Evaluates the ability of LLM-based agents to autonomously resolve software engineering issues by modifying code in real-world repositories. It probes environment setup, code generation, and test execution capabilities across multiple programming languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SWE-rebench V2, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports pass@1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill swe-rebench-v2-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Swe Rebench V2 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-swe-rebench-v2-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: swe-rebench-v2-eval
description: Evaluates the ability of LLM-based agents to autonomously resolve software engineering issues by modifying code in real-world repositories. It probes environment setup, code generation, and test execution capabilities across multiple programming languages. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SWE-rebench V2, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports pass@1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2602.23866
bibtex_key: badertdinov2026swe_rebench_v2
confidence: high
---
# swe-rebench-v2-eval
> SWE-rebench V2: Language-Agnostic SWE Task Collection at Scale — Badertdinov et al. (2026) (arXiv:2602.23866, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the ability of LLM-based agents to autonomously resolve software engineering issues by modifying code in real-world repositories. It probes environment setup, code generation, and test execution capabilities across multiple programming languages.
## Datasets
- **SWE-rebench V2** — total 32000; splits: test (300)
## Metrics
- `pass@1` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Fraction of tasks where at least one out of k attempts successfully passes the test suite.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Repository codebase, issue description, and test suite provided in an interactive shell environment with base dependencies installed.
**Output**: Modified source code files and/or shell commands to resolve the issue. Success is determined by running the provided test suite.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_pass_at_k(successes_per_task, k):
# successes_per_task: list of lists of booleans (k attempts per task)
passed = [any(attempts) for attempts in successes_per_task]
return sum(passed) / len(passed)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Test suite coupling: models may correctly fix the target issue but fail due to regressions in unrelated code paths caught by the test suite.
- Implicit naming requirements: tests often expect specific implementation details not specified in the problem statement.
- External dependencies: problem statements may reference inaccessible URLs or auth-walled resources, causing agent failure.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 6: Pass rates (%) by model and programming language. | Model | Py | JS | Go | Rust | Scala | pass@1 | pass@3 |
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{badertdinov2026swe_rebench_v2,
title={SWE-rebench V2: Language-Agnostic SWE Task Collection at Scale},
author={Badertdinov et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2602.23866}
}
```
- arXiv: 2602.23866
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!