Skip to content
Back to skills

Code Review

ASecurity

Code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification. Use when receiving code review feedback, completing tasks requiring review, or before making completion claims.

  • 21 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 1 copy
  • 16 views
  • Added February 11, 2026
developmentgocode-review

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add siviter-xyz/dot-agent --skill code-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Code Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Code Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/siviter-xyz-code-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/siviter-xyz-code-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: code-review
description: Code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification. Use when receiving code review feedback, completing tasks requiring review, or before making completion claims.
license: MIT
---

# Code Review

Guide proper code review practices emphasizing technical rigor, evidence-based claims, and verification over performative responses.

## Overview

Code review requires three distinct practices:

1. **Receiving feedback** - Technical evaluation over performative agreement
2. **Requesting reviews** - Systematic review processes
3. **Verification gates** - Evidence before any completion claims

## Core Principle

**Technical correctness over social comfort.** Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Evidence before claims.

## When to Use

### Receiving Feedback
- Receiving code review comments from any source
- Feedback seems unclear or technically questionable
- Multiple review items need prioritization
- External reviewer lacks full context
- Suggestion conflicts with existing decisions

### Requesting Review
- Completing tasks in subagent-driven development (after EACH task)
- Finishing major features or refactors
- Before merging to main branch
- Stuck and need fresh perspective
- After fixing complex bugs

### Verification Gates
- About to claim tests pass, build succeeds, or work is complete
- Before committing, pushing, or creating PRs
- Moving to next task
- Any statement suggesting success/completion

## Quick Decision Tree

```
SITUATION?
│
├─ Received feedback
│  ├─ Unclear items? → STOP, ask for clarification first
│  ├─ From human partner? → Understand, then implement
│  └─ From external reviewer? → Verify technically before implementing
│
├─ Completed work
│  ├─ Major feature/task? → Request systematic review
│  └─ Before merge? → Request systematic review
│
└─ About to claim status
   ├─ Have fresh verification? → State claim WITH evidence
   └─ No fresh verification? → RUN verification command first
```

## CI Verification

Before any completion claim or commit:
- Run CI checks (types, tests, lint)
- Prefer single CI command if available
- Verify all checks pass
- Do not proceed if checks fail

## References

For detailed protocols, see:
- `references/receiving-feedback.md` - How to handle code review feedback
- `references/requesting-review.md` - Systematic review processes
- `references/verification-gates.md` - Evidence before claims protocol

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • references/receiving-feedback.md1.4 KB
  • references/requesting-review.md1.1 KB
  • references/verification-gates.md1.5 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.