This skill should be used when the user asks to "write requirements", "create user stories", "define acceptance criteria", "decompose a feature", "analyze an issue", "write a PRD", "create user stories", "acceptance criteria", "roadmap", "feature spec", or discusses "INVEST" criteria, "ambiguity", or "story estimation".
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add saitarrun/Devforge-ai --skill requirements --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Requirements?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/saitarrun-requirements)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: requirements
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "write requirements", "create user stories", "define acceptance criteria", "decompose a feature", "analyze an issue", "write a PRD", "create user stories", "acceptance criteria", "roadmap", "feature spec", or discusses "INVEST" criteria, "ambiguity", or "story estimation".
version: 1.0.0
---
# Skill: Requirements & User Stories (INVEST)
## INVEST Criteria — Making Stories Actionable
A well-written user story is **INVEST-compliant**:
- **Independent**: Story doesn't depend on another story (can be built in any order)
- **Negotiable**: Details can be discussed and refined (not cast in stone)
- **Valuable**: Delivers value to the end user (not just internal plumbing)
- **Estimable**: Engineer can estimate size (2-13 story points)
- **Small**: Fits in a single sprint (1-2 weeks max)
- **Testable**: Acceptance criteria are clear and provable
## Story Format
```markdown
## User Story: [Feature Name]
As a [role/persona]
I want to [action/capability]
So that [business value/outcome]
### Acceptance Criteria
- Given [precondition]
When [action]
Then [observable result]
### Edge Cases & Questions
- Q: What happens if [scenario]?
- Q: Should we support [case]?
### Definition of Done
- [ ] Code written and reviewed
- [ ] Acceptance criteria tests pass
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Performance tested (if relevant)
- [ ] Security review passed (if relevant)
```
## Story Estimation
- **Small (2-3 pts)**: Can be done in a day, low complexity, well-understood
- **Medium (5 pts)**: Takes 2-3 days, some unknowns, requires design
- **Large (8 pts)**: Takes full sprint, many unknowns, high risk
- **Too Large (13+ pts)**: Break into smaller stories
## Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Bad Example | Good Example |
|---------|-------------|--------------|
| Not independent | "Add payment form" depends on "Add payment backend" | "Add payment form UI" + "Add payment API" (can be mocked) |
| Not valuable | "Refactor database layer" | "Enable payments via Stripe" |
| Not testable | "Code should be fast" | "Page load <2 seconds on 3G" |
| Too large | "Build entire user profile system" | "User can upload profile photo" |
| Unclear | "Handle edge cases" | "Given missing email, show validation error" |
## Ambiguity Detection
Always ask these questions before starting work:
1. **Scope**: Are there other features needed first? Any dependencies?
2. **Success**: How do we know this is done? What's the test?
3. **Users**: Who specifically benefits? All users or subset?
4. **Edge Cases**: What happens if user has no data? Empty input? Slow connection?
5. **Performance**: Are there speed requirements?
6. **Integration**: Does this affect other features? APIs? Databases?

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!