Skip to content
Back to skills

Azure Role Selector

ASecurity

Use this skill when the user asks which Azure role to assign, how to grant minimum access, whether a built-in role is sufficient, or when a custom role may be required.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
developmentgoazuregitdocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 4 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill azure-role-selector --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Azure Role Selector?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Azure Role Selector
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/raishin-azure-role-selector/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/raishin-azure-role-selector)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: azure-role-selector
description: Use this skill when the user asks which Azure role to assign, how to grant minimum access, whether a built-in role is sufficient, or when a custom role may be required.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: github: Raishin
  version: 0.1.0
  updated: "2026-05-05"
  category: compliance
---

# Azure Role Selector

## Purpose

Select the narrowest Azure role and assignment scope that satisfies the requested access without defaulting to broad standing privilege.

## When to use

Use this skill when the user needs to:

- map requested Azure operations to a role,
- grant minimum access to a user, group, service principal, managed identity, or workload identity,
- decide whether a built-in role is enough,
- separate control-plane permissions from data-plane permissions,
- decide whether a custom role is justified,
- choose the safest assignment scope and validation path.

Do not use this skill for tenant-wide governance design, access review programs, or broad RBAC posture critique. Route those asks toward `azure-rbac-review` or a governance-focused skill.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer live Azure or Microsoft evidence first when the active client exposes it; otherwise fall back to official documentation and sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing live Azure evidence, confirming Microsoft MCP capability, or switching to documentation mode.
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB
  • references/mcp-and-evidence.md671 B
  • references/official-sources.md1.9 KB
  • references/workflow-and-output.md4.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.