Structured prompt template for recovering the instruction that transformed one text into another, with labeled original/rewritten fields and explicit task framing
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add wenmin-wu/ds-skills --skill inverse-task-prompt-template --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Inverse Task Prompt Template?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wenmin-wu-inverse-task-prompt-template)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: llm-inverse-task-prompt-template
description: Structured prompt template for recovering the instruction that transformed one text into another, with labeled original/rewritten fields and explicit task framing
---
# Inverse Task Prompt Template
## Overview
To recover an unknown prompt from an (original, rewritten) text pair, frame the task explicitly: show the LLM both texts with clear labels, state that one was derived from the other via a prompt, and ask it to infer that prompt. The template structure — labeled fields, task description, output format constraint — is critical for consistent results across different LLMs.
## Quick Start
```python
TEMPLATE = """Below, the `Original Text` has been rewritten into `Rewritten Text`
by an LLM with a certain prompt/instruction. Analyze the differences
and infer the specific prompt that was used.
Original Text:
{original_text}
Rewritten Text:
{rewritten_text}
The prompt was:"""
def build_recovery_prompt(original, rewritten):
return TEMPLATE.format(
original_text=original[:1000],
rewritten_text=rewritten[:1000])
prompt = build_recovery_prompt(row['original_text'], row['rewritten_text'])
output = model.generate(tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors='pt').to(device),
max_new_tokens=50, do_sample=False)
recovered = tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
recovered = recovered.split("The prompt was:")[-1].strip()
```
## Workflow
1. Label both texts clearly (`Original Text:`, `Rewritten Text:`)
2. State the task: one was derived from the other via an LLM prompt
3. Ask the model to analyze differences (style, tone, structure, content)
4. End with a response anchor (`The prompt was:`) to constrain output format
5. Parse only the text after the anchor
## Key Decisions
- **Response anchor**: ending with `The prompt was:` forces concise output without preamble
- **Truncation**: limit input texts to 300-1000 words to fit context window
- **do_sample=False**: greedy decoding for deterministic, focused outputs
- **Model choice**: instruction-tuned models (7B-IT, Mistral-Instruct) follow the template better
## References
- [Prompt Recovery with Gemma - KerasNLP Starter](https://www.kaggle.com/code/awsaf49/prompt-recovery-with-gemma-kerasnlp-starter)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!