"Route SDV quality, diagnostic, and visualization workflows for
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VectorSpaceLab/AREX-Skill --skill evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evaluation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vectorspacelab-evaluation-7bbf82d2)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evaluation
description: "Route SDV quality, diagnostic, and visualization workflows for
real versus synthetic data."
disable-model-invocation: true
metadata:
disco-role: operating
license: NOASSERTION
---
# SDV evaluation router
Use this sub-skill when the task is to score synthetic data quality, run diagnostic checks, or build real-vs-synthetic plots after SDV sampling. It owns the SDV evaluation functions and their interaction with `sdmetrics` report/visualization objects.
## Route here for
- Natural requests such as "evaluate SDV synthetic data", "quality report", "diagnostic report", `evaluate_quality`, `run_diagnostic`, `get_column_plot`, `get_column_pair_plot`, or `get_cardinality_plot`.
- Single-table `DataFrame` evaluation and multi-table `dict[str, DataFrame]` evaluation through the unified `sdv.evaluation` functions.
- Plot selection for one column, two columns, and multi-table relationship cardinality.
- Interpreting report scores/properties and debugging type, metadata, column, table, or sdtype errors in evaluation calls.
## Route elsewhere
- Loading data or constructing metadata: use the data-preparation sub-skill.
- Fitting or sampling data with SDV models: use single-table, multi-table, or sequential sub-skills.
- Constraint validation and constraint-specific failures: use the constraints sub-skill.
- Metadata graph visualization, not synthetic-vs-real comparison: use data-preparation.
## Operating path
1. Confirm `real_data` and `synthetic_data` use the same data shape: both pandas DataFrames for single-table workflows or both dictionaries for multi-table workflows.
2. Confirm metadata is valid and describes the real/synthetic data columns. If not, route to data-preparation before scoring.
3. Use `evaluate_quality` for distribution/trend similarity and `run_diagnostic` for data-validity/data-structure checks.
4. Use plot helpers only after confirming the target table/column names and sdtypes are supported, or provide an explicit `plot_type`.
5. Treat report scores as diagnostic evidence, not proof that the synthetic data is safe or private. Capture the result object and inspect its properties/details when the task needs explanations.
## References
- [API reference](references/api-reference.md) for function signatures, accepted data shapes, and return objects.
- [Workflows](references/workflows.md) for single-table, multi-table, and plot recipes.
- [Troubleshooting](references/troubleshooting.md) for common report and visualization failures.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!