Skip to content
Back to skills

Supabase Audit Auth Users

ASecurity

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities through various authentication endpoints.

  • 68 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added February 8, 2026
securitytypescriptpythongobashtestingapidatabasesecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Supabase Audit Auth Users?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Supabase Audit Auth Users
[![Security: A โ€” Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yoanbernabeu-supabase-audit-auth-users/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yoanbernabeu-supabase-audit-auth-users)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: supabase-audit-auth-users
description: Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities through various authentication endpoints.
---

# User Enumeration Audit

> ๐Ÿ”ด **CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED**
>
> You MUST write to context files **AS YOU GO**, not just at the end.
> - Write to `.sb-pentest-context.json` **IMMEDIATELY after each endpoint tested**
> - Log to `.sb-pentest-audit.log` **BEFORE and AFTER each test**
> - **DO NOT** wait until the skill completes to update files
> - If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved
>
> **This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.**

This skill tests for user enumeration vulnerabilities in authentication flows.

## When to Use This Skill

- To check if user existence can be detected
- To test login, signup, and recovery flows for information leakage
- As part of authentication security audit
- Before production deployment

## Prerequisites

- Supabase URL and anon key available
- Auth endpoints accessible

## What is User Enumeration?

User enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a user account exists through:

| Vector | Indicator |
|--------|-----------|
| Different error messages | "User not found" vs "Wrong password" |
| Response timing | Fast for non-existent, slow for existing |
| Response codes | 404 vs 401 |
| Signup response | "Email already registered" |

## Why It Matters

| Risk | Impact |
|------|--------|
| Targeted attacks | Attackers know valid accounts |
| Phishing | Confirm targets have accounts |
| Credential stuffing | Reduce attack scope |
| Privacy | Reveal user presence |

## Tests Performed

| Endpoint | Test Method |
|----------|-------------|
| `/auth/v1/signup` | Try registering existing email |
| `/auth/v1/token` | Try login with various emails |
| `/auth/v1/recover` | Try password reset |
| `/auth/v1/otp` | Try OTP for various emails |

## Usage

### Basic Enumeration Test

```
Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities
```

### Test Specific Endpoint

```
Test login endpoint for user enumeration
```

## Output Format

```
โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•
 USER ENUMERATION AUDIT
โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Signup Endpoint (/auth/v1/signup)
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 Test: POST with known existing email
 Response for existing: "User already registered"
 Response for new email: User object returned

 Status: ๐ŸŸ  P2 - ENUMERABLE

 The response clearly indicates if an email is registered.

 Exploitation:
 ```bash
 curl -X POST https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/signup \
   -H "apikey: [anon-key]" \
   -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
   -d '{"email": "target@example.com", "password": "test123"}'

 # If user exists: {"msg": "User already registered"}
 # If new user: User created or confirmation needed
 ```

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Login Endpoint (/auth/v1/token)
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 Test: POST with different email scenarios

 Existing email, wrong password:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 245ms
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 400

 Non-existing email:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 52ms โ† Significantly faster!
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 400

 Status: ๐ŸŸ  P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

 Although the error message is the same, the response
 time is noticeably different:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Existing user: ~200-300ms (password hashing)
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Non-existing: ~50-100ms (no hash check)

 Timing Attack PoC:
 ```python
 import requests
 import time

 def check_user(email):
     start = time.time()
     requests.post(
         'https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/token',
         params={'grant_type': 'password'},
         json={'email': email, 'password': 'wrong'},
         headers={'apikey': '[anon-key]'}
     )
     elapsed = time.time() - start
     return elapsed > 0.15  # Threshold

 exists = check_user('target@example.com')
 ```

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Password Recovery (/auth/v1/recover)
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 Test: POST recovery request for different emails

 Existing email:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 1250ms (email actually sent)
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 200

 Non-existing email:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 85ms โ† Much faster (no email sent)
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 200

 Status: ๐ŸŸ  P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

 Same message, but timing reveals existence.
 Existing users trigger actual email sending (~1s+).

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Magic Link / OTP (/auth/v1/otp)
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 Test: Request OTP for different emails

 Existing email:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"message": "OTP sent"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 1180ms
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 200

 Non-existing email:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Response: {"error": "User not found"}
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ Time: 95ms
 โ””โ”€โ”€ Code: 400

 Status: ๐Ÿ”ด P1 - DIRECTLY ENUMERABLE

 The error message explicitly states user doesn't exist.

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Summary
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 Endpoints Tested: 4
 Enumerable: 4 (100%)

 Vulnerability Severity:
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ ๐Ÿ”ด P1: OTP endpoint (explicit message)
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ ๐ŸŸ  P2: Signup endpoint (explicit message)
 โ”œโ”€โ”€ ๐ŸŸ  P2: Login endpoint (timing attack)
 โ””โ”€โ”€ ๐ŸŸ  P2: Recovery endpoint (timing attack)

 Overall User Enumeration Risk: HIGH

 An attacker can determine if any email address
 has an account in your application.

 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€
 Mitigation Recommendations
 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

 1. CONSISTENT RESPONSES
    Return identical messages for all scenarios:
    "If an account exists, you will receive an email"

 2. CONSISTENT TIMING
    Add artificial delay to normalize response times:
    ```typescript
    const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1000; // 1 second
    const start = Date.now();
    // ... perform auth operation ...
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));
    return response;
    ```

 3. RATE LIMITING
    Already enabled: 3/hour per IP
    Consider per-email rate limiting too.

 4. CAPTCHA
    Add CAPTCHA for repeated attempts:
    - After 3 failed logins
    - For password recovery
    - For signup

 5. MONITORING
    Alert on enumeration patterns:
    - Many requests with different emails
    - Sequential email patterns (user1@, user2@, ...)

โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•
```

## Timing Analysis

The skill measures response times to detect timing-based enumeration:

```
Existing user:
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Password hash verification: ~200-300ms
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Email sending: ~1000-2000ms
โ””โ”€โ”€ Database lookup: ~5-20ms

Non-existing user:
โ”œโ”€โ”€ No hash verification: 0ms
โ”œโ”€โ”€ No email sending: 0ms
โ””โ”€โ”€ Database lookup: ~5-20ms (not found)
```

Threshold detection:
- Difference > 100ms: Possible timing leak
- Difference > 500ms: Definite timing leak

## Context Output

```json
{
  "user_enumeration": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T13:30:00Z",
    "endpoints_tested": 4,
    "vulnerabilities": [
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
        "severity": "P1",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "OTP sent",
        "missing_response": "User not found"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/signup",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "User already registered",
        "missing_response": "User created"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 245,
        "missing_time_ms": 52
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/recover",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 1250,
        "missing_time_ms": 85
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

## Mitigation Code Examples

### Consistent Response Time

```typescript
// Edge Function with normalized timing
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1500; // 1.5 seconds

Deno.serve(async (req) => {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    // Perform actual auth operation
    const result = await handleAuth(req);

    // Normalize response time
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    return new Response(JSON.stringify(result));
  } catch (error) {
    // Same timing for errors
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    // Generic error message
    return new Response(JSON.stringify({
      message: "Check your email if you have an account"
    }));
  }
});
```

### Generic Error Messages

```typescript
// Don't reveal user existence
async function requestPasswordReset(email: string) {
  // Always return success message
  const response = {
    message: "If an account with that email exists, " +
             "you will receive a password reset link."
  };

  // Perform actual reset in background (don't await)
  supabase.auth.resetPasswordForEmail(email).catch(() => {});

  return response;
}
```

## MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

โš ๏ธ **This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.**

### Critical Rule: Write As You Go

**DO NOT** batch all writes at the end. Instead:

1. **Before testing each endpoint** โ†’ Log the action to `.sb-pentest-audit.log`
2. **After each timing measurement** โ†’ Immediately update `.sb-pentest-context.json`
3. **After each enumeration vector found** โ†’ Log the finding immediately

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

### Required Actions (Progressive)

1. **Update `.sb-pentest-context.json`** with results:
   ```json
   {
     "user_enumeration": {
       "timestamp": "...",
       "endpoints_tested": 4,
       "vulnerabilities": [ ... ]
     }
   }
   ```

2. **Log to `.sb-pentest-audit.log`**:
   ```
   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [START] Testing user enumeration
   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [FINDING] P1: OTP endpoint enumerable
   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [CONTEXT_UPDATED] .sb-pentest-context.json updated
   ```

3. **If files don't exist**, create them before writing.

**FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.**

## MANDATORY: Evidence Collection

๐Ÿ“ **Evidence Directory:** `.sb-pentest-evidence/05-auth-audit/enumeration-tests/`

### Evidence Files to Create

| File | Content |
|------|---------|
| `enumeration-tests/login-timing.json` | Login endpoint timing analysis |
| `enumeration-tests/recovery-timing.json` | Recovery endpoint timing |
| `enumeration-tests/otp-enumeration.json` | OTP endpoint message analysis |

### Evidence Format

```json
{
  "evidence_id": "AUTH-ENUM-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
  "category": "auth-audit",
  "type": "user_enumeration",

  "tests": [
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
      "test_type": "timing_attack",
      "severity": "P2",

      "existing_user_test": {
        "email": "[KNOWN_EXISTING]@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 245,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "nonexisting_user_test": {
        "email": "definitely-not-exists@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 52,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "timing_difference_ms": 193,
      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Can determine if email has account via timing"
    },
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
      "test_type": "explicit_message",
      "severity": "P1",

      "existing_user_response": {"message": "OTP sent"},
      "nonexisting_user_response": {"error": "User not found"},

      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Error message explicitly reveals user existence"
    }
  ],

  "curl_commands": [
    "# Timing test - existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"existing@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'",
    "# Timing test - non-existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"nonexistent@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'"
  ]
}
```

## Related Skills

- `supabase-audit-auth-config` โ€” Full auth configuration
- `supabase-audit-auth-signup` โ€” Signup flow testing
- `supabase-report` โ€” Include in final report

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading commentsโ€ฆ

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.