Skip to content
Back to skills

417 Architecture Report 0da5d0cb

ASecurity

Generate comprehensive architecture reports using five parallel agents for inventory, integration, decision, risk, and financial analysis

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
securitygodatabasesecuritydocumentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 417-architecture-report_0da5d0cb --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 417 Architecture Report 0da5d0cb?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 417 Architecture Report 0da5d0cb
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-417-architecture-report-0da5d0cb/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-417-architecture-report-0da5d0cb)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
description: Generate comprehensive architecture reports using five parallel agents for inventory, integration, decision, risk, and financial analysis
model: sonnet
---

# /architecture-report

Generate comprehensive architecture reports for stakeholder communication, audits, and governance reviews. Uses five parallel agents to gather and analyse system inventory, integrations, decisions, risks, and costs simultaneously.

## When to Use This Skill

- Preparing for architecture governance reviews
- Creating quarterly or annual architecture reports
- Documenting the current state of a system landscape
- Onboarding new architects or technical leads
- Supporting audit and compliance activities

## Usage

```
/architecture-report <scope> [--audience exec|technical|audit] [--format summary|detailed]
```

### Parameters

| Parameter    | Description                                          | Required |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| `scope`      | What to report on (system, programme, or domain)     | Yes      |
| `--audience` | Target audience — adjusts detail level (default: `technical`) | No |
| `--format`   | Report depth (default: `detailed`)                   | No       |

## Instructions

### Phase 1: Define Report Scope

Gather from the user:

| Field           | Description                                      | Example                              |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Scope**       | What systems/domain to cover                     | Order Management domain              |
| **Time period** | Report period                                    | Q4 2025                              |
| **Audience**    | Who will read this report?                       | Architecture review board            |
| **Focus areas** | Any specific areas of concern?                   | Integration complexity, tech debt    |
| **Source files** | Where to find system/architecture documentation | System notes, ADRs, project files    |

### Phase 2: Parallel Data Gathering — Agent Team

Launch five agents simultaneously using the Task tool.

**Agent 1: System Inventory Analyst** (Haiku)
Task: Catalogue all systems in scope
- List all systems with name, type, technology stack, and owner
- Identify system criticality (critical/high/medium/low)
- Map deployment topology (cloud, on-premises, hybrid)
- Note system age and last major update date
- Flag systems approaching end-of-life or end-of-support
Return: System inventory table with technology, owner, criticality, and status

**Agent 2: Integration Mapper** (Haiku)
Task: Map system-to-system connections
- Catalogue all integration points between systems
- Record protocol (REST, SOAP, messaging, file transfer, database link)
- Record pattern (synchronous, asynchronous, batch, event-driven)
- Identify data flows and their direction
- Flag single points of failure in integrations
- Note integration health (stable, fragile, deprecated)
Return: Integration matrix and dependency data for diagram generation

**Agent 3: Decision Tracker** (Haiku)
Task: Summarise architecture decisions
- Find all architecture decisions (ADRs) related to the scope
- Categorise by status (proposed, accepted, deprecated, superseded)
- Identify decisions that are overdue for review
- Map decisions to the systems and projects they affect
- Highlight recently accepted decisions and their implications
Return: ADR summary table with status, age, and review dates

**Agent 4: Risk and Compliance Analyst** (Sonnet)
Task: Assess security, compliance, and technical risk
- Evaluate security posture per system (authentication, encryption, vulnerability management)
- Check compliance status against relevant standards (ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, etc.)
- Identify technical debt (outdated dependencies, unsupported versions, workarounds)
- Score architecture maturity per system (ad-hoc, managed, optimised)
- Compile risk register with probability and impact scores
Return: Risk register and compliance matrix with maturity scores

**Agent 5: Financial Analyst** (Sonnet)
Task: Analyse architecture costs
- Calculate cost per system (infrastructure, licensing, staffing)
- Identify cost trends (increasing, stable, decreasing)
- Flag cost optimisation opportunities (rightsizing, consolidation, licence renegotiation)
- Calculate total architecture TCO for the scope
- Compare costs against industry benchmarks where possible
Return: Financial summary with per-system cost breakdown and optimisation opportunities

### Phase 3: Synthesise Report

Combine all agent results, tailored to the target audience:

**Executive audience:** Focus on risk, cost, and strategic alignment. Minimise technical detail.
**Technical audience:** Full detail on systems, integrations, and decisions.
**Audit audience:** Emphasise compliance, controls, and evidence.

## Output Format

```markdown
# Architecture Report: <Scope>

**Period:** <Time period>
**Prepared for:** <Audience>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## Executive Summary

<1-2 page overview with key metrics, risks, and recommendations>

### Key Metrics

| Metric                    | Value          | Trend      |
|---------------------------|----------------|------------|
| Systems in scope          | X              | —          |
| Integration points        | X              | +X vs last |
| Active ADRs               | X              | —          |
| Open risks (high+)        | X              | -X vs last |
| Total architecture TCO    | £Xk/month      | +X%        |

## System Landscape

### System Inventory

| System          | Type      | Technology    | Criticality | Owner        | Status      |
|-----------------|-----------|---------------|-------------|--------------|-------------|
| <System Name>   | <type>    | <tech stack>  | Critical    | <Team>       | Active      |

### Integration Map

| Source          | Target          | Protocol | Pattern       | Health    |
|-----------------|-----------------|----------|---------------|-----------|
| <System A>      | <System B>      | REST     | Synchronous   | Stable    |

## Architecture Decisions

| ADR              | Status   | Date       | Systems Affected    | Review Due |
|------------------|----------|------------|---------------------|------------|
| <ADR Title>      | Accepted | YYYY-MM-DD | System A, System B  | YYYY-MM-DD |

### Decisions Requiring Attention
<ADRs overdue for review or with changed context>

## Security and Compliance

### Compliance Matrix

| Standard    | System A | System B | System C |
|-------------|----------|----------|----------|
| ISO 27001   | Pass     | Partial  | N/A      |
| GDPR        | Pass     | Pass     | Fail     |

### Risk Register

| Risk                    | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation         |
|-------------------------|-------------|--------|-------|---------------------|
| <Risk description>      | X/5         | X/5    | X/25  | <Mitigation>        |

## Financial Analysis

### Cost by System

| System          | Infrastructure | Licensing | Staffing | Total/Month |
|-----------------|----------------|-----------|----------|-------------|
| <System Name>   | £X             | £X        | £X       | £X          |

### Optimisation Opportunities

| Opportunity              | Est. Savings | Effort | Priority |
|--------------------------|-------------|--------|----------|
| <Description>            | £X/year     | Medium | High     |

## Recommendations

1. **Priority 1:** <recommendation with rationale>
2. **Priority 2:** <recommendation with rationale>
3. **Priority 3:** <recommendation with rationale>

## Appendices

### A: System Dependency Diagram
<Mermaid or PlantUML diagram>

### B: Full Risk Register
<Expanded risk details>
```

## Examples

### Example 1: Domain Architecture Report

```
/architecture-report "Order Management domain" --audience exec --format summary
```

Generates an executive summary of the order management architecture with cost highlights and top risks.

### Example 2: Full Technical Report

```
/architecture-report "Payment Processing" --audience technical --format detailed
```

Full technical report with system details, integration maps, and all ADRs.

### Example 3: Audit Report

```
/architecture-report "Customer Data Platform" --audience audit
```

Compliance-focused report with control evidence, data residency, and audit trail coverage.

---

**Invoke with:** `/architecture-report <scope>` to generate a comprehensive architecture report

Files in this skill

  • README.md1.1 KB
  • skill.md8.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.