Use ownership and borrowing instead of reaching for clone, Rc, RefCell, or Arc<Mutex<_>> to silence the borrow checker. Every clone must be explainable. Use when code clones to make an error go away, when a borrow-checker fight is being resolved by copying data, when reviewing Rust dense with .clone() or Rc<RefCell<_>>, or when the user asks whether a clone is necessary.
Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding
Scanned 9/19/2026
npx -y skills add rewrite-rs/skills --skill ownership-not-clone --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ownership Not Clone?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rewrite-rs-ownership-not-clone)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: ownership-not-clone
description: Use ownership and borrowing instead of reaching for clone, Rc, RefCell, or Arc<Mutex<_>> to silence the borrow checker. Every clone must be explainable. Use when code clones to make an error go away, when a borrow-checker fight is being resolved by copying data, when reviewing Rust dense with .clone() or Rc<RefCell<_>>, or when the user asks whether a clone is necessary.
---
# Ownership, Not Clone
The borrow checker is a map of where ownership is being fudged, not an obstacle to
route around. This skill decides who holds a value and for how long.
## The rule
Every `clone` must be explainable in one sentence that is not "the borrow checker
complained." A clone that buys a real thing — a value that must outlive the borrow
— is fine; one that only silences an error is a deferred design decision.
## Read the error, not the workaround
`E0502` (a mutable borrow while an immutable one is still live) and `E0499` (two
mutable borrows of the same place) name a lifetime conflict; the fix is in the
structure the error describes, not in the `clone` that silences it:
```rust,ignore
// No clone: `first` is Copy, so the borrow ends at the let.
let first = items[0];
for _ in 0..n {
items.push(first);
}
```
## Borrow splitting
The borrow checker tracks a whole value through method calls, but fields
individually through direct field access. A `&mut self` method that also needs
`self.other_field` is the classic false conflict — destructure once:
```rust,ignore
// The two fields are separate lets and borrow independently.
impl Server {
fn handle(&mut self) {
let Self { connections, log, .. } = self;
for conn in connections.iter_mut() {
log.record(conn.id());
}
}
}
```
`split_at_mut` hands back two disjoint `&mut` halves of one slice; when
destructuring is not enough, extract a free function that takes the two fields.
## Take the cheapest thing that works, in argument position
`&str` over `&String`, `&[T]` over `&Vec<T>`, `impl AsRef<Path>` over a `PathBuf`
for a path a function only reads. A signature that takes `String` when it only
reads forces every caller into a clone — the bug is in the signature.
```rust,ignore
// Forces a clone at every call site that holds a &str.
fn log_message(message: String) { ... }
// Reads only — callers pass a reference and copy nothing.
fn log_message(message: &str) { ... }
```
## `Cow` for genuine borrow-or-own
`Cow<'_, str>` earns its keep when the common path returns the input untouched
and the rare path allocates.
```rust
use std::borrow::Cow;
// The common path borrows; only input containing a bracket allocates.
fn sanitize(input: &str) -> Cow<'_, str> {
if input.contains(['<', '>']) {
Cow::Owned(input.replace('<', "<").replace('>', ">"))
} else {
Cow::Borrowed(input)
}
}
```
## When `Rc`/`Arc`/`RefCell`/`Mutex` express a real requirement
Shared ownership is justified when the *runtime* structure genuinely has multiple
owners with no single one outliving the rest, and not when a single owner is
merely inconvenient to name. Run the four-question test in `SHARED-STATE.md`
before adding a `RefCell`; the decision table is in `CLONE-DECISIONS.md`; the
handle clone that passes the one-sentence test is in `SHARED-STATE.md`.
## `mem::take` and `mem::replace`
`mem::take` and `mem::replace` move a value out of a `&mut` by leaving a default
in its place — the answer to "I need to own this but I only have a mutable borrow":
```rust,ignore
let old = mem::take(&mut self.buffer);
```
## Avoid statics
A `static` holding mutable or lazily-initialised state is a lifetime nobody wrote
down and an ownership story nobody can follow. Pass the value, or hold it in the
type that owns the work.
## Deferrals
Reshaping how correct code is expressed is `/idiomatic-rust`; modelling invariants
into types is `/type-driven-design`; error types are `/rust-errors`; shared state
across `.await` points is `/async-rust`.
## Verification
Keeping or removing a clone changes no behaviour, so the claim "this still works"
is settled by the suite, at the lint level the repo configures:
```bash
cargo clippy --all-targets # add -- -D warnings only if the repo has no lint config
cargo test
```
`clippy::redundant_clone` is `nursery` and off by default — run it one-off with
`cargo clippy -- -W clippy::redundant_clone` as a proposal generator, never write
it into the repo lint config; its findings are candidates, not edits.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!