Detects project languages and monorepo state, runs language-appropriate static analysis (dependency graph, complexity, duplication, semantic patterns), and produces a refactor map ranking hotspots. Use when user invokes /aref or explicitly asks to analyze a codebase for refactoring.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add wayne930242/Reflexive-Claude-Code --skill analyzing-codebases --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Analyzing Codebases?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wayne930242-analyzing-codebases)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: analyzing-codebases
description: Detects project languages and monorepo state, runs language-appropriate static analysis (dependency graph, complexity, duplication, semantic patterns), and produces a refactor map ranking hotspots. Use when user invokes /aref or explicitly asks to analyze a codebase for refactoring.
---
# Analyzing Codebases
## Overview
**Analyzing codebases IS producing a hotspot-ranked refactor map before any restructuring begins.**
Run the language-specific toolchain, aggregate results into a single map covering dependency graph, complexity hotspots, duplication, cyclic dependencies, and AGENTS.md gaps. The map is the input to `planning-refactors`; without it, planning is guesswork.
**Core principle:** Measure before touching code.
## Routing
**Pattern:** Chain
**Handoff:** user-confirmation
**Next:** `planning-refactors`
## Task Initialization (MANDATORY)
Before ANY action, create task list using TaskCreate:
- Subject: `[analyzing-codebases] Task N: <action>`
**Tasks:**
1. Detect languages and monorepo state
2. Determine refactor scope (whole repo vs subproject)
3. Check required toolchain availability
4. Run toolchain and collect raw outputs
5. Compute hotspot ranking (churn × complexity)
6. Assemble refactor map
7. Present map and await user approval
## Task 1: Detect languages
Scan CWD for manifest files. Each manifest maps to a language:
- `package.json` → TypeScript/JavaScript
- `pyproject.toml` or `setup.py` → Python
- `Cargo.toml` → Rust
- `go.mod` → Go
Record detected languages in memory. No manifest → generic fallback.
## Task 2: Determine scope
Check for monorepo markers:
- `pnpm-workspace.yaml`, `lerna.json`, `nx.json`, `turbo.json` → JS monorepo
- Cargo `[workspace]` in root `Cargo.toml` → Rust workspace
- Multiple `go.mod` files → Go multi-module
- Multiple `pyproject.toml` in subdirs → Python workspace
Monorepo → ask user: whole repo, specific subproject(s), or root only.
Single project → scope is CWD.
## Task 3: Check toolchain
For each detected language, load the corresponding reference in `references/`. Check each tool with `which <tool>` or language-specific equivalent.
Missing tools → print install command from the reference; ask user to install-then-continue or skip that analysis class.
## Task 4: Run toolchain
Execute the tools per reference instructions. Save raw outputs to `.rcc/aref-raw/{ts}-{lang}-{tool}.<ext>` where `<ext>` matches each tool's native output format (see Output Locations in each reference doc — `.json`, `.csv`, `.txt`, `.dot` etc.). `{ts}` = `YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS`, fixed for the run.
## Task 5: Compute hotspots
Hotspot score = git log churn × cognitive complexity. Churn: `git log --format=format: --name-only --since="6 months ago" | grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn`. Complexity from toolchain output.
Rank top 20 files by score.
## Task 6: Assemble refactor map
Write `.rcc/{ts}-refactor-map.md` per schema in `references/refactor-map-schema.md`.
## Task 7: Present to user
Print summary: detected languages, scope, top 5 hotspots, count of cyclic deps, AGENTS.md status. Ask user: `approve plan handoff` / `adjust scope` / `abort`.
Approved → hand off to `planning-refactors`.
## Red Flags - STOP
- "Skip toolchain, read code directly"
- "Compute hotspots from file size only"
- "Skip churn (no git history)"
- "Produce plan before map"
- "Scope = whole repo" on a monorepo without asking
## Common Rationalizations
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "I can eyeball the hotspots" | Hotspots = churn × complexity. Both must be measured. |
| "Tool missing, skip silently" | Ask user. Silent skip produces incomplete map. |
| "Map too long, summarize aggressively" | Map is machine input for planning. Completeness beats brevity. |
| "Use LOC as complexity proxy" | LOC correlates weakly. Use cognitive complexity. |
| "Run on uncommitted changes" | Churn = git history. Dirty tree skews count. |
## References
- `references/typescript-toolchain.md`
- `references/python-toolchain.md`
- `references/rust-toolchain.md`
- `references/go-toolchain.md`
- `references/generic-fallback.md`
- `references/refactor-map-schema.md`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!