Claude Skills by brycewang-stanford

Use when targeting International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for software engineering flagship.

Use when targeting International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for satisfiability.

Use when targeting International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for database flagship.

Use when targeting International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI/ML flagship.

Use when targeting International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for language generation.

Use when targeting International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for semantic web.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer architecture flagship.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (DARS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for multi-robot systems.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for empirical software engineering.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for experimental robotics.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for attacks and defenses.

Use when targeting International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for robotics research.

Use when targeting INTERSPEECH (INTERSPEECH) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for speech processing.

Use when targeting Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for language resources.

Use when targeting Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI for health.

Use when targeting International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for medical imaging AI.

Use when targeting Mining Software Repositories (MSR) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for software analytics.

Use when targeting Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for security flagship.

Use when targeting Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI/ML flagship.

Use when targeting Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for NLP regional flagship.

Use when targeting Pacific Graphics (Pacific Graphics) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer graphics.

Use when targeting Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium (PETS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for privacy.

Use when targeting RoboCup Symposium (RoboCup) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for robotics competitions.

Use when targeting Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for robotics flagship.

Use when targeting SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for data mining.

Use when targeting SIGDIAL Conference on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for dialogue systems.

Use when targeting StarSem Conference on Computational Semantics (*SEM) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computational semantics.

Use when targeting Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for retrieval evaluation.

Use when targeting The Web Conference (WWW) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for web and AI.

Use when targeting Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for AI statistics.

Use when targeting USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for systems.

Use when targeting USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for storage systems.

Use when targeting USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for security flagship.

Use when targeting USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for networked systems.

Use when targeting USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for systems flagship.

Use when targeting IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for computer vision applications.

Use when sharpening the conservation significance and actionable implications of a Conservation Biology manuscript. The journal requires results to have direct, transferable implications for conserving biological diversity and to bridge science and practice. Frames the so-what and the recommendations; it does not overstate evidence or fabricate impact.

Use when executing and reporting the analysis for a Conservation Biology manuscript so it survives expert, double-blind review — appropriate ecological/statistical models, honest uncertainty, robustness, and reproducibility. Covers detection, hierarchical models, spatial structure, and effect sizes that matter for conservation. Guides analysis norms; it does not fabricate results.

Use when building tables, figures, and maps for a Conservation Biology manuscript so exhibits are self-contained, accessible, and respect the journal's exhibit budget (about one table or figure per four pages of text). Covers maps, effect plots, and masking sensitive species locations. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

Use when positioning a Conservation Biology manuscript against the literature so it reads as a novel, transferable contribution to conservation science. Conservation Biology readers span ecology, social science, and practice, so the paper must engage the relevant conservation literatures and state the gap precisely. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

Use when preparing the data-availability statement and the data/code archive for a Conservation Biology manuscript. The journal (Wiley/SCB) expects supporting data and code to be deposited in a public repository such as Dryad with a persistent identifier, and sensitive species data to be protected. Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

Use to understand how Conservation Biology evaluates a manuscript — double-blind peer review (adopted 2014), editorial screening for scope/novelty/conservation relevance, the editorial-board structure, decision categories, and the Registered Reports route. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.

Use when writing the response to a Conservation Biology revise-and-resubmit. Decisions weigh novelty, transferability, methodological soundness, and direct conservation relevance, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the handling editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

Use when defending the study design of a Conservation Biology manuscript — ecological sampling and inference (detection, spatial structure, pseudoreplication), comparative/observational and quasi-experimental designs (BACI), modeling and synthesis design, and human-dimensions methods. The journal judges each appropriate method on its own terms. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Conservation Biology via Wiley's ScholarOne Manuscript Central — article-type selection, double-blind preparation, word/abstract caps, Style Guide formatting, data-availability statement, and declarations. Final checks; it does not draft content.

Use when deciding whether a project fits Conservation Biology and which article type to target. Conservation Biology is the Society for Conservation Biology's flagship journal, so the test is novelty plus transferable, direct relevance to conserving biological diversity, not local description alone. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

Use as the entry point for any Conservation Biology manuscript. Routes to the right conbio sub-skill based on where you are in the science lifecycle and which article type (Contributed Paper, Research Note, Review, Essay, Conservation Practice and Policy, Comment) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

Use when drafting or polishing a Conservation Biology manuscript so it reads accessibly for a broad conservation audience, follows the journal Style Guide, and fits the per-type word caps (e.g., Contributed Papers ~6,000–7,000; abstract <= 300 words). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

Use when turning results into an explicit contribution for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — articulating what the paper adds to accounting knowledge and to practice/standard-setting, adapted to whether the contribution is archival evidence, an experimental mechanism, or an analytical insight. Frames the contribution; it does not position the literature (car-literature-positioning).

Use when running and reporting the analysis for a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — the right estimator for archival/capital-markets, experimental, or analytical-calibration work, robustness, and CAR's Data Integrity & Code Sharing Policy (code archiving, variable definitions, data availability statement). Executes and reports; it does not design the study (car-methods).