Back to skills
SKILL.md
2414 Fastembed Improvement Plan 6434df52
ASecurityBased on deep evaluation: - **FastEmbed 30-44% faster** on long queries (excellent) - **Rule-based 67% domain accuracy** vs FastEmbed 58% - **FastEmbed misses**: conversation, finance (as "general") - **Both miss**: factual, reasoning domains
- 9 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 0 views
- Added October 11, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 2414-fastembed-improvement-plan_6434df52 --agent claude-codeAre you the author of 2414 Fastembed Improvement Plan 6434df52?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-2414-fastembed-improvement-plan-6434df52)# FastEmbed Implementation Improvement Plan
## Current State Analysis
Based on deep evaluation:
- **FastEmbed 30-44% faster** on long queries (excellent)
- **Rule-based 67% domain accuracy** vs FastEmbed 58%
- **FastEmbed misses**: conversation, finance (as "general")
- **Both miss**: factual, reasoning domains
## Root Causes
1. **DOMAIN_EXEMPLARS incomplete** - finance, conversation, factual, reasoning lack good exemplars
2. **Hybrid mode not enabled by default** - could combine best of both
3. **Confidence threshold too high** (0.6) - some domains need lower thresholds
4. **No complexity-aware domain detection** - complexity should influence domain routing
## Improvement Opportunities
### 1. Enhanced Domain Exemplars (HIGH IMPACT)
Add more exemplars for weak domains:
```python
DOMAIN_EXEMPLARS = {
# ... existing ...
Domain.FINANCIAL: [
"Explain compound interest", # ADD
"Calculate ROI on investment", # ADD
"What are the tax implications", # ADD
"Portfolio diversification strategy", # ADD
"Explain P/E ratio", # ADD
],
Domain.CONVERSATION: [
"How are you today?", # ADD
"Nice to meet you", # ADD
"Let's chat about", # ADD
"What do you think?", # ADD
"Tell me more", # ADD
],
Domain.FACTUAL: [
"What is the capital of France?", # ADD
"When did World War II end?", # ADD
"Who invented the telephone?", # ADD
"What is the population of", # ADD
"Is it true that", # ADD
],
Domain.REASONING: [ # NEW DOMAIN OR MAP TO GENERAL
"If A then B, what about C?",
"Compare and contrast",
"What are the implications of",
"Logical deduction",
"Syllogism",
],
}
```
### 2. Smart Hybrid Mode (MEDIUM IMPACT)
Enable hybrid by default with smart combination:
```python
class SmartDomainDetector:
"""
Combines rule-based and semantic detection optimally.
Strategy:
- Rule-based first (fast, good for clear keywords)
- If rule confidence < 0.7, use semantic for second opinion
- If they agree, boost confidence
- If they disagree, prefer semantic for nuanced queries
"""
def detect(self, query: str) -> tuple[Domain, float]:
# Fast rule-based first
rule_domain, rule_conf = self.rule_detector.detect(query)
# If high confidence, trust rule-based (saves latency)
if rule_conf >= 0.85:
return rule_domain, rule_conf
# For uncertain cases, consult semantic
if self.semantic_available:
sem_domain, sem_conf = self.semantic_detector.detect(query)
# Agreement boosts confidence
if rule_domain == sem_domain:
return rule_domain, min(0.95, rule_conf + 0.15)
# Disagreement - prefer higher confidence
if sem_conf > rule_conf:
return sem_domain, sem_conf
return rule_domain, rule_conf
```
### 3. Domain-Specific Confidence Thresholds (MEDIUM IMPACT)
```python
DOMAIN_THRESHOLDS = {
Domain.CODE: 0.65, # Code is distinctive
Domain.MEDICAL: 0.70, # Need high confidence for medical
Domain.LEGAL: 0.70, # Need high confidence for legal
Domain.CONVERSATION: 0.50, # Lower threshold (often missed)
Domain.FINANCIAL: 0.55, # Lower threshold (often missed)
Domain.FACTUAL: 0.50, # Lower threshold (often missed)
Domain.GENERAL: 0.40, # Fallback domain
}
```
### 4. Add FastEmbed to Complexity Detection (HIGH IMPACT)
Currently complexity uses rule-based only. Add semantic layer:
```python
# In complexity.py
class SemanticComplexityBooster:
"""
Use embeddings to detect complex query patterns.
Embeddings for complexity exemplars:
- "Prove X is true" -> expert
- "Implement production-ready" -> hard
- "What is X?" -> simple
"""
COMPLEXITY_EXEMPLARS = {
"expert": [
"Prove mathematically that",
"Derive from first principles",
"Design a distributed system",
"Implement a lock-free algorithm",
],
"hard": [
"Explain the implications of",
"Implement with error handling",
"Compare trade-offs between",
],
"moderate": [
"Explain how X works",
"Compare X and Y",
"What are the advantages of",
],
"simple": [
"What is X?",
"Define X",
"List examples of",
],
"trivial": [
"Hi",
"Hello",
"What is 2+2?",
],
}
```
### 5. Quality Validation Enhancement (LOW IMPACT)
Use FastEmbed for query-response alignment:
```python
class SemanticAlignmentChecker:
"""
Check if response semantically aligns with query.
Uses cosine similarity between query and response embeddings.
Low similarity = potential off-topic response.
"""
def check_alignment(self, query: str, response: str) -> float:
q_emb = self.embedder.embed(query)
r_emb = self.embedder.embed(response)
return cosine_similarity(q_emb, r_emb)
```
## Implementation Priority
| Priority | Task | Impact | Effort |
|----------|------|--------|--------|
| P0 | Add domain exemplars | HIGH | LOW |
| P0 | Enable hybrid mode by default | HIGH | LOW |
| P1 | Domain-specific thresholds | MEDIUM | LOW |
| P1 | SemanticComplexityBooster | HIGH | MEDIUM |
| P2 | SemanticAlignmentChecker | LOW | MEDIUM |
## Files to Modify
1. `cascadeflow/routing/domain.py`
- Add DOMAIN_EXEMPLARS for finance, conversation, factual
- Update SemanticDomainDetector with domain-specific thresholds
- Enable hybrid mode by default
2. `cascadeflow/quality/complexity.py`
- Add SemanticComplexityBooster class
- Integrate with existing detect() method
3. `cascadeflow/quality/quality.py`
- Add SemanticAlignmentChecker (optional)
4. `tests/test_domain_detection.py`
- Add tests for new exemplars
- Add tests for hybrid mode
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Finance domain detection | 0% | 80%+ |
| Conversation detection | 50% (rule only) | 90%+ |
| Factual detection | 0% | 70%+ |
| Reasoning detection | 0% | 70%+ |
| Overall domain accuracy | 58-67% | 85%+ |
Attribution
Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.