Analyze code systematically: clone repos, inspect JARs, search documentation, reverse-engineer binaries. Triggers: analyzing unknown codebases, finding API endpoints, understanding compiled code, security auditing.
Scanned 9/20/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add tstapler/dotfiles --skill code-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Code Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tstapler-code-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: code-analysis
description: "Analyze code systematically: clone repos, inspect JARs, search documentation, reverse-engineer binaries. Triggers: analyzing unknown codebases, finding API endpoints, understanding compiled code, security auditing."
---
# Code Analysis Skill
Systematic code analysis using progressive discovery: from source to binary, from documentation to reverse engineering.
## Analysis Workflow
### Phase 1: Source Discovery
```json
{
"actions": [
{"tool": "git", "action": "clone to /tmp/analysis-*", "depth": 1},
{"tool": "find", "action": "identify project type", "indicators": ["pom.xml", "package.json", "Cargo.toml"]},
{"tool": "grep", "action": "scan for patterns", "patterns": ["API", "endpoint", "route", "handler"]}
],
"output": "project-summary.json"
}
```
### Phase 2: Dependency Analysis
```json
{
"java": {"tool": "jar-inspector.py", "targets": ["*.jar", "lib/*"], "extract": ["manifest", "classes", "resources"]},
"python": {"tool": "pip", "action": "download --no-deps", "analyze": ["setup.py", "requirements.txt"]},
"javascript": {"tool": "npm", "action": "list --json", "depth": 2},
"binary": {"tool": "ldd/otool", "action": "list dependencies"}
}
```
### Phase 3: Documentation Search
```json
{
"strategies": [
{"source": "web", "query": "[project] API documentation site:github.io"},
{"source": "repo", "paths": ["docs/", "*.md", "examples/"]},
{"source": "code", "patterns": ["@api", "@route", "swagger", "openapi"]}
]
}
```
### Phase 4: Reverse Engineering (if needed)
```json
{
"binary_analysis": {
"strings": {"min_length": 8, "encoding": ["ascii", "utf-16"]},
"symbols": {"demangle": true, "filter": "public"},
"disassembly": {"tool": "objdump", "sections": [".text", ".rodata"]}
},
"java_decompilation": {
"tool": "cfr/procyon",
"output": "decompiled/",
"options": ["--comments", "--recover-type-hints"]
}
}
```
## Tool Selection Matrix
| Scenario | Primary Tool | Fallback | Output Format |
|----------|-------------|----------|---------------|
| Git repo available | `git clone --depth=1` | Download ZIP | Local directory |
| JAR file | `jar-inspector.py` | `jar tf` | Class listing |
| Binary executable | `binary-analyzer.sh` | `strings + file` | Analysis report |
| No source access | Web search | Reverse engineering | Documentation links |
| API discovery | `grep -r "route\\|endpoint"` | AST parsing | Endpoint list |
## Security Checklist
**MANDATORY for all operations:**
- [ ] Use temp directory: `/tmp/analysis-$(uuidgen)`
- [ ] Validate URLs/paths: No `..` or absolute paths outside /tmp
- [ ] Set resource limits: `timeout 60s`, max 100MB downloads
- [ ] Never execute: Only static analysis
- [ ] Clean up: `trap 'rm -rf /tmp/analysis-*' EXIT`
## Output Formats
### Project Summary
```json
{
"project": "name",
"type": "java|python|javascript|binary",
"structure": {
"main_files": [],
"dependencies": [],
"entry_points": []
},
"apis": [
{"path": "/api/v1/users", "method": "GET", "file": "UserController.java:42"}
],
"security_notes": []
}
```
### Binary Analysis Report
```json
{
"file": "binary_name",
"type": "ELF|PE|Mach-O",
"architecture": "x86_64",
"symbols": ["exported_functions"],
"strings": ["interesting_strings"],
"dependencies": ["libname.so.1"],
"entry_point": "0x1000"
}
```
## Script Integration
### Safe Clone
```bash
# scripts/safe-clone.sh
#!/bin/bash
TEMP_DIR="/tmp/analysis-$(uuidgen)"
mkdir -p "$TEMP_DIR"
cd "$TEMP_DIR"
timeout 60s git clone --depth=1 "$1" repo 2>&1
echo "$TEMP_DIR/repo"
```
### JAR Inspector
```python
# scripts/jar-inspector.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import zipfile, json, sys
jar = zipfile.ZipFile(sys.argv[1])
classes = [f for f in jar.namelist() if f.endswith('.class')]
manifest = jar.read('META-INF/MANIFEST.MF').decode('utf-8', errors='ignore') if 'META-INF/MANIFEST.MF' in jar.namelist() else ''
print(json.dumps({'classes': classes[:100], 'manifest': manifest[:1000]}))
```
## Language-Specific Strategies
**Load additional context when needed:**
- Java projects → Load `java-analysis.md`
- Binary files → Load `binary-analysis.md`
- Web API discovery → Load `web-discovery.md`
## Best Practices
1. **Progressive Discovery**: Start simple (clone, grep), escalate to complex (decompile, RE)
2. **Cache Results**: Store analysis in structured JSON for reuse
3. **Fail Gracefully**: If one method fails, try alternatives
4. **Document Findings**: Create markdown summary with code snippets
5. **Respect Limits**: Don't analyze files >100MB or repos >1GB
## Common Patterns
### Finding API Endpoints
```bash
# Quick scan for common patterns
grep -r "route\|endpoint\|api\|REST" --include="*.java" --include="*.py" --include="*.js"
# Java Spring
grep -r "@RequestMapping\|@GetMapping\|@PostMapping"
# Python Flask/FastAPI
grep -r "@app.route\|@router"
# Node.js Express
grep -r "app.get\|app.post\|router.get"
```
### Analyzing JARs
```bash
# Download and inspect
curl -L -o app.jar "https://example.com/app.jar"
python3 scripts/jar-inspector.py app.jar > jar-analysis.json
# Find specific classes
jar tf app.jar | grep -i controller
```
### Binary Inspection
```bash
# Basic analysis
file binary_name
strings -n 10 binary_name | head -100
nm -D binary_name | grep -i api
# Advanced with script
./scripts/binary-analyzer.sh binary_name > analysis.json
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Resolution |
|-------|------------|
| Git clone fails | Try --depth=1, then ZIP download |
| JAR corrupted | Use `jar tf` for basic listing |
| Binary stripped | Focus on strings and imports |
| No documentation | Aggressive code search + RE |
| Rate limited | Add delays, use cached results |
## Metrics
Track analysis effectiveness:
- Time to first insight: <30 seconds
- API coverage: >80% of endpoints found
- False positive rate: <10%
- Resource usage: <100MB disk, <1GB RAMIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!