Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-writing-style --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Amanthro Writing Style?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-amanthro-writing-style)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: amanthro-writing-style
description: Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
---
# Writing Style (amanthro-writing-style)
An AA paper must be readable by an anthropologist outside its subfield, written with the craft AA prizes
(strong ethnographic prose, a clear argument, reflexive voice), formatted to **Chicago author-date**,
and disciplined to the section's word cap. AA also asks for **inclusive language** and **citational
practices that lift marginalized voices** — style here is partly an ethical commitment.
## When to trigger
- Drafting the introduction, framing the contribution, or final polish
- Over the word cap and needing to cut without losing the argument or the ethnography
- Writing the **200-word abstract**
- Aligning citations/format to AA house style before submission
## Reach all four fields
1. **Front-load the contribution.** By the end of the introduction the reader knows the question, the
argument, the evidence, and why it matters to anthropology broadly — don't make a generalist dig.
2. **Minimize subfield jargon** or define it on first use; an archaeologist should follow a linguistic
paper. Spell out acronyms; gloss technical terms.
3. **Argument-first, but keep the craft.** AA values vivid ethnographic writing and a reflexive voice;
lead with claims and let well-chosen scenes and evidence carry them. Avoid both dry report prose and
description with no argument.
4. **Write with care.** Use **inclusive language**; represent interlocutors and communities with
dignity (avoid deficit framing); consider **citational politics** in who you cite and foreground.
## Format to AA house style
- **Citations:** **Chicago Manual of Style author-date**; AA accepts **free-format** submissions
(you need not perfectly style-conform at first submission), but keep one consistent style and include
**DOIs** where available. Manage with Zotero/BibTeX.
- **Abstract:** **200 words**.
- **Anonymize:** AA review is **anonymous** — no author names/affiliations in the manuscript or file
name; supply a separate title page; neutralize obvious self-references and strip file metadata.
- **Land acknowledgment / positionality:** include where appropriate to the work and community.
## Fit the word cap (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words incl. figures, tables, references, notes; abstract 200)
- Tighten throat-clearing and literature dumps; engage the conversation, not every paper
(see `amanthro-literature-positioning`).
- Choose the scenes and exhibits that argue; cut redundant description.
- Notes count toward the limit — keep them lean.
- If the piece is short and engaged, target the right section (Essay 2,000–3,000; Commentary ≤ 1,500;
Review Essay ≤ 5,000) rather than padding toward a Research Article.
## Anti-patterns
- A subfield-insider intro that never states four-field significance
- Burying the contribution under pages of description before the argument appears
- An abstract over 200 words or one that hides the finding
- Deficit or othering language toward communities; a "view from nowhere" with no positionality
- A bibliography that foregrounds only metropolitan theorists
- Padding an Essay/Commentary toward Research-Article length
## Output format
```
【Contribution stated by end of intro?】[Y/N]
【Reads across the four fields?】jargon defined / acronyms spelled? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤ 200)
【Word count】Research Article ≤ 8,000 (incl. figures/tables/refs/notes)?
【Chicago author-date + anonymized + DOIs】[Y/N]
【Care-ful language + citational politics】[Y/N]
【Next】amanthro-transparency-and-data
```
## Supplementary resources
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date, anonymity, inclusive-language guidance
- [`../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md`](../../resources/worked-examples/01-introduction.md) — before→after AA-style introduction
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!