Use when the user wants a milestone of Execution-block-stamped GitHub issues implemented via a multi-agent dynamic workflow: "create the workflow for v0", "run v0 continuously", "/milestone-workflow v0". Builds tracks, gets the run plan approved, runs the milestone-pipeline workflow to LGTM PRs, merges them in-session, and releases when every issue merges. Stage 7 of the new-app-pipeline.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Milestone Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/richkuo-milestone-workflow)
---
name: milestone-workflow
description: >-
Use when the user wants a milestone of Execution-block-stamped GitHub issues implemented via a multi-agent dynamic workflow: "create the workflow for v0", "run v0 continuously", "/milestone-workflow v0". Builds tracks, gets the run plan approved, runs the milestone-pipeline workflow to LGTM PRs, merges them in-session, and releases when every issue merges. Stage 7 of the new-app-pipeline.
---
# milestone-workflow
No subagent holds merge authority: at each LGTM the run pauses as `awaiting_merge`; the session merges (step 5) and resumes with the merge in `args.merged`. Read-only table: `milestoneplan`.
## Steps
### 1. Build the dependency tracks
Follow `run-plan.md` (Dependency tracks): build, resume, and skip buckets; cross-bucket edges; `**Depends on:**` (hard) and `**Runs after:**` (ordering-only) edges, inferred ones labeled; rejecting missing references, self-references, and cycles; out-of-milestone references. Tracks are `{ issues, after, runsAfter }`; `after` and `runsAfter` hold 0-based track indices.
### 2. Present the run plan; approval is mandatory
Show the target branch (repo default, or the user's `targetBranch`, which also means no release), numbered tracks with titles (1-based display number beside each 0-based index), hard `after` edges separate from `runsAfter` edges, inferred edges, each issue's model/effort/fableplan (plan effort: stamped, else high) naming the harness on every Codex or Cursor CLI build or Codex CLI validate (`cli-dispatch` under an Opus 5.5 driver, never a substituted Claude run), the readiness boundary, and merge order. **Do not invoke the Workflow tool until the user approves**; approval is the multi-agent opt-in, and step 2 is never skipped.
State the GitHub writes: issue-body corrections, plan comments, PRs, review comments, and, with merging on, squash-merges at LGTM plus green CI, branch deletion, issue closure, a docs-sync PR and its merge, a version-bump PR and its merge, and a release. Approval authorizes them; `merge: false` keeps merging manual.
Add a **Run size** line: baseline `1 prep + per issue (1 validate + (fableplan ? 1 plan : 0) + 1 implement + (subagent review ? 1 reviewer : 0))`, ceiling `baseline + 3 × issues`. Compare both with the session's Dynamic workflow size guideline (else Claude Code's default of more than 25 scheduled agents), name the source, and recommend a split when either crosses it or projected tokens exceed 1.5 million (review-loop agents excluded). With a token target, an issue starting with under `budgetFloor` tokens (default 80k) left returns `budget_deferred`. **External CLI spend is outside every number above**: each pass and retry of a Codex or Cursor CLI build or Codex CLI validate bills that CLI's account; say so on any plan with a CLI stamp.
### 3. Preflight the repo
Follow `run-plan.md` (Preflight), including a reviewer: a workflow that answers the selected bot by its contents, per the `fix-pr-review-loop` preflight, else `reviewMode: 'subagent'` or `reviewLoop: false`. An issue with no Execution block stops the run; send it through `execution-plan-review`.
### 4. Run
Invoke `{name: 'milestone-pipeline', args: {tracks: [...], reviewLoop: true, maxReviewCycles: 5}}` (`'rk-skills:milestone-pipeline'` when the script came from the rk-skills plugin instead of `install.sh` or `npx rk-skills`). Options: `budgetFloor`; `reviewMode` (`'github'` default, `'subagent'`); `reviewBot` (`'claude'` default; `'codex'` only when the user names Codex, never inferred from a `codex.yml`); `merge` (default `reviewLoop`; rejected with `reviewLoop: false`); `merged` (step 5 records, empty at first); `release` (default `merge`, or `false` with `targetBranch`; rejected without merge); `targetBranch` (every PR's base and worktree start, passed to `validate-issue` and `work-on-issue`; returned as `target_branch`).
On return, comment the runId and script path on the milestone's first issue (footer: `Created with LLM: <current model> | high | Harness: milestone-workflow`). That comment, the issues with their Execution blocks, and the open PRs are the run's only state.
The script owns the phases. Outcomes relied on: `INVALID` issues skip; a higher validator score raises each build line below the new band default, keeps every stamp at or above it (Fable 5.1 builds and CLI harnesses keep model and effort), and yields a `rescore` record; a head whose newest test result fails without proof the failures also occur on the base, or with no test result, returns `tests_failed`; review loops reach LGTM before any successor starts (subagent mode: a `pr-review` reviewer agent and a `fix-pr-review` fixer; `fix-pr-review-loop` owns the step-down ladder); a validated `args.merged` record counts as merged, and a PR at LGTM without one returns `awaiting_merge` (successors `merge_pending` or `dependency_blocked`), ending the run for step 5; `release.deferred: true` returns only when every issue merged; failed, blocked, `tests_failed`, or unmerged hard predecessors block descendants; a dependency integration conflict stops before product changes and names the conflicting heads.
### 5. Merge-resume loop, monitor, close out
On each `awaiting_merge`, merge that PR in-session, then resume. Merge one PR at a time, finishing sub-steps 1 to 6 before the next, so each remaining PR is recomputed on the new base. A PR merges on the `fix-pr-review-loop` stop rule (`docs/contract-inventory.md`, review-cycle stop row): the standing verdict at the verified head is `LGTM` with no `### Needs Fixing` or `### Requires Human Review` section, and it lists no findings or the review count is above the cap of 5. Review count: github mode, `review_count` from the PR's round history (`skills/fix-pr-review/rereview-routing.md`); subagent mode, the run record's `review.reviews_run`, as the round history never counts in-session subagent reviews. `lgtm_with_nonblocking` arrives on review `maxReviewCycles + 1` in both modes, so it qualifies only when that count is above 5, as always at the default `maxReviewCycles: 5`. Any LGTM listing items at a count of 5 or less, `lgtm_with_nonblocking` from a lower `maxReviewCycles` included, is never merge-eligible; it returns to `fix-pr-review-loop`, whose step 1 rebuilds `review_count` from the PR history.
1. `gh pr view <num> --json state,headRefName,headRefOid,mergeStateStatus`: OPEN, and `headRefOid` equals the reviewed SHA the run returned; a different head returns to the review loop. After an in-session `fix-pr-review-loop` from this step, the reviewed SHA becomes the head the newest qualifying LGTM covers, proved by the sub-step 4 recency gate; re-enter here with it.
2. CI gate: `gh pr checks <num> --watch`; any failed check blocks. With no checks, pass only when the run record reports, for the verified head, `tests_passed` true or failures proven to occur on the base too (`tests_failures_preexisting` true); else run the repo test suite on the verified head in a worktree, and a failure blocks. `baseRefName` must equal the target branch. Behind the base: `gh pr update-branch <num>` only when it merges cleanly, re-capture the head, repeat the CI gate. On conflicts (`mergeStateStatus` `DIRTY`, or a failed update), resolve in-session: check out the PR branch in a worktree, merge the base, keep both sides' intent, run the repo tests and stop on any failure, push, record the conflicted file list, re-capture the head, and repeat the CI gate on it.
3. Fix `<verified-sha>`. Subagent mode: the reviewed SHA, or the re-captured head after a clean update once the decision below keeps the LGTM. Github mode: the reviewed SHA only; a changed head returns to the review loop for a fresh LGTM, except the conflict case below. **Merge re-review decision**: apply `fix-pr-review` step 7's merge re-review rule, its owner, with no test of your own. It covers conflict resolutions this session pushed (both modes) and a clean update (subagent mode), when those base merges are the only commits after the reviewed SHA. Judge the complete diff from the reviewed SHA to the head, all automatically merged base changes and hand-resolved files included. Prose only: the standing LGTM holds and `<verified-sha>` becomes the new head. A behavior change, or any doubt: github mode posts `@claude sonnet review` (`@codex luna review` with `reviewBot: 'codex'`), subagent mode runs one subagent `pr-review` cycle, and either needs a fresh bare LGTM on the new head. Record the decision and reason in the progress relay.
4. **Github mode LGTM recency gate**, run last and again after every CI wait or branch update: re-fetch the live head and comment history; find the newest one-line `@<bot> [model] review [effort]` trigger and the newest `github-actions[bot]` output linking `/actions/runs/<run-id>`. That run must be `completed` with `success`, and the output later than the trigger with exactly one standalone `LGTM` line (the verdict-line check; listed non-blocking items pass only under the merge criterion above). A newer trigger or no matching output blocks; never fall back to an older LGTM. Never compare the run's `head_sha` to the PR head (an `issue_comment` run reports the default branch); require the output's `created_at` later than the head became visible: the earliest check-suite `created_at` on `<verified-sha>`, else its committer date. One exemption: when sub-step 3 decided the conflict-case diff from `<reviewed-sha>` to `<verified-sha>` is prose only, visibility time is the reviewed SHA's, so the standing LGTM passes on `<verified-sha>`. Any other commit after the LGTM, author pushes included, blocks. Run sub-step 5 immediately after.
5. `gh pr merge <num> --squash --delete-branch --match-head-commit <verified-sha>`, never unpinned. If GitHub rejects the head, restart from sub-step 1; never retry with a fresh SHA.
6. Confirm the issue closed (`gh issue view <n> --json state`; close it if needed) and capture the merge SHA (`gh pr view <num> --json mergeCommit`).
7. Resume with the same `scriptPath` and `resumeFromRunId`, passing the **complete original `args`** (`tracks` is required) with `args.merged` extended by `{issue, pr, merge_sha, issue_state}` for every merge so far. The run rejects an unknown or repeated issue or PR, or a PR it did not open (`merge_record_mismatch`, blocking that issue's descendants), and lists unused records in `unmatched_merged_records`. Repeat until no `awaiting_merge` remains; on empty or odd results read the run's `journal.jsonl` and resume instead of restarting.
Close out: on `release.deferred: true`, run `sync-docs-release` in-session and report the tag and URL, unless `target_branch` differs from the repo default branch (`create-release` cuts only from the default); then the release stays manual until the target merges into the default. Issues that never reached `merged`: merge stragglers in-session and resume, or run `sync-docs-release` yourself. Branch protection blocking squash merges means `merge: false` with successors stacking on unmerged heads; an Actions outage means `reviewMode: 'subagent'` on the next invocation.
Relay progress. On completion, report issue, PR, review and merge status, agent flags, and the release outcome. For every `rescore` record: load `github-issue-format`, restamp the `[C..]` title and the Execution block's build model, effort, and fableplan to the record's `rerouted` values (what the run used; footer verb `Updated`), and say what changed. The restamp never lowers a line: a stamped model, effort, Fable 5.1 build, CLI harness, or `fableplan first: Yes` at or above the band default stays as written, per `validate-issue/issue-editing.md`. With merging off, recommend a merge order with every hard prerequisite first.