Fix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills --skill tdd-bug-fix --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tdd Bug Fix?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rshankras-tdd-bug-fix)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tdd-bug-fix
description: Fix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.
allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, AskUserQuestion]
last_verified: 2026-07-16
review_by: 2027-06-22
---
# TDD Bug Fix
Fix bugs the right way: reproduce first, fix second, verify always. Especially critical when using AI to generate fixes — the test ensures the AI actually solved the problem.
## When This Skill Activates
Use this skill when the user:
- Reports a bug and wants it fixed
- Says "this is broken" or "this doesn't work"
- Asks to "fix and add a test" or "fix with TDD"
- Wants to ensure a bug doesn't come back
- Is skeptical of AI-generated fixes ("how do I know it's actually fixed?")
## Why TDD for Bug Fixes
```
Without TDD: With TDD:
Bug reported Bug reported
→ AI generates fix → Write failing test (RED)
→ Deploy → AI generates fix (GREEN)
→ Hope it works → Test passes — confirmed fixed
→ Bug returns later → Test prevents regression forever
```
## Process
### Phase 1: Understand the Bug
Gather information:
1. **What's the expected behavior?**
2. **What's the actual behavior?**
3. **Steps to reproduce?**
4. **Which code is involved?**
```
Grep: "[relevant keyword]" to find the source
Read: the suspected file(s)
```
Identify:
- [ ] The function/method where the bug lives
- [ ] The input that triggers the bug
- [ ] The incorrect output/behavior
- [ ] The correct expected output/behavior
### Phase 2: RED — Write the Failing Test
Write a test that **fails because of the bug**. This proves the bug exists.
#### Template: Logic Bug
```swift
import Testing
@testable import YourApp
@Suite("Bug Fix: [Brief description]")
struct BugFix_DescriptionTests {
@Test("should [expected behavior] — was [actual behavior]")
func reproduceBug() {
// Arrange — set up the conditions that trigger the bug
let calculator = PriceCalculator()
// Act — perform the operation that's broken
let result = calculator.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 50)
// Assert — what it SHOULD return (this will FAIL now)
#expect(result == 50.0) // Currently returns 0.5 (bug: divides by 100 twice)
}
}
```
#### Template: Async Bug
```swift
@Test("should return cached items when network fails — was crashing")
func reproduceBug() async throws {
let mockNetwork = MockNetworkClient(shouldFail: true)
let mockCache = MockCache(items: [.sample])
let service = DataService(network: mockNetwork, cache: mockCache)
// This should return cached data, but currently crashes
let items = try await service.fetchItems()
#expect(items.count == 1)
}
```
#### Template: State Bug
```swift
@Test("should update count after deletion — was showing stale count")
func reproduceBug() {
let manager = ItemManager()
manager.addItem(Item(title: "Test"))
manager.deleteItem(at: 0)
#expect(manager.count == 0) // Currently still returns 1
#expect(manager.items.isEmpty) // Currently still contains item
}
```
#### Template: Edge Case Bug
```swift
@Test("should handle empty input — was crashing with index out of range")
func reproduceBug() {
let parser = CSVParser()
// This crashes with empty string
let result = parser.parse("")
#expect(result.rows.isEmpty)
#expect(result.columns.isEmpty)
}
```
#### Template: UI State Bug
```swift
@Test("should show error state when API fails — was showing infinite spinner")
func reproduceBug() async {
let failingAPI = MockAPI(shouldFail: true)
let viewModel = ListViewModel(api: failingAPI)
await viewModel.loadData()
#expect(viewModel.state == .error) // Currently stuck on .loading
#expect(viewModel.isLoading == false)
}
```
**Run the test — it MUST fail.** If it passes, you haven't reproduced the bug.
```bash
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp \
-only-testing "YourAppTests/BugFix_DescriptionTests"
```
### Phase 3: GREEN — Fix the Bug
Now fix the code to make the test pass. The fix should be **minimal** — only change what's needed.
#### Fix Guidelines
- **Minimal, targeted fix** — change only what's needed; don't refactor or fix unrelated issues (file those separately)
- **AI should target the specific test** — give Claude the failing test as context
```
Prompt to Claude: "Here's a failing test that reproduces a bug.
Fix the source code to make this test pass without breaking
any existing tests."
```
**Run the test — it MUST pass now.**
```bash
# Run the bug fix test
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp \
-only-testing "YourAppTests/BugFix_DescriptionTests"
# Run ALL tests to check for regressions
xcodebuild test -scheme YourApp
```
### Phase 4: REFACTOR (Optional)
If the fix introduced duplication or the code could be cleaner:
1. **Refactor only with all tests passing**
2. **Run tests after each change**
3. **Keep the bug fix test** — it's now a permanent regression test
### Phase 5: Verify Completeness
Checklist before marking the bug as fixed:
- [ ] Failing test written that reproduces the bug
- [ ] Fix implemented — test now passes
- [ ] All existing tests still pass (no regressions)
- [ ] Edge cases covered (empty, nil, boundary values)
- [ ] Test is clearly named and documents the bug
- [ ] Fix is minimal — no unrelated changes
## Multiple Related Bugs
If a bug has multiple symptoms, write multiple tests:
```swift
@Suite("Bug Fix: Discount calculation errors")
struct BugFix_DiscountCalculationTests {
@Test("50% discount on $100 should be $50")
func fiftyPercentDiscount() {
let calc = PriceCalculator()
#expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 100, percent: 50) == 50.0)
}
@Test("discount on $0 should return $0")
func zeroPrice() {
let calc = PriceCalculator()
#expect(calc.applyDiscount(price: 0, percent: 50) == 0.0)
}
}
```
## Output Format
```markdown
## Bug Fix: [Description]
### Bug Summary
- **Expected**: [What should happen]
- **Actual**: [What was happening]
- **Root cause**: [Why it was broken]
### Test (RED)
```swift
// Failing test that reproduces the bug
```
### Fix (GREEN)
**File**: `path/to/file.swift:XX`
```swift
// Before (buggy)
// After (fixed)
```
### Verification
- [x] Bug test fails before fix
- [x] Bug test passes after fix
- [x] All existing tests still pass
- [x] Edge cases covered: [list]
### Regression Prevention
Test added: `Tests/BugFixes/BugFix_DescriptionTests.swift`
This test will catch any future regression of this bug.
```
## Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Problem | Solution |
|---------|---------|----------|
| Test passes before fix | You didn't reproduce the bug | Make assertions more specific |
| Fix breaks other tests | Fix was too broad | Revert and use smaller, targeted change |
| Test is too specific | Brittle, breaks on unrelated changes | Test behavior, not implementation details |
| Skipping the red step | No proof the test catches the bug | Always verify test fails first |
## References
- `testing/tdd-feature/` — for new features (not bug fixes)
- `testing/characterization-test-generator/` — for capturing existing behavior first
- `generators/test-generator/` — for general test generation
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!