见刊的流水线时调用。给出选题定位→写作→实验→匿名投稿→双盲三审→多轮退修→录用定稿的阶段划分、每阶段的准入准出、里程碑与常见延误点，帮助作者在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双盲三审制与中英文双语综述长文传统下合理排期，避免作者承诺漏交、双盲泄露、退修超期等踩坑，并在每个节点指明应调用哪个 aas- 技能。

当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 撰写或打磨中文稿件体例时调用。覆盖报道性中英文摘要(目的/方法/结果/结论四要素)、中英文关键词、中图分类号(自动化/计算机类 TP 打头)、参考文献 GB/T 7714 顺序编码制著录、量与单位法定计量、控制类公式与图表规范、以及综述/论文/短文三类栏目的体例差异，帮助把控制理论、模式识别、机器人、智能系统方向的中文长文写到符合 Acta Automatica Sinica 的双语传统与编排要求。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 投稿准备代码、数据与硬件设计等研究制品(artifact)的可用性说明时使用。中文学报暂无独立的 artifact evaluation 徽章委员会，本技能说明本刊现状、如何自愿开放代码/数据以增强稿件可信度、如何在正文与附录中规范披露制品、如何在双盲阶段匿名托管仓库、以及电子/信号处理类工作(算法、电路、FPGA、数据集)的制品打包要点。帮助作者在没有强制徽章的前提下最大化《电子学报》稿件的可复现说服力。

在为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 撰写审稿意见答复与修回说明时调用。适用于收到编辑部"修改后再审/退修"通知后，逐条回应外审专家意见、撰写"修改说明"对照表、在正文中标注修改痕迹、处理相互矛盾或要求补做实验的意见、把握修回时限与再审轮次。帮助电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文稿件在《电子学报》多级审理中稳步走向录用，避免因答复不规范或情绪化措辞被再次退修甚至退稿。

当稿件被《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 录用后进入定稿、校样与清样阶段时使用。覆盖录用通知后的版权协议签署、按最终排版规范核对中英文题名/摘要/关键词/中图分类号、补全双盲阶段隐去的作者信息与基金编号、GB/T 7714 参考文献终校、图表与公式的印刷级质量、校样(清样)一校二校流程、版面费缴纳、DOI 与出版时序确认。帮助电子/信息/通信方向作者把已录用稿件零差错地送到《电子学报》正式出版。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件设计与呈现实验/仿真时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验目标与假设、数据集与仿真设置、基线与对比公平性、评价指标(SNR/BER/误差/准确率/资源占用)、消融与参数敏感性、统计显著性与多次运行、图表呈现规范、以及硬件/FPGA/测量实验的条件报告。帮助作者用严谨、可复现、对比公平的实验证据支撑创新点，抵御《电子学报》外审专家对"实验不充分、对比不公平、结果偶然"的质疑。

在为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件撰写相关工作与文献综述时调用。覆盖如何界定领域范围、系统检索中外文献(CNKI/万方/IEEE/dblp)、按技术脉络而非流水账组织综述、突出与本文的区别与本文创新点、恰当引用本刊及英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的相关论文、GB/T 7714 引用规范、以及双盲阶段自引匿名化。帮助电子/信息/信号处理方向作者写出既显示学科视野、又清晰定位本文贡献的相关工作章节，避免因综述薄弱或漏引关键文献被外审质疑创新性。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件强化可复现性与实验可重复时使用。覆盖电子/信息/信号处理/通信类工作的实验环境记录、随机性控制、数据与预处理透明、算法伪代码与超参数完整披露、硬件与仿真工具链版本、统计显著性与多次运行、以及在中文学报正文与附录里如何组织可复现信息。帮助作者用可复现性作为通过《电子学报》外审、抵御"结果无法重复"质疑的核心竞争力，而非事后补救。

当你需要理解《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 审稿流程、稿件状态与时限时使用。覆盖投稿受理→编辑初审→双盲外审(同行评议)→复审→主编/编委会终审→退修与再审轮次→录用的多级审理链路，各阶段可能的决定(录用/退修/退稿)、6 个月未答复红线、如何解读稿件状态、如何礼貌催稿、以及本刊与英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的分流关系。帮助电子/信息/通信方向作者对《电子学报》的审理节奏与决策点建立准确预期，合理规划投稿与修回。

在向《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 正式提交稿件前做投稿就绪审计时调用。覆盖官网 ejournal.org.cn 在线投稿系统、注册与稿件同步、官方 Word/LaTeX 模板、中英文摘要与关键词、中图分类号(TN 为主)、GB/T 7714 参考文献、双盲评审的匿名化要求、稿件评审费(中文约 199 元/英文约 260 元 待核实以系统为准)、涉密脱敏、栏目归属与稿件类型选择，并在上传前做退稿风险分诊。适用于把一份电子/信息/通信/信号处理方向的中文原创论文打磨到符合本刊四级审理门槛的场景。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 稿件组织附录与补充材料时使用。覆盖哪些内容应放正文、哪些应下沉到附录/在线补充材料、多媒体附件(音视频/信号波形/大数据表)的提交方式、公式推导与完整证明的呈现、扩展实验与超参数表、双盲阶段补充材料的匿名化、以及与正文的引用对应关系。帮助电子/信息/信号处理方向作者在《电子学报》有限正文篇幅内保持主线清晰，同时用补充材料完整承载可复现细节与扩展证据。

当你为《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 判断选题是否对口、定位到合适栏目/学科方向时使用。覆盖本刊电子科学与技术、信息与通信工程、信号与信息处理、电路与系统、电磁场与微波、集成电路等学科侧重，如何评估选题的创新性与本刊契合度、区别于计算机类与控制类兄弟刊、判断投中文《电子学报》还是英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics、以及原创论文与综述的定位差异。帮助作者在动笔前就把选题放进《电子学报》的正确坐标，避免因不对口在初审被退。

当你需要《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 投稿全流程总览与阶段调度时使用。把选题、写作、投稿、双盲外审、多级审理、修回、录用、校样到出版串成一条端到端时间线，指明每个阶段该调用哪个 aes-* 技能、关键决策点、6 个月答复红线、与英文姊妹刊 Chinese Journal of Electronics 的分流时机、以及常见时间陷阱。适合电子/信息/通信方向作者在动笔前或投稿中做整体规划，避免顺序错乱、错过时限或在错误阶段做错误的事。

当你按《电子学报》(Acta Electronica Sinica, AES) 规范打磨中文科技论文写作时使用。覆盖中英文题名、结构式中文摘要与英文 Abstract、中英文关键词、中图分类号(TN 大类)、量和单位与法定计量、公式与变量排版、图表规范、GB/T 7714 顺序编码制参考文献中英文著录、以及电子/信息/信号处理领域术语与数学表达的一致性。帮助作者写出符合《电子学报》体例、语言严谨、可被外审专家顺畅评阅的中文旗舰学报稿件，避免因写作不规范在初审或外审被扣分。

Use when drafting the cover letter for an Advanced Materials submission, whose core job is to convince the editor that the work is a genuine materials advance of broad impact worthy of the journal. Argues the impact case; does not fix the science or format the manuscript.

Use when designing or auditing figures for an Advanced Materials manuscript, including the lead figure, multi-panel characterization figures, and the Table-of-Contents graphic, where visual quality is a house expectation. Designs figure strategy; does not run the analysis or write prose.

Use when an Advanced Materials manuscript must be fit to its article-type format — Communication versus Research Article — where word count and display items are budgeted together against a typeset page limit. Manages the length budget; does not restructure the science or polish prose line by line.

Use when deciding what characterization and experimental detail an Advanced Materials manuscript must show to prove its structure–property claim, and what belongs in the Experimental Section and Supporting Information. Partitions and stress-tests methods; does not design figures or run analysis.

Use when choosing suggested and opposed referees for an Advanced Materials submission and pre-empting the objections materials reviewers most often raise. Plans referee selection and objection defense; does not write the manuscript or the rebuttal.