Creates a role-specific onboarding plan from a project's existing knowledge artifacts, without writing anything. Use when the user wants a ramp-up plan for a specific role, e.g. "onboard me as a frontend developer for this project", "what should a new QA hire read first here".
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vivantel/kms --skill onboard --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Onboard?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vivantel-onboard)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: onboard
description: Creates a role-specific onboarding plan from a project's existing knowledge artifacts, without writing anything. Use when the user wants a ramp-up plan for a specific role, e.g. "onboard me as a frontend developer for this project", "what should a new QA hire read first here".
---
Read `docs/{facts,decisions,guardrails,skills}/` and produce a 5-day, role-tailored onboarding plan — without writing to disk.
## Before producing a plan
1. Ask for the role if not given — it shapes everything else, don't guess it.
2. Read each type's `INDEX.md` first, if present, to identify what's relevant to the role — ignore any `(umbrella)`-marked tag when matching (same exclusion `lint` check 16 applies). Read all four artifact directories directly when no index exists, or when the index-narrowed set looks thin for a role this broad (same staleness caveat `query` applies). If `docs/skills/{product,process}-track-roles.md` exists and lists the given role, weigh its stated scope; otherwise use judgment about what the role would need.
3. **Warn if critical artifacts are missing** before producing the plan — most importantly, no facts at all, but also an empty `decisions/` or `guardrails/` if the project claims to use this system. Say plainly the plan is built on an incomplete base; don't let it read as if the knowledge base were complete when it isn't.
4. No knowledge base at all? Say so and stop — recommend `bootstrap`, don't improvise a plan from nothing.
## Producing the plan
5 days, each stating:
- **Goal** — what the person should understand or do by end of day, specific to the role.
- **Read** — links to the specific artifacts for that day and role (`docs/decisions/000X-....md`, not "the decisions folder").
- **Run** — which of this plugin's skills to try and why.
A reasonable shape (adjust to what actually exists for this role — don't force artifacts onto a day that doesn't need them):
1. Orient — highest-level facts and most consequential decisions.
2. Role-specific decisions and guardrails — what this role must not violate and why.
3. Role-specific facts and current state.
4. First real task, using `query` to resolve anything unclear from days 1-3.
5. Practice a decision end-to-end with `clarify`, run `capture` afterward if they touched anything.
Tailor content, not just headings — two roles should get visibly different reading lists and goals, not the same plan with the role name swapped in.
## Out of scope
Writing or editing any artifact (read-only, like `query`), and generating the underlying facts/decisions/guardrails if they don't exist yet — that's `bootstrap`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!