Skip to content
Back to skills

Build Climate Macro

ASecurity

Builds a climate-macro model: climate-augmented macro or integrated-assessment-style model with damage functions, abatement and carbon pricing.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
developmentpythongo

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add tatashbar/Economic-Modeling-Studio --skill build-climate-macro --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Build Climate Macro?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Build Climate Macro
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/tatashbar-build-climate-macro/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tatashbar-build-climate-macro)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: build-climate-macro
description: "Builds a climate-macro model: climate-augmented macro or integrated-assessment-style model with damage functions, abatement and carbon pricing."
---
<!-- Generated from .claude/skills/build-climate-macro/SKILL.md by tools/sync_agents.py. Edit the source, then run the script. -->

# /build-climate-macro — Build Climate Macro

**Category:** Build · **Primary agent:** `climate-macro-specialist`

Builds a climate-macro model: climate-augmented macro or integrated-assessment-style model with damage functions, abatement and carbon pricing.

Arguments: whatever the user wrote after the command name.

## Purpose
Build a model that connects climate and the macroeconomy: emissions from economic activity, damages from warming, abatement and its costs, carbon pricing and its revenue, and adaptation. The output is a model whose normative choices (damages, discounting) are explicit and varied, and whose results are presented as ranges that reflect deep uncertainty.

**Use it when** the question involves carbon pricing paths, the social cost of carbon, long-run damages, transition dynamics, or the macro and fiscal implications of climate scenarios.

**Do not use it when** the question is a near-term carbon-tax incidence or revenue estimate (`/carbon-pricing-analysis`), a scenario translation into an existing macro model (`/climate-scenario`), or sector-level detail without macro feedback (`/build-io-sam`).

## Before you start
1. **Check required inputs.** For each input below record `FOUND` or `ABSENT` (never 'assumed'):
   - Approved model-spec
   - Emissions and energy data
   - Damage-function evidence
   If a required input is `ABSENT`, that part is **`NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA`**: do not estimate or invent it; name what is missing and which skill produces it. If all required inputs are absent, stop and say so.
2. **Check confidentiality.** Identify the data classification level of the inputs (`.claude/docs/confidentiality-and-ai-use.md`). Do not proceed with restricted or confidential data in a way the policy does not allow.
3. **Collaboration.** Follow `.claude/docs/collaboration-protocol.md`: ask questions first, present options, get approval before writing files, and update `production/session-state/active.md` after each approved section.

## Agents
- `climate-macro-specialist` — primary agent; coordinates the work and integrates results
- `carbon-pricing-emissions-specialist` — Analyzes carbon pricing and emissions policy
- `physical-climate-risk-specialist` — Quantifies physical climate risk
- `transition-risk-energy-specialist` — Analyzes energy systems and transition risk
- `economic-reasoning-specialist` — Frames the economic question and tests whether results make economic sense

Each agent is defined in `.claude/agents/<name>.md`. If your tool runs subagents, run these agents as subagents, in parallel where the steps are independent; otherwise read each agent's file and apply its instructions in turn. Subagents only write to the paths named in your instructions.

## Key design decisions (present options, let the user choose)
| Decision | Typical options | What it changes |
|---|---|---|
| Model family | climate-augmented DSGE, IAM (DICE-type), multi-sector, CGE-linked | Horizon, policy detail, uncertainty treatment |
| Damage function | quadratic level damages, growth damages, empirically estimated nonlinear, tipping points | Size and timing of losses |
| Discounting | Ramsey parameters, declining rates, descriptive versus prescriptive | Present value of damages and optimal carbon price |
| Energy detail | aggregate emissions intensity, energy nest, explicit technologies | Abatement costs and transition dynamics |
| Uncertainty | deterministic scenarios, Monte Carlo over parameters, robust decision | How uncertainty is reported |

## Workflow
1. Choose the structure (climate-augmented DSGE, IAM-style, multi-sector, CGE-linked) with the user
   - Match the horizon and policy question to the family; state what the model cannot answer
2. Specify emissions, abatement, damage and (if relevant) adaptation blocks; document discounting and damage-function choices
   - Label normative choices as such; keep alternatives ready to run
3. Calibrate and test the model against historical emissions and energy intensity
   - Reconcile with national inventories and energy balances
4. Run baseline and policy pathways; test sensitivity to damages, discounting and technology costs
   - Include orderly and delayed transition paths where relevant
5. Report deep uncertainty as ranges and document limitations
   - Show results across damage functions and discount rates side by side
6. Register the model as a lego set (`/lego-map`): a baseplate plus bricks with declared studs (variables, units, timing) and stubs, so components can later be attached, detached or swapped

## Checkpoints with the user
- After choosing the structure: confirm the horizon and questions
- After specifying damages and discounting: confirm which alternatives to report
- After baseline calibration: confirm the emissions baseline

## Common pitfalls
- A single damage function presented as fact
- Discount rates chosen without stating their normative basis
- Technology-cost assumptions anchored on outdated estimates
- Mixing scenario sources with incompatible assumptions

## Output
`models/climate/<name>/ (+ model.lego.json)`

The folder holds model code, calibration and emissions-baseline files, scenario scripts, the sensitivity pack across damages, discounting and technology costs, the limitations note and the lego manifest. Every run saves its results to `output/<run-id>/` in the model folder, with a run log (`.claude/rules/model-code.md`).

## Gate / verdict
- Damage-function and discount-rate alternatives shown
- Emissions accounting consistent with the baseline
- Lego manifest passes `python tools/lego.py check`
- Normative choices are labeled and alternatives reported side by side
- Results are presented as ranges, not single paths

## Suggested next steps
- `/climate-scenario`
- `/carbon-pricing-analysis`
- `/validate-model`
- `/lego-map`

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.