Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Ci Submission

ASecurity

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Critical Inquiry (CI) via Editorial Manager — format selection, the 9,500-word limit (including discursive notes and all bibliographical information), Microsoft Word manuscript, Chicago (17th ed.) footnotes with no works-cited list, separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF images with author-secured permissions, and the no-simultaneous-submission rule. Final checks; it does not draft content.

1,052 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 6/5/2026
ai-agentsgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ci-submission --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ci Submission?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ci Submission
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/brycewang-stanford-ci-submission/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/brycewang-stanford-ci-submission)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: ci-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Critical Inquiry (CI) via Editorial Manager — format selection, the 9,500-word limit (including discursive notes and all bibliographical information), Microsoft Word manuscript, Chicago (17th ed.) footnotes with no works-cited list, separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF images with author-secured permissions, and the no-simultaneous-submission rule. Final checks; it does not draft content.
---

# Submission Preflight (ci-submission)

The last check before pressing submit on **Editorial Manager** (`editorialmanager.com/ci/`). CI's most
common avoidable failures are a manuscript over the **9,500-word** cap (because notes were not counted)
and images that are embedded, low-resolution, or uncleared. Verify volatile specifics on the official
page before relying on them.

## When to trigger

- "Submitting tomorrow" — last pass before upload
- Unsure which files / format Editorial Manager expects
- Confirming the chosen format's cap is met and images are prepared correctly

## Process facts (verify volatile items on the official page)

- **Publisher:** University of Chicago Press (journal founded 1974).
- **Portal:** **Editorial Manager** (`editorialmanager.com/ci/`); special-issue proposals may go to
  `cisubmissions[at]gmail.com`.
- **Review model:** peer-reviewed; reviewed by the **editors-in-chief in consultation with the
  editorial team**.
- **Formats & caps:** **Article ≤ 9,500 words** (**includes discursive notes and all bibliographical
  information**); **Critical Response ≤ 3,000 words**; **Review ≤ 500 words**.
- **Manuscript file:** **Microsoft Word**.
- **Citations:** **Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed.** footnotes, numbered consecutively; **no
  works-cited list** (待核实 on 17th vs 18th ed.).
- **Images:** **separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF** files, not embedded; **author secures permissions** before
  publication.
- **Multiple submission:** **not accepted** — not under consideration elsewhere.
- **Fee:** **no submission fee** stated; optional **Gold open access** APC (待核实 on amount/eligibility).
- **Abstract:** none specified in the guidelines (待核实).

## Preflight checklist

### Format & length
- [ ] Format chosen and its cap met (Article ≤ 9,500 / Response ≤ 3,000 / Review ≤ 500)
- [ ] Word count **includes discursive notes and all bibliographical information**
- [ ] Manuscript is a **Microsoft Word** file

### Citations & apparatus
- [ ] Chicago (17th ed.) **footnotes**, numbered consecutively; **no works-cited list**
- [ ] Notes are lean enough to stay within the word cap

### Images & permissions
- [ ] Images as **separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF** files (not embedded), with caption + **credit line**
- [ ] **Permissions secured** by the author for all published images

### Policy & files
- [ ] **Not** submitted simultaneously elsewhere
- [ ] Original work; manuscript appropriate to CI's interdisciplinary remit
- [ ] Special-issue proposal routed correctly (if applicable)

## Anti-patterns

- Forgetting that notes count — a body-only count under 9,500 but a total over it
- Embedding images, supplying low-resolution files, or leaving permissions uncleared
- Adding a works-cited list or using author-date instead of footnotes
- Submitting to CI and another journal at once
- Budgeting for a submission fee that is not charged

## Output format

```
【Format】Article / Response / Review (cap met incl. notes? Y/N)
【Word count】total incl. notes + all bibliographical info
【Citations】Chicago 17th footnotes, no works-cited list? [Y/N]
【Manuscript file】Microsoft Word? [Y/N]
【Images】separate 300 ppi JPEG/TIFF + permissions? [Y/N]
【Single submission】not elsewhere? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → ci-revision-and-response
```

## Supplementary resources

- [`../../resources/external_tools.md`](../../resources/external_tools.md) — portal, file formats, image specs, Chicago tooling
- [`../../resources/official-source-map.md`](../../resources/official-source-map.md) — official CI URLs behind every fact in this pack

Attribution

brycewang-stanfordbrycewang-stanford
View sourceMore from brycewang-stanford →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1066601 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693161 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

651 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →