Skip to content
Back to skills

1545 Requirements Eb74eab3

ASecurity

**Status**: REVIEW **Parent Issue**: #16 **Sub-Issues**: #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
code-qualitypythongogitapici/cdsecurityperformance

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 1545-requirements_eb74eab3 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 1545 Requirements Eb74eab3?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 1545 Requirements Eb74eab3
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-1545-requirements-eb74eab3/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-1545-requirements-eb74eab3)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# Requirements: git-tooling-v2

**Status**: REVIEW
**Parent Issue**: #16
**Sub-Issues**: #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49

## Problem Statement
Current `/zerg:git` has 6 basic actions with naive commit message generation. The entire git workflow pipeline — from commit through PR to release — lacks AI intelligence, safety nets, and project-context awareness. No competing tool offers a unified solution.

## Functional Requirements

### FR-1: Smart Commit Engine (#42) — P0
- Multi-mode: auto / confirm (default) / suggest, configurable per-project
- Semantic diff analysis to detect commit type (feat/fix/refactor/etc.)
- Conventional commit format enforcement
- Smart staging suggestions (related unstaged files)
- Pre-commit message validation
- Multi-line body for complex changes (>3 files)

### FR-2: PR Creation (#43) — P0
- Full context assembly: commits + linked issues + CLAUDE.md + specs + test results
- Structured PR body: summary, change breakdown, test plan, linked issues
- Auto-labeling from conventional commit types
- Reviewer suggestion from CODEOWNERS + git blame
- Size warning at configurable LOC threshold (default: 400)
- Draft mode support

### FR-3: Release Workflow (#44) — P1
- Auto semver from conventional commits since last tag
- CHANGELOG.md generation grouped by type
- Annotated git tag with release notes
- GitHub release via `gh release create`
- Version file auto-detection and update (package.json, pyproject.toml)
- Dry-run and pre-release support

### FR-4: AI Bisect (#45) — P2
- Predictive phase: rank commits by probability of causing symptom
- Semantic good/bad from test output analysis (not just exit codes)
- Root cause explanation for offending commit
- Fix suggestions with confidence levels
- Fallback to manual bisect if AI confidence low

### FR-5: Rescue System (#46) — P1
- Layer 1: Enhanced reflog with human-readable descriptions
- Layer 2: Operation log (.zerg/git-ops.log) with full context
- Layer 3: Auto-snapshots (lightweight tags) before risky operations
- Commands: --list, --undo, --restore, --recover-branch
- Risk detection for rebase/merge/reset/force-push

### FR-6: History Intelligence (#47) — P1
- Smart squash: identify WIP/fixup/related commits
- Logical reorder by change domain
- Message rewriting to conventional format
- Interactive before/after preview
- Non-destructive: new branch created, original preserved

### FR-7: AI Pre-Review (#48) — P1
- Domains: security, performance, quality, architecture
- Pattern-based heuristic analysis (no LLM API calls)
- Confidence filtering (>80% threshold, configurable)
- Actionable fix suggestions per finding
- Report saved to .zerg/review-reports/

### FR-8: Architecture + Config (#49) — P0
- `zerg/git/` package with 7 engine modules
- GitRunner base class extracted from GitOps
- GitOps backward-compatible via shim in `zerg/git_ops.py`
- GitConfig Pydantic model in `.zerg/config.yaml`
- Context detection: solo / team / swarm

## Non-Functional Requirements

- **Backward compatibility**: `from zerg.git_ops import GitOps` must keep working
- **Performance**: All operations complete in <5s (excluding network I/O)
- **Test coverage**: >80% per engine module
- **No new dependencies**: Use stdlib + existing deps (click, rich, pydantic, pyyaml)
- **Command validation**: `python -m zerg.validate_commands` must pass
- **Split compliance**: git.md → git.core.md + git.details.md when >300 lines

## Scope Boundaries

**In scope**: All 8 features above, tests, config, CLI expansion, command file split
**Out of scope**: LLM-assisted review (future), IDE integrations, git hooks installation, CI/CD pipeline generation

## Dependencies
- `gh` CLI for PR creation and GitHub releases (graceful degradation if absent)
- Existing `zerg/git_ops.py` GitOps class (migrated, not rewritten)

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] `zerg/git/` package with all 7 engines + base + types + config
- [ ] `zerg/git_ops.py` is a backward-compatible shim
- [ ] 11 actions in CLI: commit, branch, merge, sync, history, finish, pr, release, review, rescue, bisect
- [ ] GitConfig in .zerg/config.yaml with all sections
- [ ] git.core.md + git.details.md split
- [ ] ~140 new tests across 10 test files, all passing
- [ ] `python -m zerg.validate_commands` passes
- [ ] All 4 existing GitOps consumers work without changes

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.