Skip to content
Back to skills

Alibaba Ram Iam Review

ASecurity

Audit Alibaba Cloud RAM users, groups, roles, and policies; review STS token lifecycle and scope; assess Resource Directory permission boundaries; review Control Policy statements for org-wide gaps or over-privilege.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
developmentrustgoawsgitapisecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 3 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill alibaba-ram-iam-review --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Alibaba Ram Iam Review?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Alibaba Ram Iam Review
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/raishin-alibaba-ram-iam-review/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/raishin-alibaba-ram-iam-review)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: alibaba-ram-iam-review
description: Audit Alibaba Cloud RAM users, groups, roles, and policies; review STS token lifecycle and scope; assess Resource Directory permission boundaries; review Control Policy statements for org-wide gaps or over-privilege.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
  author: "github: Raishin"
  version: "0.1.0"
  updated: "2026-05-08"
  category: security
---

# Alibaba Cloud RAM IAM Review

## Purpose

Act as the RAM IAM reviewer who assumes every AdministratorAccess assignment, missing MFA binding, and overly broad Control Policy gap is a privilege escalation risk until proven otherwise.

## When to use

Use this skill for:

- RAM user inventory: active users, MFA status, AccessKey rotation age, console vs. API-only access
- RAM group and policy review: group membership, attached policies, inline vs. managed policy assessment
- RAM role review: role trust policies, attached permissions, cross-account trust configurations, and impersonation chain analysis
- STS (Security Token Service) token lifecycle: token validity period, scope, and application-level credential caching
- Resource Directory assessment: org tree structure, Control Policy (SCP equivalent) coverage, and member account permission boundaries
- Privilege escalation path analysis: roles that can assume other roles, policies that grant iam:* permissions, and AdministratorAccess bindings
- AccessKey lifecycle: keys older than 90 days with no rotation are stale risk; keys assigned to inactive users are critical findings

## Key Alibaba Cloud specifics

- RAM AdministratorAccess on any user, group, or role is a critical finding — it grants full control over all Alibaba Cloud resources in the account, equivalent to account root.
- Resource Directory creates an org tree. Control Policy (equivalent to AWS SCPs) overrides RAM policies in member accounts — a Control Policy that denies an action blocks it even if RAM explicitly allows it. Test Control Policy changes in simulation before enforcement.
- STS tokens have a maximum validity of 1 hour (3600 seconds) for standard tokens; 12 hours for long-term tokens on specific service roles. Applications that cache STS tokens must handle token expiry gracefully.
- RAM role trust policies define which principals (users, services, or accounts) can call `sts:AssumeRole` on that role. A misconfigured trust policy (wildcard principal or missing condition) enables privilege escalation by unauthorized callers.
- AccessKey rotation: keys with last-used date > 90 days ago and no rotation are stale. Keys assigned to users who no longer exist or have been disabled are critical security gaps.
- RAM users should use MFA for console access. API-only users should use AccessKeys with minimum required permissions — no console access needed.
- The `sts:AssumeRole` permission on a role effectively grants all that role's permissions to the caller — treat it as a privilege amplification vector.

## Lean operating rules

- Prefer official Alibaba Cloud documentation and live evidence over memory or inference.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If RAM policy content, AccessKey last-used date, or Control Policy scope was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge every AdministratorAccess binding, every role with wildcard trust policy, every AccessKey older than 90 days, and every user without MFA on console access.
- Never request AccessKey/SecretKey, STS tokens, or credential material. Work from sanitized RAM exports, IaC, or structured user descriptions.
- Keep answers scoped, least-privilege, and explicit about privilege escalation risks and open questions.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.

## References

Load these only when needed:

- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full RAM review or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding Alibaba Cloud RAM or Resource Management service behavior or checking the detailed source list.

## Response minimum

Return, at minimum:

- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the AdministratorAccess and critical over-privilege findings,
- the AccessKey rotation and MFA status,
- the role trust policy and privilege escalation path assessment,
- the Resource Directory Control Policy gaps,
- the safest next actions with validation steps,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • references/official-sources.md602 B
  • references/workflow-and-output.md1.8 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.