Audit the tracked `AGENTS.md` tree against best practices, write `.agents/AGENTS_TREE_REVIEW.md`, and propose cleanup, compaction, conflict resolution, or sharding when needed. May auto-apply only trivial non-semantic hygiene fixes.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add siarhei-belavus/agent-public --skill review-agents-tree --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Review Agents Tree?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/siarhei-belavus-review-agents-tree)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: review-agents-tree
description: Audit the tracked `AGENTS.md` tree against best practices, write `.agents/AGENTS_TREE_REVIEW.md`, and propose cleanup, compaction, conflict resolution, or sharding when needed. May auto-apply only trivial non-semantic hygiene fixes.
---
# review-agents-tree
Manual durable-context hygiene pass.
Not a workflow gate.
Not a replacement for `distill-knowledge`.
Run this periodically to keep the tracked `AGENTS.md` tree lean, conflict-free, and aligned with current code/tests.
## Read first
- `../references/persistent-artifacts-contract.md`
- `../../references/communication-mode.md`
- root tracked `AGENTS.md`
- all tracked local `AGENTS.md` files under the repository
- tracked `AGENTS.override.md` paths only to detect misuse or drift; never treat them as canonical repo truth
- relevant code/tests only when a guidance conflict or staleness finding needs verification
## Scope
This skill owns:
- periodic best-practice audit of the tracked `AGENTS.md` tree
- writing `.agents/AGENTS_TREE_REVIEW.md`
- proposing cleanup, compaction, conflict resolution, and sharding plans
- auto-applying only trivial non-semantic hygiene fixes when they are clearly safe
- being the only non-distill skill allowed to touch tracked `AGENTS.md`, and only for those trivial non-semantic hygiene fixes
It does not own:
- writing `AGENTS.override.md`
- semantic doctrine changes without explicit human approval
- shard creation, shard moves, or meaning-changing conflict resolution without explicit human approval
- task-local packet work unless a current task explicitly asked for this audit as part of that packet
## Audit workflow
1. Discover the tracked tree.
- Enumerate all tracked `AGENTS.md` files.
- Note any tracked `AGENTS.override.md` files as likely hygiene smells.
- Build the effective hierarchy from root downward.
2. Audit file shape.
- Confirm every tracked `AGENTS.md` has `## Scope`.
- Confirm section names stay canonical when present.
- Flag missing, tautological, or low-value `## Scope` sections.
- Flag `## Entrypoints` sections in deep leaf shards when they add no real wayfinding value.
- Confirm other sections are present only when they contain real content.
- Flag files that drift from canonical section names.
3. Audit lean-ness.
- Treat broad overview prose, directory dumps, repeated boilerplate, and generic cookbook content as compaction smells.
- Treat roughly 200+ lines as a review trigger for compaction or sharding, not an automatic failure.
4. Audit specificity.
- Flag vague, non-verifiable instructions.
- Prefer exact commands, stable owner/module names, hard constraints, and durable rationale.
- Treat raw file-path links as a fragility smell unless they are unusually stable and clearly necessary.
5. Audit hierarchy quality.
- Flag parent/child duplication when the child adds no meaningful specialization.
- Flag local files that restate root doctrine instead of carrying only boundary-local guidance.
- Flag guidance placed too high or too low relative to the stable owner boundary.
6. Audit conflicts and ambiguity.
- Flag contradictory rules across parent/child tracked files.
- Flag ambiguous wording that could lead different agents to make different choices.
- Verify suspicious conflicts against code/tests before concluding.
7. Audit staleness.
- Flag stale paths, commands, owner/module references, or other brittle anchors.
- Flag entries that are now better encoded in code/tests and should be pruned.
8. Audit for task-state leakage.
- Flag plan recaps, worklog residue, temporary migration notes, or current-task chatter that belongs in `.plans/*`, not tracked `AGENTS.md`.
9. Decide whether a trivial hygiene fix is safe.
- Safe auto-fix classes:
- section heading normalization to canonical names
- whitespace / formatting cleanup
- deduping exact duplicate bullets
- removing obviously broken file references when the correct target is unambiguous
- reordering within one section when meaning does not change
- If any fix changes meaning, defers a judgment call, or changes topology, do not apply it automatically.
10. Write `.agents/AGENTS_TREE_REVIEW.md`.
- Summarize current tree health.
- Record any auto-applied hygiene fixes.
- Emit concrete findings and approval-gated proposals.
## Findings categories
Use compact `AT#` findings.
Good finding classes:
- bloated file that should be compacted
- duplicated guidance across parent/child files
- conflict or ambiguity between tracked layers
- stale path/command/reference
- task-local residue leaking into durable context
- missing, tautological, or low-value `Scope`
- low-value leaf `Entrypoints`
- fragile raw file-path links
- file broad enough that sharding should be considered
- tracked `AGENTS.override.md` or override misuse smell
## Best-practice bar
A strong tracked `AGENTS.md` tree is:
- lean
- specific
- path-scoped by stable owner boundary
- conflict-free
- low-duplication
- explicit about commands/validation, constraints, and durable decisions only where needed
- consistently shaped, with a lean non-tautological `Scope` in every tracked file
- sparing with `Entrypoints`, mainly at root/hub levels
- resistant to path fragility
## Report shape
Default `.agents/AGENTS_TREE_REVIEW.md` should include:
- `Status:` `healthy` | `needs_cleanup` | `needs_approval_for_refactor`
- `Auto-applied hygiene fixes:`
- `AT# findings:` ordered by severity
- `Approval-gated proposals:`
- `Suggested next pass:` `no_op` | `compact_existing_files` | `apply_semantic_cleanup_after_approval` | `propose_sharding_after_approval`
## Do not
- treat `AGENTS.override.md` as canonical repo context
- auto-apply semantic changes
- auto-create new tracked shards
- auto-merge or move tracked shards
- rewrite guidance just to make it prettier
- preserve stale or redundant prose because it feels helpful
## Initiative-mode note
Initiative packets and child packets are not tracked durable memory. Review them only if a human explicitly asks how they should later distill into tracked `AGENTS.md`.
## Communication
Honor active caveman mode for user-facing replies per `../../references/communication-mode.md`. Keep durable artifacts normal unless the human asks otherwise. Drop caveman for safety/clarity when needed, then resume.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!