Skip to content
Back to skills

Best Practices

ASecurity

Research current practices or compare approaches using primary evidence and the user's constraints.

  • 12 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
developmentgoapidocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 22, 2026

npx -y skills add reidemeister94/development-skills --skill best-practices --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Best Practices?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Best Practices
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/reidemeister94-best-practices/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/reidemeister94-best-practices)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: best-practices
description: "Research current practices or compare approaches using primary evidence and the user's constraints."
argument-hint: "<topic>"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: WebSearch, WebFetch, Read, Glob, Grep, Skill
---

# Best practices

Research the requested topic with current, high-quality evidence and first-principles reasoning.
Keep research artifacts outside the repository unless the result remains useful after the task.
If a subagent performs the research, give the main agent the artifact paths.

For technical topics, prefer primary and authoritative sources:

- official documentation and specifications;
- maintainer posts, authoritative engineering blogs, and peer-reviewed papers;
- widely adopted open-source projects that are actively maintained.

Age each claim against its own horizon.
Versions, APIs, pricing, limits, and advisories can change within weeks.
Tool choices can change within months. Architecture and patterns can remain valid for years.
Explain why an older source still applies and check whether a newer source replaced it.
Mark facts that you cannot confirm as unverified.

Cite material claims inline and separate evidence from inference.
Explain consensus, disagreement, uncertainty, and where each recommendation applies.
State what evidence would overturn the recommendation.
Recommend for the user's goals and constraints, not for an imaginary average user.

If missing context changes the answer, ask for it or give clearly conditional recommendations.
Do not pad the report with source quotas, evidence labels, or weak secondary sources.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md17.9 KB
  • references/research-strategy.md13.4 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.