Skip to content
Back to skills

Verify

ASecurity

Assess whether current engineering work, applicable reviews and actual evidence justify a scoped result or final completion. Keep Verify separate from authoring and whole-change Code Review.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 2, 2026
developmentgosql

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 8 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 7, 2026

npx -y skills add xiongxianfei/rigorloop --skill verify --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Verify?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Verify
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/xiongxianfei-verify/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/xiongxianfei-verify)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: verify
description: Assess whether current engineering work, applicable reviews and actual evidence justify a scoped result or final completion. Keep Verify separate from authoring and whole-change Code Review.
---

# Verify

State whether the requested assessment is scoped or final. Read accepted IR/SRs and applicable ARs, reviewed System/Architecture Design, delivery intent, actual implementation/work, open issues and selected current evidence. For final success, require adequate applicable whole-change Code Review and current support for the other mandatory bases. A review for every milestone is not required.

Run the applicable repository checks and any required direct validation; report commands actually executed, results and limitations. Reuse evidence only where its scope and applicability justify it. Trace evidence through implementation/work to governing SR/AR and accepted IR/request basis. Saving records or passing schemas does not satisfy engineering obligations.

Keep correction ownership: implementation defects return to implement, requirement defects to requirement-analysis, and design defects to their responsible designer. Independently reassess materially changed subjects, then reverify. Verify cannot fix code and silently approve that correction. An evidence-collection retry alone does not require another Code Review; contradictory evidence requires assessing its effect on earlier reliance.

Record an explicit Verification assessment, including support and limitations. Current support means recorded dependencies are reconciled; it does not establish unreported repository stability. Renewing a Review does not renew a stale Verification automatically. Failed and inconclusive results remain recordable without a success claim.

Only after successful final assessment, use change complete to retain the compact delivered outcome, actual acceptance basis, limitations and selected useful attachments. Preserve meaningful deferred follow-up; it cannot waive mandatory acceptance. Completion is historical and stops tracking later repository applicability. A later regression is linked new work; an error in the original account gets an explicit completion note.

Continue to the pr skill when external handoff is authorized. Commit, PR, merge and release remain separate actions; a completion save does not authorize them.

## Recording boundary

For Change-managed work, read the packaged operational interface reference before relying on or updating current state. Use supported CLI tasks and the inspected opaque revision; skills do not use SQL or edit runtime storage. An isolated invocation keeps its requested scope. Installation alone does not adopt workflow policy.

## Resource map

- READ `references/operational-recording.md` when inspecting or recording Change-managed work.
- READ `references/targeted-recording-v2.schema.json` when constructing a recording request.
- READ `references/rigorloop-records-v4.schema.json` when checking the types used by that request.

- READ `references/boundary-first-method-v1.md` when the project applies its boundary first method v1 criteria to this invocation.

- READ `references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md` when the project applies its requirement to delivery model criteria to this invocation.

- READ `references/review-reliance.md` when the project applies its review reliance criteria to this invocation.

- READ `references/test-maintenance.md` when the project applies its test maintenance criteria to this invocation.

- READ `references/test-quality.md` when the project applies its test quality criteria to this invocation.

## Expected output

Report the actual scoped outcome, governing basis, changed subjects or recorded judgment, material gaps and the next authorized action. Distinguish progress, review approval, final verification and external publication; claim only outcomes supported by this invocation.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md17.6 KB
  • assets/verify-report-v3-skeleton.md3.1 KB
  • references/boundary-first-method-v1.md6.2 KB
  • references/branch-readiness-verification.md4.1 KB
  • references/evidence-applicability-v3.md2.6 KB
  • references/final-impact-analysis-v3.md2.3 KB
  • references/requirement-to-delivery-model.md2.7 KB
  • references/successful-explanation-v3.md1.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.