Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Advmat Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-advmat-workflow)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: advmat-workflow
description: Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
---
# Advanced Materials Workflow (advmat-workflow)
## Overview
This is the router. It does not do the work of any specialized skill; it names **which advmat-* skill fits your current stage** and hands off.
Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is **Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.)** — Wiley-VCH's flagship materials-science journal. The defining bar is a genuine **materials-science advance** (a new material, mechanism, or property — not an incremental improvement) that is **rigorously characterized by multiple complementary techniques**, ideally carried through to a **device-level demonstration benchmarked against the state of the art**, and communicated with **cover-quality figures**. If the work is solid but incremental or narrowly functional, its home is more likely **Advanced Functional Materials**, **Advanced Science**, **Small**, or **Advanced Materials Interfaces**, and `advmat-scope-fit` will say so.
## When to trigger
- User asks "what should I do next?" on a materials manuscript
- User drops a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
- User is unsure whether the result is "Adv. Mater.-worthy" or belongs in a sibling Advanced-portfolio journal
- The manuscript is over the Communication/Article length format and content must be re-partitioned
- User received a Wiley reviewer report and needs to switch into response mode
## Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| Unsure if the advance is novel / broad enough for Adv. Mater. | `advmat-scope-fit` |
| Result is real but the "why this is an advance" is unclear | `advmat-results-framing` |
| Characterization is thin, or the experimental section sprawls | `advmat-methods` |
| Figures are dense; no cover-quality lead figure or TOC graphic | `advmat-figures` |
| Manuscript leans on the SI; reader can't follow without it | `advmat-supplementary` |
| Prose is wordy, hedged, or not Wiley house style | `advmat-writing-style` |
| Over the Communication (~4 pp) or Article (~10 pp) format budget | `advmat-length-management`|
| Need a cover letter that argues advance + broad impact | `advmat-cover-letter` |
| Ready to submit; need format / file / metadata preflight | `advmat-submission` |
| Choosing suggested/opposed referees; anticipating objections | `advmat-referee-strategy` |
| Received a reviewer report or editor decision; need to respond | `advmat-revision` |
## Default order
1. `advmat-scope-fit` — settle the advance + broad-impact gate first; redirect to a sibling journal if it fails
2. `advmat-results-framing` — lock the single central advance and its significance
3. `advmat-methods` — make the multi-technique characterization airtight; full experimental detail to the SI
4. `advmat-figures` — design the lead figure and the TOC graphic to convey the advance at a glance
5. `advmat-supplementary` — partition extended data / methods into Supporting Information; the paper must stand alone
6. `advmat-writing-style` — Wiley house style, concision, defined nomenclature and units
7. `advmat-length-management` — fit the Communication or Article format (display items and words counted together)
8. `advmat-cover-letter` — argue the advance + broad-impact case to the editors
9. `advmat-submission` — final preflight (format, files, article type, ORCID, TOC graphic)
10. `advmat-referee-strategy` — suggested / opposed referees; pre-empt the characterization / benchmarking objections
11. `advmat-revision` — after the reviewer reports arrive
> `advmat-writing-style` and `advmat-length-management` are **late polish stages**. Do not trim to the page format before the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, or you will cut load-bearing evidence.
## Decision heuristics
- "Reviewer 2 will ask 'why not Adv. Funct. Mater.?'" → `advmat-scope-fit`
- "I can state the material but not why it is a genuine advance" → `advmat-results-framing`
- "A referee will say the phase assignment isn't proven" → `advmat-methods`
- "My lead figure has ten panels and no single takeaway" → `advmat-figures`
- "You can't judge the material without reading the SI" → `advmat-supplementary`
- "I'm over the page limit and every figure is huge" → `advmat-length-management`
- "The editor needs to be told why this matters beyond my subfield" → `advmat-cover-letter`
- "Submitting tonight" → `advmat-submission`
- "Who should I suggest as a referee?" → `advmat-referee-strategy`
- "Three reviewer reports just landed" → `advmat-revision`
## Manuscript status board
Readiness is a two-column question: is the *science* settled, and does it *fit the format*? Fill this board before invoking `advmat-submission`; any cell still marked OPEN routes you back to the named skill.
```text
ADV. MATER. STATUS BOARD verdict owner skill
======================================== ======== =====================
GATE materials advance + broad impact OPEN advmat-scope-fit
(fails → retarget AFM / Adv.Sci.)
ADVANCE one central new material / OPEN advmat-results-framing
mechanism / property, stated plainly
CHAR multi-technique characterization OPEN advmat-methods
proves structure→property claim
FIG lead figure + TOC graphic = OPEN advmat-figures
the advance at a glance
SI paper stands alone; SI holds OPEN advmat-supplementary
extended data / full experimental
STYLE Wiley house style, units defined OPEN advmat-writing-style
FIT inside Communication / Article OPEN advmat-length-management
format (display items counted)
CASE cover letter argues advance+impact OPEN advmat-cover-letter
REFS suggested / opposed referees named OPEN advmat-referee-strategy
---------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------
all rows CLOSED → advmat-submission preflight → submit
reviewer report arrives → advmat-revision
```
## Differences vs. sibling Advanced-portfolio journals
Advanced Materials shares Wiley-VCH production and rigor standards with Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, and Advanced Materials Interfaces, but differs on the **gate**:
- **Adv. Mater.**: a broadly significant materials advance — a new material, mechanism, or property that reshapes how a field thinks. Incremental optimization is declined on impact grounds even when flawless.
- **AFM / Small / Adv. Sci. / AMI**: excellent, rigorous, but appropriately specialist or incremental work with a well-defined audience.
If `advmat-scope-fit` returns a "specialist / incremental" verdict, retarget rather than fighting the impact gate.
## Anti-patterns
- **Do not** skip `advmat-scope-fit` — editors triage on advance/impact first; a wrong-venue paper burns a submission cycle
- **Do not** run `advmat-length-management` before the science is stable — you will cut characterization the referees need
- **Do not** let the Supporting Information become the place where the real evidence hides
- **Do not** draft `advmat-revision` responses before you have actually changed the manuscript and added the requested data
> Durable norms only. Verify current word/page limits, article types, formats, and policies on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!