Skip to content
Back to skills

013 Guidance 618090fc

ASecurity

Comprehensive guidance for conducting information security risk assessments per ISO 27001 Clause 6.1.2. ---

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 11, 2026
securitygoawstestingdatabasesecurity

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 11, 2026

npx -y skills add tools-only/X-Skills --skill 013-guidance_618090fc --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of 013 Guidance 618090fc?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for 013 Guidance 618090fc
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tools-only-013-guidance-618090fc/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tools-only-013-guidance-618090fc)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

SKILL.md
# Risk Assessment Methodology Guide

Comprehensive guidance for conducting information security risk assessments per ISO 27001 Clause 6.1.2.

---

## Table of Contents

- [Risk Assessment Process](#risk-assessment-process)
- [Asset Identification](#asset-identification)
- [Threat Analysis](#threat-analysis)
- [Vulnerability Assessment](#vulnerability-assessment)
- [Risk Calculation](#risk-calculation)
- [Risk Treatment](#risk-treatment)
- [Templates and Tools](#templates-and-tools)

---

## Risk Assessment Process

### ISO 27001 Requirements (Clause 6.1.2)

The organization shall:
1. Define risk assessment process
2. Establish risk criteria (acceptance, assessment)
3. Identify information security risks
4. Analyze and evaluate risks
5. Ensure repeatable and consistent results

### Process Overview

```
1. Context → 2. Asset ID → 3. Threat ID → 4. Vuln ID → 5. Risk Calc → 6. Treatment
     ↑                                                                      |
     └──────────────────── Review & Update ←───────────────────────────────┘
```

---

## Asset Identification

### Asset Categories

| Category | Examples | Typical Classification |
|----------|----------|----------------------|
| Information | Patient records, source code, contracts | Confidential-Critical |
| Software | EHR systems, databases, custom apps | High-Critical |
| Hardware | Servers, medical devices, network gear | High |
| Services | Cloud hosting, backup, email | High |
| People | Admin accounts, key personnel | Critical |
| Intangibles | Reputation, intellectual property | High |

### Classification Scheme

| Level | Definition | Impact if Compromised |
|-------|------------|----------------------|
| Critical | Business-critical, regulated data | Severe - regulatory fines, safety risk |
| High | Important business data | Significant - major disruption |
| Medium | Internal business data | Moderate - operational impact |
| Low | Non-sensitive data | Minor - limited impact |
| Public | Intended for public release | Minimal - no impact |

### Asset Inventory Template

| ID | Asset Name | Type | Owner | Location | Classification | Value |
|----|------------|------|-------|----------|----------------|-------|
| A001 | Patient DB | Information | DBA Lead | AWS RDS | Critical | $5M |
| A002 | EHR App | Software | App Team | AWS ECS | Critical | $2M |
| A003 | Admin Creds | Access | Security | Vault | Critical | N/A |

---

## Threat Analysis

### Healthcare Threat Landscape

| Threat | Likelihood | Target Assets | Motivation |
|--------|------------|---------------|------------|
| Ransomware | High | All systems | Financial |
| Data breach | High | Patient data | Financial/Competitive |
| Phishing | Very High | User accounts | Access |
| Insider threat | Medium | Sensitive data | Various |
| DDoS | Medium | Public services | Disruption |
| Supply chain | Medium | Third-party systems | Access |

### Threat Modeling Approaches

**STRIDE Model:**
- **S**poofing identity
- **T**ampering with data
- **R**epudiation
- **I**nformation disclosure
- **D**enial of service
- **E**levation of privilege

**Threat Actor Categories:**

| Actor | Capability | Motivation | Typical Targets |
|-------|-----------|------------|-----------------|
| Nation-state | Very High | Espionage, disruption | Critical infrastructure |
| Organized crime | High | Financial gain | Healthcare, finance |
| Hacktivists | Medium | Ideology | Public-facing systems |
| Insiders | Varies | Financial, revenge | Sensitive data |
| Script kiddies | Low | Notoriety | Unpatched systems |

---

## Vulnerability Assessment

### Vulnerability Categories

| Category | Examples | Detection Method |
|----------|----------|------------------|
| Technical | Unpatched software, weak configs | Vulnerability scans |
| Process | Missing procedures, gaps | Process audits |
| People | Lack of training, social engineering | Phishing tests |
| Physical | Inadequate access controls | Physical audits |

### Vulnerability Scoring (CVSS Alignment)

| Score Range | Severity | Example |
|-------------|----------|---------|
| 9.0-10.0 | Critical | RCE without authentication |
| 7.0-8.9 | High | Authentication bypass |
| 4.0-6.9 | Medium | Information disclosure |
| 0.1-3.9 | Low | Minor configuration issue |

### Vulnerability Sources

1. **Automated Scans:** Nessus, Qualys, OpenVAS
2. **Penetration Testing:** Annual third-party tests
3. **Code Analysis:** SAST/DAST tools
4. **Configuration Audits:** CIS benchmarks
5. **Threat Intelligence:** CVE feeds, vendor advisories

---

## Risk Calculation

### Risk Formula

```
Risk = Likelihood × Impact
```

### Likelihood Scale (1-5)

| Score | Likelihood | Definition |
|-------|-----------|------------|
| 5 | Almost Certain | Expected to occur multiple times per year |
| 4 | Likely | Expected to occur at least once per year |
| 3 | Possible | Could occur within 2-3 years |
| 2 | Unlikely | Could occur within 5 years |
| 1 | Rare | Unlikely to occur |

### Impact Scale (1-5)

| Score | Impact | Financial | Operational | Reputational |
|-------|--------|-----------|-------------|--------------|
| 5 | Catastrophic | >$10M | Total shutdown | International news |
| 4 | Major | $1M-$10M | Major disruption | National news |
| 3 | Moderate | $100K-$1M | Significant impact | Local news |
| 2 | Minor | $10K-$100K | Minor disruption | Complaints |
| 1 | Negligible | <$10K | Minimal impact | Internal only |

### Risk Matrix

|     | Impact 1 | Impact 2 | Impact 3 | Impact 4 | Impact 5 |
|-----|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
| **L5** | 5 (Low) | 10 (Med) | 15 (High) | 20 (Crit) | 25 (Crit) |
| **L4** | 4 (Low) | 8 (Med) | 12 (Med) | 16 (High) | 20 (Crit) |
| **L3** | 3 (Min) | 6 (Low) | 9 (Med) | 12 (Med) | 15 (High) |
| **L2** | 2 (Min) | 4 (Low) | 6 (Low) | 8 (Med) | 10 (Med) |
| **L1** | 1 (Min) | 2 (Min) | 3 (Min) | 4 (Low) | 5 (Low) |

### Risk Levels

| Level | Score Range | Action Required |
|-------|-------------|-----------------|
| Critical | 20-25 | Immediate action, escalate to management |
| High | 15-19 | Treatment plan within 30 days |
| Medium | 10-14 | Treatment plan within 90 days |
| Low | 5-9 | Accept or implement low-cost controls |
| Minimal | 1-4 | Accept risk, document decision |

---

## Risk Treatment

### Treatment Options (ISO 27001)

| Option | Description | When to Use |
|--------|-------------|-------------|
| Modify | Implement controls to reduce risk | Most risks |
| Avoid | Eliminate the risk source | Unacceptable risks |
| Share | Transfer via insurance/outsourcing | High financial impact |
| Retain | Accept the risk | Low risks, cost-prohibitive controls |

### Control Selection Criteria

1. **Effectiveness:** Reduces likelihood or impact
2. **Cost:** Implementation and maintenance costs
3. **Feasibility:** Technical and operational viability
4. **Compliance:** Meets regulatory requirements
5. **Integration:** Works with existing controls

### Residual Risk

After implementing controls:

```
Residual Risk = Inherent Risk × (1 - Control Effectiveness)
```

| Control Effectiveness | Residual Risk Factor |
|----------------------|---------------------|
| 90%+ | Very Low (0.1×) |
| 70-89% | Low (0.2-0.3×) |
| 50-69% | Moderate (0.4-0.5×) |
| <50% | Limited reduction |

---

## Templates and Tools

### Risk Register Template

| Risk ID | Asset | Threat | Vulnerability | L | I | Inherent | Control | Residual | Owner | Status |
|---------|-------|--------|---------------|---|---|----------|---------|----------|-------|--------|
| R001 | Patient DB | Data breach | Weak encryption | 4 | 5 | 20 | AES-256 | 8 | DBA | Open |
| R002 | Admin access | Credential theft | No MFA | 5 | 5 | 25 | MFA | 5 | Security | Closed |

### Risk Assessment Report Sections

1. **Executive Summary**
   - Key findings
   - Critical/high risks count
   - Overall risk posture

2. **Methodology**
   - Assessment scope
   - Criteria used
   - Limitations

3. **Asset Summary**
   - Asset inventory
   - Classification distribution

4. **Risk Findings**
   - Risk register
   - Heat map visualization
   - Trend analysis

5. **Recommendations**
   - Priority treatments
   - Timeline and resources
   - Residual risk projection

6. **Appendices**
   - Detailed asset list
   - Threat catalog
   - Control mapping

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.