Deep OWASP reference for security reviews and secure implementation. Covers OWASP Top 10:2025, ASVS 5.0 levels, secure code patterns (injection, auth, error handling, fail-closed), language-specific security quirks for 20 languages, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), and Agentic AI security (2026). Use when reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, implementing authentication/authorization, handling user input, hardening an LLM or AI-agent application, or discussing web application security in depth.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install smk-labs/claude-plugins---
name: owasp-security
description: Deep OWASP reference for security reviews and secure implementation. Covers OWASP Top 10:2025, ASVS 5.0 levels, secure code patterns (injection, auth, error handling, fail-closed), language-specific security quirks for 20 languages, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), and Agentic AI security (2026). Use when reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, implementing authentication/authorization, handling user input, hardening an LLM or AI-agent application, or discussing web application security in depth.
---
# OWASP Security Best Practices
Apply these security standards when writing or reviewing code.
For deeper material, load on demand:
- [references/language-security-quirks.md](references/language-security-quirks.md): language-specific pitfalls and unsafe/safe patterns for 20 languages (JS/TS, Python, Java, C#, PHP, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, C/C++, Scala, R, Perl, Bash, Lua, Elixir, Dart, PowerShell, SQL). Read it when reviewing code in a specific language.
- [references/llm-agentic-security.md](references/llm-agentic-security.md): OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) and Agentic AI security (2026), with checklists and code patterns. Read it when the code calls an LLM, builds a RAG pipeline, or wires up an AI agent with tools.
## Quick Reference: OWASP Top 10:2025
| # | Vulnerability | Key Prevention |
|---|---------------|----------------|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Deny by default, enforce server-side, verify ownership |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Harden configs, disable defaults, minimize features |
| A03 | Supply Chain Failures | Lock versions, verify integrity, audit dependencies |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | TLS 1.2+, AES-256-GCM, Argon2/bcrypt for passwords |
| A05 | Injection | Parameterized queries, input validation, safe APIs |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Threat model, rate limit, design security controls |
| A07 | Auth Failures | MFA, check breached passwords, secure sessions |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Sign packages, SRI for CDN, safe serialization |
| A09 | Logging Failures | Log security events, structured format, alerting |
| A10 | Exception Handling | Fail-closed, hide internals, log with context |
## Security Code Review Checklist
When reviewing code, check for these issues:
### Input Handling
- [ ] All user input validated server-side
- [ ] Using parameterized queries (not string concatenation)
- [ ] Input length limits enforced
- [ ] Allowlist validation preferred over denylist
### Authentication & Sessions
- [ ] Passwords hashed with Argon2/bcrypt (not MD5/SHA1)
- [ ] Session tokens have sufficient entropy (128+ bits)
- [ ] Sessions invalidated on logout
- [ ] MFA available for sensitive operations
### Access Control
- [ ] Check for framework-level auth middleware (e.g. Next.js middleware.ts, proxy.ts, Express middleware) before flagging missing per-route auth
- [ ] Authorization checked on every request
- [ ] Using object references the user cannot manipulate
- [ ] Deny by default policy
- [ ] Privilege escalation paths reviewed
### Data Protection
- [ ] Sensitive data encrypted at rest
- [ ] TLS for all data in transit
- [ ] No sensitive data in URLs/logs
- [ ] Secrets in environment/vault (not code)
### Error Handling
- [ ] No stack traces exposed to users
- [ ] Fail-closed on errors (deny, not allow)
- [ ] All exceptions logged with context
- [ ] Consistent error responses (no enumeration)
## Secure Code Patterns
### SQL Injection Prevention
```python
# UNSAFE
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# SAFE
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))
```
### Command Injection Prevention
```python
# UNSAFE
os.system(f"convert {filename} output.png")
# SAFE
subprocess.run(["convert", filename, "output.png"], shell=False)
```
### Password Storage
```python
# UNSAFE
hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()
# SAFE
from argon2 import PasswordHasher
PasswordHasher().hash(password)
```
### Access Control
```python
# UNSAFE - No authorization check
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
return db.get_user(user_id)
# SAFE - Authorization enforced
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
@login_required
def get_user(user_id):
if current_user.id != user_id and not current_user.is_admin:
abort(403)
return db.get_user(user_id)
```
### Error Handling
```python
# UNSAFE - Exposes internals
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
return str(e), 500
# SAFE - Fail-closed, log context
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
error_id = uuid.uuid4()
logger.exception(f"Error {error_id}: {e}")
return {"error": "An error occurred", "id": str(error_id)}, 500
```
### Fail-Closed Pattern
```python
# UNSAFE - Fail-open
def check_permission(user, resource):
try:
return auth_service.check(user, resource)
except Exception:
return True # DANGEROUS!
# SAFE - Fail-closed
def check_permission(user, resource):
try:
return auth_service.check(user, resource)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Auth check failed: {e}")
return False # Deny on error
```
## ASVS 5.0 Key Requirements
### Level 1 (All Applications)
- Passwords minimum 12 characters
- Check against breached password lists
- Rate limiting on authentication
- Session tokens 128+ bits entropy
- HTTPS everywhere
### Level 2 (Sensitive Data)
- All L1 requirements plus:
- MFA for sensitive operations
- Cryptographic key management
- Comprehensive security logging
- Input validation on all parameters
### Level 3 (Critical Systems)
- All L1/L2 requirements plus:
- Hardware security modules for keys
- Threat modeling documentation
- Advanced monitoring and alerting
- Penetration testing validation
## Deep Security Analysis Mindset
When reviewing any language, think like a senior security researcher:
1. **Memory Model:** How does the language handle memory? Managed vs manual? GC pauses exploitable?
2. **Type System:** Weak typing = type confusion attacks. Look for coercion exploits.
3. **Serialization:** Every language has a native-object deserializer. All are dangerous with untrusted input.
4. **Concurrency:** Race conditions, TOCTOU, atomicity failures specific to the threading model.
5. **FFI Boundaries:** Native interop is where type safety breaks down.
6. **Standard Library:** Historic CVEs in std libs (Python urllib, Java XML, Ruby OpenSSL).
7. **Package Ecosystem:** Typosquatting, dependency confusion, malicious packages.
8. **Build System:** Makefile/gradle/npm script injection during builds.
9. **Runtime Behavior:** Debug vs release differences (Rust overflow, C++ assertions).
10. **Error Handling:** How does the language fail? Silently? With stack traces? Fail-open?
**For any language not covered in the reference file:** research its specific CWE patterns, CVE history, and known footguns. The examples are entry points, not complete coverage.
## When to Apply This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Writing authentication or authorization code
- Handling user input or external data
- Implementing cryptography or password storage
- Reviewing code for security vulnerabilities
- Designing API endpoints
- Building AI agent systems
- Integrating LLMs, RAG pipelines, or function-calling tools (read the LLM/agentic reference)
- Configuring application security settings
- Handling errors and exceptions
- Working with third-party dependencies
- **Working in any language**: apply the deep analysis mindset above and read the language-quirks reference for the language at handNo comments yet. Be the first to comment!