Skip to content
Back to skills

Plan Interview

ASecurity

Adaptive interview-driven spec generation. Use when converting rough plans into comprehensive specifications, needing structured requirements gathering, or transforming ideas into implementation-ready documentation.

  • 222 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added February 7, 2026
developmentgobashtestingapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 7 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned February 12, 2026

npx -y skills add secondsky/claude-skills --skill plan-interview --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Plan Interview?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Plan Interview
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/secondsky-plan-interview/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/secondsky-plan-interview)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: plan-interview
description: Adaptive interview-driven spec generation. Use when converting rough plans into comprehensive specifications, needing structured requirements gathering, or transforming ideas into implementation-ready documentation.
---

# Plan Interview Skill

Transform rough plans into comprehensive, implementation-ready specifications through adaptive, structured interviews.

## When to Use

- Converting a plan or idea into a detailed specification
- Gathering requirements through structured questioning
- Transforming rough documentation into implementation-ready specs
- Ensuring all edge cases, risks, and stakeholders are considered before implementation

## Available Components

### Command: `/plan-interview:interview [plan-file]`

Adaptive interview that calibrates depth based on plan complexity:

| Complexity | Signals | Questions |
|------------|---------|-----------|
| **Simple** | Single feature, clear scope | 10-15 |
| **Moderate** | Multi-component, some integrations | 18-23 |
| **Complex** | Cross-system, many stakeholders | 22-28 |

**Usage:**
```bash
/plan-interview:interview docs/feature-plan.md
# Output: docs/feature-plan-spec.md
```

### Agent: `spec-reviewer`

Autonomous quality analysis of specifications across 4 dimensions:
- **Completeness** (25 pts) - All sections populated?
- **Consistency** (25 pts) - No contradictions?
- **Clarity** (25 pts) - No ambiguous language?
- **Edge Cases** (25 pts) - Error handling defined?

Triggers when you say "review my spec" or "check specification quality".

## Interview Phases

1. **Foundations & Scope** - Stakeholders, success criteria, constraints, MVP scope
2. **Technical Deep-Dive** - Architecture, data models, scalability, security
3. **User Experience** - Personas, flows, cognitive load, error recovery
4. **Risks & Tradeoffs** - Risk categorization, blast radius, contingency plans
5. **Operationalization** - Testing, deployment, monitoring
6. **Wrap-Up** (optional) - Only for complex plans with remaining gaps

## Interview Philosophy

**Core Principle**: Depth over breadth. Better to deeply understand critical aspects than superficially cover everything.

**Key Techniques**:
- Non-obvious questions - Skip what the plan already answers
- Edge probing - What happens in unusual cases?
- Assumption surfacing - Make implicit beliefs explicit
- Contradiction detection - Flag when answers don't align
- Adaptive depth - Probe deeper on complex areas, move faster on clear ones

## Spec Output Structure

Generated specs include:
- Overview (problem, solution, success criteria, stakeholders)
- Functional and non-functional requirements
- Technical design (architecture, data models, APIs, security)
- User experience (personas, flows, states, edge cases)
- Risks and mitigations (risk register, tradeoffs, contingency plans)
- Implementation notes (key decisions, dependencies, migration)
- Operationalization (testing, deployment, monitoring)
- Open questions and out-of-scope items
- Phasing (MVP vs future)

## References

Load these for deeper guidance during interviews:
- `references/phase-1-clarifications.md` - Foundations questions and pitfalls
- `references/phase-2-technical.md` - Architecture discussion patterns
- `references/phase-3-ux.md` - Persona development, UX patterns
- `references/phase-4-risks.md` - Risk assessment frameworks
- `references/interview-techniques.md` - Cross-cutting interview skills
- `references/example-spec.md` - Annotated high-quality spec example

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB
  • references/example-spec.md11 KB
  • references/interview-techniques.md6.4 KB
  • references/phase-1-clarifications.md5 KB
  • references/phase-2-technical.md5.1 KB
  • references/phase-3-ux.md5 KB
  • references/phase-4-risks.md5.6 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.