从基于教学评一致性原则的专业教案写作(新课标/个性化教案/教学计划)与教师工具箱(教案设计/评分标准Rubric/课堂活动/评估设计)、课程目标驱动的教案生成(互动题/作业/分层教学建议)与课程模块结构规划(单元目标/作业设计/里程碑),到教师备课自动化(资料搜索/课文分析/生字词/教学设计)与教案内容PPT转化(讲师活动提取/幻灯片备注/一键更新)的完整教案设计工作流。覆盖教案撰写、工具辅助、分层设计、模块规划、备课自动化、PPT转化全链路。
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add whyzsm/tiny-agents --skill education-lesson-planning-team --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Education Lesson Planning Team?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/whyzsm-education-lesson-planning-team)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: education-lesson-planning-team
description: 从基于教学评一致性原则的专业教案写作(新课标/个性化教案/教学计划)与教师工具箱(教案设计/评分标准Rubric/课堂活动/评估设计)、课程目标驱动的教案生成(互动题/作业/分层教学建议)与课程模块结构规划(单元目标/作业设计/里程碑),到教师备课自动化(资料搜索/课文分析/生字词/教学设计)与教案内容PPT转化(讲师活动提取/幻灯片备注/一键更新)的完整教案设计工作流。覆盖教案撰写、工具辅助、分层设计、模块规划、备课自动化、PPT转化全链路。
---
# 教案设计
Use this skill as the routing entry point for the 教案设计 workflow. It coordinates the companion skills in this bundle instead of replacing them.
## Workflow
1. Read `references/guide.md` to classify the user request, required inputs, and expected deliverables.
2. Choose the smallest relevant companion skill set. For full-package requests, run the guide steps in order.
3. Preserve user-provided facts and mark assumptions explicitly. Ask only for missing inputs that block the next useful step.
4. Return concrete artifacts named by the guide, plus open questions, risks, and verification notes where relevant.
## Companion Skills
- `$teaching-plan-writer`
- `$teacher-assistant`
- `$classroom-lesson-pack`
- `$creator-course-outline`
- `$teacher-prep`
- `$ppt-lecture-notes`
## Output
Produce only the deliverables relevant to the matched workflow. For full-package requests, assemble the final output package described in `references/guide.md`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie
Onboard 1-node GitHub MR functional tests for GB200 from existing mr-scoped 2-node tests.
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
This skill should be used when the user asks for a Seedance 2.0 template, genre recipe, product ad, lifestyle video, drama scene, music video, landscape shot, commercial, animation scene, or reusable production pattern.
Problem-solving strategies for root finding in numerical methods