Skip to content
Back to skills

Memtrace Episode Replay

ASecurity

Always use to replay source-code evolution, understand why code looks this way, inspect implementation attempts, reversions, past reasoning, or abandoned approaches across commits and working-tree episodes. Do not use git log, git diff, Grep, or manual history reconstruction; Memtrace has episodic symbol replay.

  • 487 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
developmentdebugginggit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add syncable-dev/memtrace-public --skill memtrace-episode-replay --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Memtrace Episode Replay?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Memtrace Episode Replay
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/syncable-dev-memtrace-episode-replay/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syncable-dev-memtrace-episode-replay)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: memtrace-episode-replay
description: "Always use to replay source-code evolution, understand why code looks this way, inspect implementation attempts, reversions, past reasoning, or abandoned approaches across commits and working-tree episodes. Do not use git log, git diff, Grep, or manual history reconstruction; Memtrace has episodic symbol replay."
---

## Overview

Replay the sub-commit implementation narrative for any symbol. Between any two commits, Memtrace recorded every file save as a `working_tree` episode. This tool surfaces that sequence — the attempts, the reversions, the iterative refinements — not just the final committed state.

**Git shows A→B. Episode replay shows every step in between.**

This is the only tool that can answer: "why does this code look like this?" without relying on commit messages or comments.

## Steps

### 1. Identify the symbol and time window

Use `find_symbol` to get the exact symbol name if needed. Determine the window:
- `from` — when to start (e.g. a few days before a confusing commit)
- `to` — when to end (usually the commit timestamp or now)

If you don't know the window, call `get_timeline` first to find when the symbol changed.

### 2. Call `get_episode_replay`

```
get_episode_replay(
  repo_id: "...",
  symbol: "execute",
  from: "2026-04-10T00:00:00Z",
  to:   "2026-04-13T00:00:00Z",
  include_working_tree: true,   // false = commits only
  compress: true                // collapse identical-hash runs
)
```

### 3. Read the narrative_hint sequence

Each episode has a `narrative_hint` — derived automatically from AST hash patterns:

| Hint | What it means |
|---|---|
| `committed` | A real git commit — the "public record" checkpoint |
| `pre_commit_finalization` | Last working_tree save before a commit — the final draft |
| `iterative_refinement` | 3+ consecutive working_tree saves — active development in progress |
| `attempted_and_reverted` | Hash returned to a prior state — something was tried and backed out |
| `no_change` | File was saved but this symbol didn't change |
| `working_tree_save` | A single file save with structural changes |

### 4. Reconstruct the implementation story

Read the sequence like a narrative:

```
committed              ← "here's where we started"
working_tree_save      ← "first attempt"
iterative_refinement   ← "refining the approach"
attempted_and_reverted ← "tried X, it was wrong, backed out"
pre_commit_finalization← "final version before commit"
committed              ← "here's what shipped"
```

The gap between `committed` entries is the implementation story.

### 5. Identify what to act on

| Pattern | Implication |
|---|---|
| `attempted_and_reverted` appears | There was a tried-and-abandoned approach — understand why before trying similar |
| Multiple `iterative_refinement` clusters | The author was unsure — this area may need extra care |
| No working_tree episodes (commits only) | Code was written elsewhere or pasted in — less implementation history available |
| Very short episode sequence | Straightforward change — low implementation complexity |

## When to Use

- **Before modifying unfamiliar code** — understand the intent, not just the current state
- **Post-session debugging** — replay what was tried during a broken session
- **Code review** — understand the reasoning behind non-obvious implementations
- **Avoiding dead ends** — check if the approach you're about to try was already attempted and reverted

## Compression

With `compress: true` (default), consecutive episodes with identical `ast_hash` are collapsed to first+last of the run. Cosmetic saves and whitespace-only edits are filtered out. Only structurally significant transitions are shown.

With `compress: false`, every single save is shown — useful when you want to see exact timing between saves.

## Common Mistakes

| Mistake | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| Only reading the final committed code | The commit shows *what*, the episode replay shows *why* — always check both for unfamiliar code |
| Ignoring `attempted_and_reverted` hints | These are the most valuable entries — they represent knowledge about what doesn't work |
| Using `include_working_tree: false` by default | Commits-only loses all the sub-commit narrative — only use this if you explicitly want commit-level granularity |
| Large windows with compress off | Very long histories produce noise; use `compress: true` unless you need exact save-by-save granularity |

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.