Claude Skills by richkuo

Use when the user wants an app idea turned into a Product Requirements Document (PRD) committed to a repo — "create a PRD", "/app-prd", "turn this idea into a PRD", or a raw idea dump ending with "save it to this repo". Produces a complete, section-numbered PRD.md landed via worktree + PR, bootstrapping an empty repo if needed. Stage 1 of the new-app-pipeline.

Required dispatch procedure for running a build or fix pass on an external coding CLI — the Codex CLI (`codex exec`) or the Cursor CLI (`agent -p`) — when an issue's Execution block stamps that harness as the Build model. Preflight, the two shims, the prompt-as-data rule, the background-and-poll rule, result parsing, the substitution check, attribution, and the failure table. Load BEFORE dispatching any Codex CLI or Cursor CLI build.

Use when the user asks to "create a release", "cut a release", "tag a version", "publish release notes", or ship a new versioned GitHub release for the current repo.

Use when the user wants to review or revise the ordering/model/effort/fableplan/plan-effort assignments on a milestone's GitHub issues — "review the execution plan", "/execution-plan-review", "show me the model assignments", or piecemeal revisions like "11 should be medium" or "plan 17 at xhigh". Renders the assignment table from the issues' Execution blocks, validates revisions, and writes them back. Stage 5 of the new-app-pipeline.

Use when the user wants a task executed by the current session model with a persistent Fable 5.1 advisor overseeing it. A read-only Fable 5.1 subagent writes the plan and answers checkpoint consults; a separate fresh Fable 5.1 reviewer issues a binding pre-commit verdict. Accepts a GitHub issue or a prose task. Trigger on "/fable-advisor", "fable-advisor <task or issue>", or "execute this with a fable advisor".

Required dispatch procedure for running a subagent on Fable 5.1: positive harness detection, the Claude Code CLI shim for other harnesses, the fallback ladder, the result-parsing contract, the attribution rule, and the caller dispatch-hygiene rules (read-only prompt, snapshot/diff, retry). Load BEFORE dispatching any `model: fable` subagent.

Use when the user asks to have a Fable 5.1 subagent draft and file a GitHub issue, then autonomously drive it all the way to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-new-issue-loop", "fable create the issue and run it to completion". Runs fable-new-issue to create a fully-specified issue (drafted by a Fable 5.1 subagent), then hands the new issue number to validate-issue-loop (validate → update → work-on-issue-loop) — stopping instead when a duplicate is found or the discussion hasn't converged on ...

Use when the user wants a GitHub issue created by a Fable 5.1 subagent. Spins up a read-only subagent running on Fable 5.1 that executes the new-issue procedure (duplicate check, code grounding, approach design, complexity score) and returns a fully-composed issue draft, which the main agent spot-checks and files. Trigger on "/fable-new-issue", "fable new issue <description>", or "create this issue with fable".

Use when the user wants a task decomposed and driven by a Fable 5.1 orchestrator delegating implementation to Sonnet 5 workers. Fable decomposes into self-contained specs, dispatches Sonnet workers (Agents for 1–2 pieces, a Workflow for fan-out), reviews each result, merges into one branch, and takes a binding verdict from a fresh Fable reviewer. Trigger on "/fable-orchestrate", "fable-orchestrate <task>", or "orchestrate this with fable".

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1, always plan it with Fable 5.1, and autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-fableplan-loop", "fable validate, fable plan, and work on #N", "fully automate #N with fable validation and an unconditional fable plan". Runs fable-validate, auto-applies its update-issue edits when the verdict calls for it, has fableplan produce and post a Fable 5.1 implementation plan for EVERY issue (no score gate — unlik...

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1 and always plan it with Fable 5.1, stopping once the plan is posted — "fable-validate-fableplan", "fable validate and fable plan #N", "validate and plan #N with fable, don't build it". Runs fable-validate, auto-applies its update-issue edits when the verdict calls for it, then has fableplan produce and post a Fable 5.1 implementation plan for EVERY issue (no score gate), and stops at the posted plan — no worktree, no build, no P...

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1 and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-loop", "fable validate and work on #N", "fully automate issue #N with fable". Runs fable-validate, auto-applies its update-issue edits when the verdict calls for it, has fableplan produce and post a Fable 5.1 implementation plan (skipped when the validated score is below 71 with no safety flags), then hands off to work-on-issue-loop — stopping instead ...

Use when the user wants a GitHub issue validated by a Fable 5.1 subagent. Spins up a read-only subagent running on Fable 5.1 that executes the validate-issue procedure (claim tracing, architecture/consistency checks, complexity score), then relays the verdict back to the main agent, which presents it and takes any follow-on action (update issue, work on issue). Trigger on "/fable-validate", "fable validate <issue>", or "validate this with fable".

Use when the user wants a GitHub issue planned by Fable 5.1 and then autonomously driven to a reviewed PR in one shot, without validation — "fableplan-loop", "fableplan #N and loop until approved", "plan #N with fable then drive it to a reviewed PR". Runs the fableplan planning phase (Fable 5.1 produces and posts an implementation plan to the issue), then hands off to work-on-issue-loop, which implements the plan in an isolated worktree, opens a PR, triggers @claude review, and fix-pr-review ...

Use when the user wants a GitHub issue planned by Fable 5.1 and then implemented in one shot, without validation or a review loop — "fableplan-work-on-issue", "fableplan and work on #N", "plan #N with fable then implement it". Runs the fableplan planning phase (Fable 5.1 produces and posts an implementation plan to the issue), then hands off to work-on-issue, which implements the plan in an isolated worktree and opens a PR that closes the issue. Stops at the open PR — it does not request revi...

Use when the user wants a task planned by a Fable 5.1 planning subagent before building it. Spins up a Plan subagent running on Fable 5.1 to produce an implementation plan, relays the plan back to the main agent, and — if a GitHub issue is referenced — posts the plan as a comment on that issue and asks the user whether to continue building now before proceeding. Trigger on "/fableplan", "fableplan this", or "plan this with fable".

Use when the user asks to fix a PR review and drive it to approval autonomously — "fix the PR review and loop until approved", "fix-pr-review-loop", "keep addressing review comments until this PR is approved". Takes an optional PR number/URL (defaults to the current branch's PR). Repeatedly calls fix-pr-review, waits for the bot's re-review (@claude by default, @codex when selected), and repeats. Stops on a bare LGTM, on the first LGTM past 5 cycles, or to escalate when four or more cycles ke...

Use when the user asks to fix, address, or respond to a PR review — "fix the PR review", "/fix-pr-review". Optional PR number/URL (defaults to the current branch's PR); optional `codex` argument selects Codex.

Required format for creating or editing any GitHub issue — [C<score>] title convention, complexity rationale line, complete-body rule, mandatory Plain simple English section, attribution footer. Load BEFORE creating or editing a GitHub issue.

Use when the user wants the current large language model to plan and build a task in the same session without a subagent. When an issue is referenced, it posts the plan and asks whether to build. Without an issue, it builds and opens a pull request after presenting the plan. Trigger on "/issueplan", "issueplan this", or "plan this issue in this session".

Use when the user wants a milestone of Execution-block-stamped GitHub issues implemented via a multi-agent dynamic workflow — "create the workflow for v0", "run v0 continuously", "/milestone-workflow v0". Builds dependency tracks, presents the run plan for approval, then runs the milestone-pipeline workflow: per-issue model/effort from the Execution blocks, optional fableplan stage, PRs, optional review loops until LGTM — the repo's @claude Action by default, or in-session subagent reviewers ...

Use when the user wants a milestone's execution plan shown as a table — "milestoneplan v1", "/milestoneplan", "show the plan for v1". Read-only - reads every issue in the milestone and renders one table of issue number, description, complexity, dependencies, validate/build model and effort, fableplan, plan effort, and first-review trigger. Never edits an issue and never launches a run. Stage 6 of the new-app-pipeline.

Use when the user wants to take a new app from raw idea to running multi-agent implementation — "/new-app-pipeline", "let's build a new app", "run the app pipeline on this idea". Orchestrates the full sequence - idea → PRD → question refinement → GitHub issues with Execution blocks → execution-plan review → milestone pre-flight → milestone workflow — with a user checkpoint between every stage.

Use when the user asks to file a GitHub issue and then autonomously drive it all the way to a reviewed PR in one shot — "new-issue-loop", "create the issue and run it to completion", "file this and fully automate it". Runs new-issue to create a fully-specified issue, then hands the new issue number to validate-issue-loop (validate → update → work-on-issue-loop) — stopping instead when new-issue finds a duplicate or the discussion hasn't converged on one issue.

Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims against the code before filing and produces a complete, complexity-scored issue — never a stub.

Required format and rules for any pull request (PR) review comment — verdict line, finding sections, materiality filter, safety carve-out. Load BEFORE composing or posting a PR review.

Use when the user wants every open question in a PRD resolved interactively — "ask me all questions", "/prd-questions", "let's resolve the open questions". Sweeps the PRD for open questions and ambiguities, asks them in batched multiple-choice form with recommendations, folds every answer back into the owning spec section, and empties the Open Questions section. Stage 2 of the new-app-pipeline.

Use when the user wants a finished PRD broken into GitHub milestones and issues — "file the issues from the PRD", "/prd-to-issues", "break this into GitHub issues". Derives dependency-ordered milestones, files complete complexity-scored issues (github-issue-format), and stamps each with an Execution block (typed predecessors, build model, effort, fableplan, review trigger). Stage 4 of the new-app-pipeline.

Use when the user wants to sync docs and then cut a release in one shot. Combines sync-docs → land the doc changes (branch + PR, or a direct commit when the repo allows it) → create-release in sequence. Triggers on phrases like "sync docs and release", "sync and cut a release", "update docs and publish a release".

Use when the user asks to sync, update, or refresh CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, and README.md to reflect recent commits or PRs. Triggers on phrases like "sync docs", "update CLAUDE.md", "update AGENTS.md", "update SKILL.md", "update README", "reflect recent changes", or "document the recent PRs".

Use when the user types /tldr to get a plain-simple-English summary, written in ASD-STE100, of the most recent response in under 55 words.

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue (without Fable), conditionally plan it with fableplan, then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "validate-fableplan-loop", "validate, plan, and work on #N", "validate and fableplan and fully automate #N". Runs validate-issue on your session model (not a Fable subagent), auto-applies its update-issue edits when the verdict calls for it, has fableplan produce and post a Fable 5.1 implementation plan (skipped when the validated s...

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "validate and work on this issue", "validate-issue-loop", "fully automate issue #N". Runs validate-issue, auto-applies its update-issue edits when the verdict calls for it, then hands off to work-on-issue-loop — stopping instead when validation flags the issue as too large, architecturally infeasible, or already addressed by an existing PR.

Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check a GitHub issue against the code. Returns a cited update decision with a complexity score.

Use when the user types /wans to get the next steps for the current work, written in ASD-STE100, as a short numbered list.

Use when the user asks to implement a GitHub issue and drive it through review to completion autonomously — "work on issue and loop until approved", "work-on-issue-loop", or as the automatic follow-on from validate-issue-loop. Runs work-on-issue to implement and open the PR, triggers the first review from the selected review bot itself (@claude by default, @codex when selected), then waits for each review to land and calls fix-pr-review to resolve it. Stops on a bare LGTM with nothing left to...

Use when the user says "work on issue", "implement issue", "/work-on-issue", or asks to implement a GitHub issue end-to-end (not merely validate it). Takes an issue URL or number (defaults to the just-validated issue). Implements the fix in an isolated worktree, verifies it, commits and pushes, and opens a PR that closes the issue. Default follow-on when validate-issue offers "work on issue".