Skip to content
Back to skills

Media Appetite Analysis

ASecurity

A skill for identifying what stories journalists want to tell - the narratives, anxieties, and trends that make certain fictions irresistible.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 6 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
code-qualitygogitsecurity

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add sethmblack/paks-skills --skill media-appetite-analysis --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Media Appetite Analysis?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Media Appetite Analysis
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/sethmblack-media-appetite-analysis/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sethmblack-media-appetite-analysis)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: media-appetite-analysis
description: A skill for identifying what stories journalists want to tell - the narratives, anxieties, and trends that make certain fictions irresistible.
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: sethmblack
  version: 1.0.4471
repository: https://github.com/sethmblack/paks-skills
keywords:
- media-appetite-analysis
- storytelling
- writing
---

# Media Appetite Analysis

A skill for identifying what stories journalists want to tell - the narratives, anxieties, and trends that make certain fictions irresistible.

## When to Use

- Before designing a media hoax to ensure it feeds existing appetites
- When analyzing why certain stories go viral while others don't
- When understanding media's role in constructing reality
- When predicting what kinds of misinformation will spread

## Inputs

| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| input_data | Yes | The primary data or content to analyze |
| context | No | Additional background or constraints (default: none) |
| output_format | No | Preferred format for results (default: structured markdown) |

## Workflow
### Step 1: Phase 1: Track Current Coverage

Monitor what's getting attention:
- Trending topics across major outlets
- Stories that get picked up widely vs. ignored
- Angles being pursued on breaking news
- Features and human interest patterns

What are they already writing about? That's what they want more of.

### Step 2: Phase 2: Identify Narrative Templates

Recognize recurring story shapes:
- **Trend piece**: "X is the new Y" / "Everyone is doing Z now"
- **David vs. Goliath**: Small challenger takes on powerful institution
- **Hidden danger**: Everyday thing is secretly harmful
- **Secret solution**: Simple fix the establishment doesn't want you to know
- **Moral panic**: New technology/behavior threatening children/society
- **Comeback story**: Fallen figure rises again
- **Too good to be true**: Heartwarming story that confirms faith in humanity

These templates are magnetic. Stories fitting them get coverage.

### Step 3: Phase 3: Map Current Anxieties

Identify what the public (and journalists) are worried about:
- Technology concerns (AI, social media, privacy)
- Health fears (new diseases, hidden toxins, mental health)
- Economic anxiety (jobs, housing, inequality)
- Political polarization (extremism, threats to democracy)
- Environmental crisis (climate, pollution, extinction)

Stories that connect to active anxieties have built-in audience.

### Step 4: Phase 4: Find the Gaps

Look for underserved appetites:
- Topics getting attention but lacking good sources
- Emerging concerns without established experts
- Stories everyone wants to write but can't find
- Beats where journalists are hungry for leads

The gap is the opportunity.

### Step 5: Phase 5: Test Your Analysis

Validate by prediction:
- Guess which stories will get pickup, which won't
- Track your accuracy
- Refine your model based on results

## Output Format

A media appetite analysis including:
1. Current trending topics and coverage patterns
2. Active narrative templates with examples
3. Dominant anxieties in target media
4. Identified gaps and opportunities
5. Predictions with reasoning

## Constraints

- Appetites shift quickly - analysis has shelf life
- Different outlets have different appetites
- What journalists want may differ from what editors approve
- Confirmation bias affects analysis - verify with data
- Understanding appetites doesn't mean all hoaxes will succeed

## Outputs

**Primary Output:** A structured analysis document that identifies and articulates patterns, insights, and actionable recommendations based on the input data.

**Format:**
```markdown
## Analysis: [Topic]

### Key Findings
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
- [Finding 3]

### Recommendations
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
3. [Action 3]
```

**Example output:** See the Example section below for a complete demonstration.

## Additional Notes

**Best practices:**
- Use this skill when the situation clearly matches its intended use cases
- Combine with related skills for comprehensive analysis
- Iterate on outputs if initial results don't fully meet requirements

**Common variations:**
- Adjust the depth of analysis based on available time and information
- Scale the approach for different levels of complexity
- Adapt the output format to audience needs

**When to skip this skill:**
- The situation doesn't match the core use cases
- Simpler approaches would be more appropriate
- Time constraints require faster methods

## Example

**Input**: Analyze media appetite around workplace technology (for potential hoax design)

**Output**:
"Current coverage: heavy focus on AI replacing jobs, remote work surveillance, productivity tracking. Narrative templates active: 'hidden danger' (your employer is watching more than you know), 'trend piece' (companies doing X to monitor workers). Active anxieties: job security, privacy, work-life balance erosion. Gap identified: limited expert sources on 'employee resistance to surveillance.' Opportunity: fictional organization helping workers detect/counter workplace monitoring would fit trend piece + David vs. Goliath templates, addresses privacy anxiety, fills expert gap. Prediction: would get significant pickup from labor-friendly outlets within 2 weeks of credible pitch."

## Integration

Works with:
- **media-hoax-design**: Appetite analysis informs hoax design
- **propaganda-model-analysis**: Deeper structural understanding of media
- **spectrum-of-debate**: Understanding what falls within/outside acceptable coverage

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in code-quality →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.