Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Wdi Daily Autopilot

ASecurity

Compose and launch the autonomous daily loop routine (default 10m interval) with self code-review and peer-review runners resolved from local configuration. Invoke as `/wdi-daily-autopilot [self-review] [peer] [interval] [--skip-peer-review|--no-review]` (`[self-review]` alias `[in-session]`).

4 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/23/2026
developmentshelltestingcode-reviewgit

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/24/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add wiradeltaid/wdi-method --skill wdi-daily-autopilot --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Wdi Daily Autopilot?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Wdi Daily Autopilot
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/wiradeltaid-wdi-daily-autopilot/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wiradeltaid-wdi-daily-autopilot)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: wdi-daily-autopilot
description: Compose and launch the autonomous daily loop routine (default 10m interval) with self code-review and peer-review runners resolved from local configuration. Invoke as `/wdi-daily-autopilot [self-review] [peer] [interval] [--skip-peer-review|--no-review]` (`[self-review]` alias `[in-session]`).
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# WDI Daily Autopilot Launch

Composes the autonomous daily engineering routine, verifies or initiates the owner-accepted mandate
required by `wdi-autopilot`, resolves coordinator self code-review and independent peer-review dispatch
from local configuration or agent rules, and launches the execution via `/loop <interval>` (default
`10m`).

`/wdi-daily-autopilot [self-review] [peer] [interval] [--skip-peer-review|--no-review]`:
- `[self-review]` — coordinator self code-review pass model (`default` or explicit model slug; alias `[in-session]`).
  `default` indicates the current coordinating session executes self code-review directly.
- `[peer]` — independent peer reviewer runner or model identifier.
- `[interval]` — optional loop interval matching `^\d+[smhd]$` (e.g., `5m`, `10m`, `15m`). Defaults
  to `10m` when omitted.
- `--skip-peer-review` / `--no-review` — bypasses the secondary peer review pass. MUST NOT disable
  coordinator self code-review, TDD cycles, or automated test suites, and is refused when any touched
  component has `risk_accepted: low` (§2 Guardrail).

## 0. Precondition

Confirm `.control/registry/index.yaml` exists in the repo root. If it does not, this is not a WDI
Method product repo — report that and stop.

## 1. Parse Arguments and Flags

Parse inputs unambiguously using these rules:
1. Check for review bypass flags: `--skip-peer-review` or `--no-review`. If present, mark peer review
   as bypassed.
2. Check for an interval token matching `^\d+[smhd]$`. If found, assign it to `<interval>`; otherwise
   default `<interval>` to `10m`.
3. For remaining positional arguments:
   - If 1 argument remains: assign to `<peer>`, and default `<self-review>` to `default`.
   - If 2 arguments remain: assign first to `<self-review>` and second to `<peer>`.
   - If 0 arguments remain: read defaults from `.control/custom-dispatch.yaml` if present, else default
     both to `default`.

## 2. Resolve Runner Configuration

Inspect the repository for `.control/custom-dispatch.yaml` (if not found in the current working directory and running inside a linked git worktree, resolve it from the main repository root via `(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/..`):
- **If `.control/custom-dispatch.yaml` exists**:
  Read `runners:`, `roles:`, and `review_policy:`.
  - If `review_policy.peer_review` is explicitly `false`, or if `roles.reviewer` is set to `none`, mark peer review as bypassed.
  - If `<peer>` was not explicitly specified on the command line, use `roles.reviewer`. If resolved `<peer>` is `none`,
    mark peer review as bypassed (coordinator self-review only).
  - If `roles.deep_analyst` is `none`, document review and architecture analysis are handled by the main reviewer or
    coordinator directly, without dispatching a separate deep analyst process.
  - `roles.builder` is fixed to `coordinator`: the coordinating session implements code directly inside the active run worktree (ensuring tight TDD cycles, direct verification, and eliminating delegation/handoff hallucinations). Coding delegation (whether `in-session` subagents or external builder runners) is prohibited in the daily routine.
    Guardrail: coordinator direct implementation MUST NOT eliminate independent peer review when any component the mandate touches has `risk_accepted: low`. There `low` is the hardest review: `wdi-build` Step 3 requires a two-reviewer panel of agents that are not the builder (`delivery-flow-guide.md`). The coordinator MUST NOT honour a peer-review bypass (`roles.reviewer: none`, `review_policy.peer_review: false`, `--skip-peer-review`, or `--no-review`) when any touched component has `risk_accepted: low`: stop and report which components block it (fail-closed). When every touched component is `medium` or `high`, the bypass is allowed, and the choice MUST be recorded in the mandate text (step 4) and in the ledger.
  - Resolve runner dispatch by `type:` for reviewer and deep analyst:
    - `auto`: Evaluates whether the runner's target model is reachable in-session from the active
      session profile (per the caller's global agent collaboration rules). Dispatches in-session via `Agent`
      if reachable; falls back to shell-out using `command` if unreachable in-session.
    - `in-session`: Dispatches strictly via in-session `Agent` subagent.
    - `shell-out`: Executes the external shell-out `command` (single-string command). If `command` is absent
      or empty, stop and report immediately (fail-closed).
- **If `.control/custom-dispatch.yaml` does not exist**:
  Resolve reviewer dispatch through the caller's active CLI environment.

## 3. Mandate Verification & Preflight Requirement

Per `wdi-autopilot` § Preflight, unattended loop iterations **require an active accepted mandate** in
`.control/registry/decisions.yaml` whose expiry date has not lapsed. A loop MUST NOT self-authorize
its own mandate.

1. Check if an active accepted mandate exists:
   - An active mandate MUST have BOTH `type: mandate` and `status: accepted` with an unexpired `expires:` date
     (`today <= expires`) and no `superseded_by:` or `status: superseded`.
   - **Primary lookup ($O(1)$):** Read `.control/generated/status.yaml` and inspect `mandates:`:
     - If `mandates.resolution: one`: the active mandate is `mandates.active_mandate.id` (with its verified `expires` and `status`). Proceed directly to step 3.
     - If `mandates.resolution: ambiguous`: stop and report immediately to the maintainer naming all `mandates.active_ids` (fail-closed; MUST NOT guess or choose between them).
     - If `mandates.resolution: none`: proceed to step 2 (Preflight).
   - **Fallback lookup (when `status.yaml` does not exist or lacks `mandates:`):**
     - MUST NOT run a broad search for `type:\s*mandate` across `decisions.yaml` (which matches dozens of historical
       `applied` mandates and overflows the tool output limit with hundreds of lines).
     - Query specifically for an active mandate entry using multiline search (e.g. `Grep` with
       `pattern: "type:\s*mandate[\s\S]{1,100}?status:\s*accepted|status:\s*accepted[\s\S]{1,100}?type:\s*mandate", multiline: true`).
       Once a candidate match is found, verify its individual decision block to confirm `expires:` is present,
       valid, and unexpired.
     - **Fail-closed on multiple active mandates:** If more than 1 active accepted mandate is found, stop and
       report immediately to the maintainer (fail-closed; MUST NOT guess or choose between them).
   - MUST NOT call `Read` on the entire 1000+ line `decisions.yaml` file. When reading the latest decision ID
     to determine the next candidate `DEC-` ID, read only the tail (e.g. the last 50-80 lines) of `decisions.yaml`.
2. **If no active accepted mandate exists:**
   - Execute `wdi-autopilot` Door 1 (Preflight) in this interactive turn.
   - When checking open work to include in the mandate, query `specs.yaml` selectively (e.g. `Grep` for
     `status:\s*(open|ready-for-dev)`) instead of reading all historical closed specs into context.
     Inspect the candidate spec's folder using the `spec_folder:` path from `specs.yaml` (MUST NOT run
     broad recursive searches on all of `.scratch/`).
   - Run validator preflight via `uv run .constitution/method/scripts/validate.py --check --baseline`
     (or `--generate --baseline`). If `.github/validate-baseline.txt` exists in the repo, the `--baseline` flag
     guarantees that accepted repository baseline findings are recognized as green.
   - When verifying the preflight test suite from `codebase-stack-guide.md`, run tests with quiet output flags
     if supported (e.g. `-- --quiet` or standard concise runner flags) to avoid flooding the context window
     with hundreds of verbose pass lines.
   - **Fail-closed on test failure:** If the test suite command exits non-zero, immediately surface the failure
     summary (the failing test names and error excerpt) and abort preflight; a mandate MUST NOT be opened on a
     failing test suite.
   - Present the one-page preflight summary and wait for the owner's explicit confirmation.
   - Once confirmed, write the accepted mandate row into `decisions.yaml` and initialize its ledger.
3. **If an active accepted mandate already exists:** Proceed directly to compose and launch the loop.

## 4. Compose the Routine Mandate

Fill the standing five-point routine template:

```markdown
Execute all FR/Tickets/Specs to completion under the active mandate:
1. Coding & Implementation: author code directly as coordinator in the active worktree. No coding delegation — coordinator alone implements application and test changes following TDD red-to-green cycles. Boundary: coordinator edits application and test files only during ticket coding, and defers commits to step 5. Builder MUST NOT commit, push, merge, alter git branches, or write to .control/registry/ or .control/memlog/.
2. Code review: perform code review — self code-review by coordinator, and peer review: <resolved peer command | "none due to config">.
3. Testing & Verification: coordinator alone runs the authoritative test suite (from codebase-stack-guide.md) directly on the active worktree after the coding pass and verifies red-to-green evidence before staging or committing.
4. Reviews and peer analysis: delegate document and architecture review to <resolved peer command | "coordinator self-review (peer review: none due to config)"> — follow wdi-review criteria for any touched architecture or spec documents.
5. Worktree isolation & Integration: coordinator alone isolates ticket implementation into the run worktree, writes ledger decisions in .control/memlog/, stages/commits, and merges per wdi-autopilot. Peer review: <"peer reviewer inspects worktree without interfering with active build processes" | "none due to config">.
```

If peer review was bypassed (via `roles.reviewer: none`, `review_policy.peer_review: false`, or `--skip-peer-review`),
explicitly record `peer review: none due to config` in items 2, 4, and 5, instructing the coordinator to perform direct
self-review and self-verification without external peer dispatch.

## 5. Launch

Invoke the `loop` skill with `<resolved interval> /wdi-autopilot <composed text from step 4>`. This
starts the loop execution.

## 6. Verify Immediate Execution

Before finishing, verify that `/wdi-autopilot` was invoked in this same turn for the first iteration
rather than remaining idle until the first cron interval tick. If it did not run immediately, invoke
`/wdi-autopilot` now to start the first iteration.

## 7. Report and Stop

Report the resolved configuration (in-session mechanism, peer review status, active mandate ID, and
loop interval), confirm that the loop is active, and stop. MUST NOT intervene in or micromanage
subsequent loop iterations.

Attribution

wiradeltaidwiradeltaid
View sourceMore from wiradeltaid →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Browser Extension Developer

Use this skill when developing or maintaining browser extension code in the `browser/` directory, including Chrome/Firefox/Edge compatibility, content scripts, background scripts, or i18n updates.

284722 votes

Seo Optimizer

SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.

2192 votes

Google Official Seo Guide

Official Google SEO guide covering search optimization, best practices, Search Console, crawling, indexing, and improving website search visibility based on official Google documentation

1862 votes

Tanstack Start

Build a full-stack TanStack Start app on Cloudflare Workers from scratch — SSR, file-based routing, server functions, D1+Drizzle, better-auth, Tailwind v4+shadcn/ui. Use whenever the user mentions TanStack Start, asks to scaffold a full-stack Cloudflare app with SSR, wants an SSR dashboard, or asks for a React 19 + Cloudflare Workers app with file-based routing and server functions — even if they don't name TanStack Start specifically. No template repo — Claude generates every file fresh per ...

9881 votes

Pentest

PTES-aligned adversarial security audit for backend, frontend, and mobile applications. Produces a CVSS-scored Hacker Report with verified PoCs and phased remediation.

5491 votes
View all in development →